Is it not obvious

[tezza12]

I am not sure why I only thought of this now, after all I have been playing roulette for years and with mostly some small scale success, ive heard/tried almost every system going, even invented a few of my own, but the real way to win is obvious, is it not.

Have a team of at least 2 people, anything up to 6 will work, and all bet on different events, Especially on EC bets, if one is wrong, then the other will be right, if one is wrong 10 times on the bounce, the other will be right 10 times on the bounce, you will win more than you lose, or rather person 1 or 2 will win and the other will lose, just split the winnings as a team.

Or am I cuckoo here.

[RouletteGhost]

The bets will cancel eachother out

On a win parlay

Will need streaks to profit

[tezza12]

yes of course, but the streaks are almost risk free, 1 will always lose and 1 will always win its about minimizing the loses and riding the streaks, and trusting the other person/people

[RouletteGhost]

Vince armenti

Made a youtube vid about this

He was laughed off the boards

I did it once with my wife and won. Flat bet and on a win added a chip on a loss back to 1 and stay at 1 on losses. So one partner rode a winning streak with parlays

Varmenti

Watch if you wish

[tezza12]

why was he laughed off the boards for thinking of something that works, odd. did you only try it once, if so why, especially if you won, why not repeat.

[Mortagon]

Hi,

The last topic of F_LAT_INO: "TWO UNCLES CORRECTING EACH OTHER"
link:://:.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=10499.0


Peace in his soul and light in heavenly him way.

[The General]

Tezza12,

What would be kind of fun would be for you to pool your six players and have everyone play a reverse labby on their EC.  Most of the time nobody will win much, but every so often someone will have a quite an impressive win.  This kind of play can be quite a bit of fun on a Fri or Sat night when you're out for a good time with friends.   

"The Tezza12 Against The Bank".

Best of luck. 

The General.

[TurboGenius]

One person playing is doomed to the house edge.
Two people playing doubles everything - doom x 2
lol
Just kidding (but not really - if you test you'll see it doesn't work)

Kind of like some guy that cheats and rips you off and steals your money (casino) and now you
think it'll help to bring your friend with his wallet and somehow it won't happen to both of you.
The casino would love this idea !
The math doesn't change, regardless of how you team-up

[BellagioOwner]

ummm.. not sure how betting on both results of the same bet one winning and one losing can make somehowa profit but for sure you don't need 2 persons to check this out. I wouldn't bother testing it since i i can't see any point behind it BUT you can try it alone. with no friend, uncle, wife etc.
Just split your BR in half(or eeven more) and play both the sides as if there were 2 people (3,4,5,6 people). Half the BR should be losing , and the other half should be winning like in your 2 people situation. Kinda weird...

[Mortagon]

Mr oops' "reversed Labouchere SLH"
link:://:.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=2904.msg26450#msg26450

Thirteen against the Bank by Norman Leigh
link:://:.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=16978.msg155955#msg155955

[TurboGenius]

Just split your BR in half(or eeven more) and play both the sides as if there were 2 people (3,4,5,6 people). Half the BR should be losing , and the other half should be winning like in your 2 people situation. Kinda weird...

half should be losing and half should be winning ?
lol

Actually it's half will be losing and half will be losing - the casino is winning.
If you're not doing anything to change the math, you can have 30 people playing - then combine all results
and you'll see there's no difference. I covered this to great extent in another thread but no one was paying attention.

[BellagioOwner]

Actually it's half will be losing and half will be losing - the casino is winning.

yeap. i know and i agree with what you say. I was just referring for simplicity without any house edge zero pocket. i don't agree with such approach either, i was just stating that there is no need to bet on both sides of the same bet alone or with others or whatsoever

[Mortagon]

Quote from: Mortagon on Yesterday at 08:32:51 PM

    Actually it's half will be losing and half will be losing - the casino is winning.

This quote is not from me!

Actually it's half will be losing and half will be losing - the casino is winning.

[BellagioOwner]

yes. sorry. still i guess getting used to quoting in forums. I wanted anyway to comment the post not the person who posted it.
Have fun around