Randomer Thoughts

[falkor2k15]

I think Priyanka is genuine - just check out her maths skills with equations, etc. I get the impression that even Bayes, our resident PHD maths man, has been influenced by new ways of thinking from the first lady - she remains top of the leadership board despite Steve trying to conceal her edge in the lower rankings. Bayes also agrees with many things that Priyanka has stated. I think Priyanka is some kind of genius, but I guess her parents must have pushed her too hard as I can detect demons in her despite her exceptional abilities with logic and numbers. I admit I am inferior to Priyanka when it comes to Maths and Statistics, since my specialty lies with Exorcism - I do it better than the Church of Scientology - she can't match me there without a shadow of a doubt! So we are all intelligent in our own ways, innit?  So I'm trying my best not to be jealous.  Anyway, I was pondering this "creating dependencies" and wondering how we might take advantage of it? Priyanka is evidently trying very hard to transmit this knowledge to us - but I dunno about you guy but I am having great difficulty absorbing it and see the obvious? We know that past spins don't affect future spins due to them being independent, so if we discovered 2 dependent bet selections surrounding the quads and high/low ECs then might one virtual result be a trigger to bet the other selection due to peak? Or do we perhaps abandon both bet selections and choose a stitched amalgamated one via the numbers, streets or double streets?

[RouletteGhost]

I sincerely think its human nature to do what has been done. I.E. although he/she is doing best keep he/she off the top of the leaderboard. Leadership does this all the time. The government allows the FDA to surpress natural cures.

It would hurt the overall message of "you must increase your accuracy of predictions" to win.

Perhaps that is what is being done by said person using cycles. Increasing their accuracy by other means rather then the physical aspects.

The amount of spins thing is pure rubbish as long as you are consistent.

[RouletteGhost]

Luck and consistency do not fit together in this universe.

[RouletteGhost]

[TurboGenius]

Can you play like Priyanka on rouletteplayers.org to prove this?

No one can, that's the point. Get it ? 
lol

I'm really starting to think there's no hope 'here'.
I feel like someone in a church trying to tell people that the guy on the cross never existed, that it's a sham and they are being used - meanwhile everyone in the church could care less.
People like that truly get what they deserve. People want to put their faith and energy into nonsense and try to run off the people who honestly try to point them in the right direction.
It's absurd and a waste of time. Why bother, seriously.
This should have been handled properly from the start but it wasn't.

mumbo---heres the question . The way Priyanka plays has yielded a  positive 3.0  winrate on steves game after 2000 spins . Nothing against you but you feel you have a HG yet the winrate is not even in the positive on the game. And you can't see why people would be interested in exploring further?

I'm not reposting the video of the guy levitating in mid-air lol. Even I was amazed, until I figured out there was a crane doing it. I'm sure in 'this place' though, enough people will believe he REALLY did levitate and the crane was just there to make people think it was doing the work - Now lets ask the guy how he did it in 5 posts of 80 pages each instead of listening to someone who tells you it's the F*CKING crane.
"No........ Go away gravity believers !!!!! The crane is there as a conspiracy to make people think he can't really do it - but we all know he can because we are ignorant and have no problem telling everyone ! Please go away gravity believers, leave us alone !!!!  Now, back to the levitation guy - Please explain to us how you did it ? Was it anti-gravity shoes ? I tested those and they don't work....."
REALLY ?

Seriously, why bother

[falkor2k15]

I sincerely think its human nature to do what has been done. I.E. although he/she is doing best keep he/she off the top of the leaderboard. Leadership does this all the time. The government allows the FDA to surpress natural cures.

It would hurt the overall message of "you must increase your accuracy of predictions" to win.

Perhaps that is what is being done by said person using cycles. Increasing their accuracy by other means rather then the physical aspects.

The amount of spins thing is pure rubbish as long as you are consistent.

Priyanka has a very neat quote to describe cycles: "Isn't that what cycles are about. They give us some fixed combinations to work upon. I am not saying they will be playable, I am just saying we can limit the combinations."

I finished my numbers test, but the fixed ratios that I would have expected between every 5 repeats of the straight ups were not there - individual spins and sequences were producing inconsistent results across several data sets. However, with cycles, over the broader carpet selections I think we have greater stability - and these concepts are all new here - and we never would have guessed the magic relationship between the cycles as events based on the defining quad or dozen, etc. Priyanka is also suggesting in so many words that once we decide to go for a specific cycle length cos the stats suggest something there then we must stick to those stitched bets throughout the event otherwise the odds will change if we suddenly adapted our selection as we went along spin-by-spin. I shall move on to toying more with Priyanka's principles next in the hope of trying to solve some of these riddles as I'm done with my own personal tests... what the hell is "personal permanence" anyway?  It seems that Priyanka there is saying that she prefers to work with the entire random stream without ignoring any results or some-such.

[falkor2k15]

No one can, that's the point. Get it ? 
lol

I'm really starting to think there's no hope 'here'.
I feel like someone in a church trying to tell people that the guy on the cross never existed, that it's a sham and they are being used - meanwhile everyone in the church could care less.
People like that truly get what they deserve. People want to put their faith and energy into nonsense and try to run off the people who honestly try to point them in the right direction.
It's absurd and a waste of time. Why bother, seriously.
This should have been handled properly from the start but it wasn't.

The king of the Jews did exist - but he's not who people think he is! The clue to his identity is the reference to "Immanuel" in the birth narrative and the fact that another character named Lazarus has so many shared attributes/characteristics of Jesus. If you want to explore it further then there's many more puzzles to be solved than even trying to beat the casino!!  Start with this perhaps:
link:://s21.postimg.org/pckc150pz/ten.png
In the first century Jerusalem was controlled by an outside dynasty from Edessa/Adiabene/Osroene halfway to Iraq/Iran; the leader of the Jewish Revolt was a guy named Lazarus/Eleazar (AKA James!) whose mother was Queen Helena and he was the junior to King Izas Manu(el) IV. That explains the appearance of Persian Magi at Jesus/Immanuel's birth. The Romans crucified him on the cross whilst he was wearing the crown of thorns. Simon (Peter) and John the Baptist were the sidekicks of Eleazar in the First Jewish-Roman War. Eleazar and Simon were two of the three who got crucified on the cross, but I digress... it's more complex than VdW! 

[TurboGenius]

"If it's written - someone will believe"
turbogenius (c)2016"

[The General]

However, with cycles, over the broader carpet selections I think we have greater stability - and these concepts are all new here - and we never would have guessed the magic relationship between the cycles as events based on the defining quad or dozen, etc.

Magic relationship huh?  Lol

[TurboGenius]

lol

[thelaw]

[RouletteGhost]

was just going to post something tag team related. lol

[RouletteGhost]

general went from 13 applauds to 44

can you say "inside job"

[PeaBea65]

Magic relationship huh?

There seems to be quite a few of these happening.  Not many of them in the Roulette game.

[thelaw]

general went from 13 applauds to 44

can you say "inside job"

Exactly.........it appears only one person has access.

All hail General Steve!!!

At least everything is out in the open now................great to finally learn about Steve's "winning" method..........Roulette Forums.