Something I *THINK* got from Priyankas thread

[RouletteGhost]

Whether or not this is something Priyanka was trying to get across I do not know

I do not speak for Pri

When last 2 dozens were different:

like shown below
12
23
13

bet them for the next 3 spins as there is likely to be a repeat within 4 spins

am i off base with this?

it will lose if:

we have dozen 1 then dozen 2, and then dozen 3 hits 3 times in a row

just thinking out loud

trying to make sense

[thelaw]

So to lose you would need :

1,2,3,3,3

or

2,3,1,1,1

or

3,2,1,1,1

......and what progression/stop/loss?

[RouletteGhost]

im puzzled

because i know it will lose

but i think this is one of the points.....being made?

i dont know

[thelaw]

You would need a pretty steep progression to get ahead.........why not just bet the first spin after different dozens show?

[RouletteGhost]

You would need a pretty steep progression to get ahead.........why not just bet the first spin after different dozens show?

definitely an option

doz 1 and doz 2 just came up

bet 1 and 2 once

if lose wait for 2 different to show again back to back

then bet those 2

would need 4 unique dozen sequences in a row to lose using a 4 step progression

as we know 4 unique dozen patterns in a row is rare rare rare

i think something good is cookin here

1
2
now bet 1 and 2
3   LOSE
1
now bet 3 and 1
1 WIN

[thelaw]

Quote from GLC :


"When I use a progression on a double dozen bet, I like to use the 1-2-4-8 leveller bet method.
For a less aggressive method I use a basic 2:1 labby.  Remember, when using a labby with this bet, when you lose, you have to write both bets on the end of your line to be recovered."

[RouletteGhost]

Here are some real spins, dozen decisions using above methodology, touched by the hand of monks

NB equals NO BET

2
1
2    W
3    L
1    L
1    W
2   NB
1   W
2   W
2   W
2   NB
2   NB
2   NB
2   NB
3   NB
1   L
3   W
1   W
3   W
1   W
3   W
2   L
3   W
1   L
1  W
1  NB
1   NB
1   NB
3   NB
1   W
2   L
2  W
3  NB
3   W
0   NB
3  NB
2   NB
3   W
2  W
2   W
3  NB

BOOM

wins flat, better with 1 3 9 of course

after 2 diff dozens bet only once, if lose only bet if last 2 were diff and bet those 2

[RouletteGhost]

What about a penthouse type progression......i'm sure GLC has one in one of his threads.

copied this from another thread......not from GLC :

Penthouse prog  111,222,333,444.... 
On L you move 1 step up, on W you move 2 steps down.

You can reset when in profit or play for your win goal.

this is good

[thelaw]

this is good

Just realized that this is for 1 dozen.....but I'm sure it can be modified.

[RouletteGhost]

IF 1 AND 2 JUST HIT, bet 1 and 2, if lose do not chase 1 and 2, stop, then bet the last 2 only if they are different

[thelaw]

IF 1 AND 2 JUST HIT, bet 1 and 2, if lose do not chase 1 and 2, stop, then bet the last 2 only if they are different

So to lose you would need :

1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3?

[RouletteGhost]

if 1 and 2 shows and we bet 1 and 2 for 3 spins with progression we will lose, because eventually 333 will follow

so STOP

and wait for another 2 different dozens to hit back to back then bet those....

it destroys zumma

[RouletteGhost]

So to lose you would need :

1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3?

123, 123, 123, 123

or

123, 321, 123, 213

from testing grassroots we know we wont have 4 uniques back to back! how rare!

[RouletteGhost]

just thinking out loud this may be stupid....who knows....

[thelaw]

123, 123, 123, 123

or

123, 321, 123, 213

from testing grassroots we know we wont have 4 uniques back to back! how rare!

....but wouldn't you bet the 2,3 after the first loss (3) loss and win with the next 3?