Randomer Thoughts

[falkor2k15]

It's smoke and mirrors.  Someone that's more intelligent than you is attempting to dazzle you by using made up bull$shit terms and phrases.

The information she has provided is enough to fill a book - but there's no official books on the subject that discusses the kinds of principles covered herein. Even in the history of roulette forums, "Cycles" have never been discussed or barely touched upon (just check out Turner's responses to what is clearly new information). There's probably less than a handful of people in the world who can beat roulette and understand the underlying mechanics of why they are gaining edge - I think Priyanka is almost entirely alone in her endevours here (see the multiplayer leaderboard for example - I don't even see winkel's name on there; he hasn't proven himself yet) since nobody is going to believe her conspiracy theory and empty their glass unless she kills the golden goose with a winning system that nobody understands but might follow blindly to gain profit. It's the same with my research on the origin of Christianity - I'm one of the few people in the world who truly understands it; on the relevant forum there is only 1 person who even discusses it with me. Priyanka has a slightly better audience than what I do since Roulette isn't greater than Christianity - but more people are desperate to win money compared to finding out the truth about Christianity. That's why my annual leave next week is going to be entirely dedicated to testing Priyanka's lengthy personal permanence of roulette information that seems anything but random because I am one of the few people in the world who can spot what constitutes real merit and what constitutes bull$shit. The way I see it: this is a very exciting time to be alive right now in 2016. I think Priyanka's research is entirely fresh and groundbreaking! If only somebody of Bayes' qualified status as an academic would openly admit the merits of what Priyanka has described in-depth - not to mention the leaderboard evidence - then perhaps more people would be "jumping all over this topic" as Nick once said. However, I'm more concerned that Nick has the capacity for deception more than Priyanka's smoke and mirrors, so Nick might have turned to the dark side, whereas Drazen has turned over a new leaf it seems; perhaps his recent experiences with the capitalist system and losing his job in his country made him realise that we are all in the same boat and need to stick together to survive afloat. Priyanka is all for world peace too. Our only enemy here isn't ISIS or Priyanka - it's the government! And since The General came around, RouletteGhost has been promoted to a saint in my eyes.

[Tamino]

YadaYadaYada. .

[The General]

The information she has provided is enough to fill a book - but there's no official books on the subject that discusses the kinds of principles covered herein. Even in the history of roulette forums, "Cycles" have never been discussed or barely touched upon (just check out Turner's responses to what is clearly new information).

Utter nonsense.

There's probably less than a handful of people in the world who can beat roulette and understand the underlying mechanics of why they are gaining edge

I am one of them, but sorry, she most certainly is not based on what I have read.   

- I think Priyanka is almost entirely alone in her endevours here (see the multiplayer leaderboard for example - I don't even see winkel's name on there; he hasn't proven himself yet) since nobody is going to believe her conspiracy theory and empty their glass unless she kills the golden goose with a winning system that nobody understands but might follow blindly to gain profit.

The multiplayer game is just that, a game.  The random game of roulette can't be beaten in the long run.  The key is of course, to exploit the live wheel.  The game on this forum is a mix of different wheels data combined, and the occasional RNGs.  Nobody on this forum is winning consistently on the multigame.  That being said, there is a strategy to beat the multigame here, but it's a strategy that would exploit the people's ability to collect the data and enter it without duplications into the spreadsheets that they have sent Steve.  Again, beating the multigame is not the same thing as beating the real thing.  It's merely entertainment, nothing more.   

That's why my annual leave next week is going to be entirely dedicated to testing Priyanka's lengthy personal permanence of roulette information that seems anything but random because I am one of the few people in the world who can spot what constitutes real merit and what constitutes bull$shit.

No, actually you're not, otherwise you wouldn't be wasting your time testing that absurd method.     Unless....you're part of a scam.  Meaning you're playing the hint game, hoping to dupe and exploit the ignorance that runs rampant on the board among the desperate system guys.  I hope that you're not and that you're merely naïve,  inexperienced, and really suck at math.

The way I see it: this is a very exciting time to be alive right now in 2016. I think Priyanka's research is entirely fresh and groundbreaking!

Again, I hope you're just delusional and not part of a scam.

If only somebody of Bayes' qualified status as an academic would openly admit the merits of what Priyanka has described in-depth - not to mention the leaderboard evidence - then perhaps more people would be "jumping all over this topic"

You're expert is right here.  Me.   I've been playing professionally since before most of the people on this forum were born, but look, don't take my word for it.  If you'd like a truly unbiased opinion, then post the method in detail on the wizardofvegas forum or any math forum.

Sincerely,

The General

[RouletteGhost]

Utter nonsense.I am one of them, but sorry, she most certainly is not based on what I have read.   
The multiplayer game is just that, a game.  The random game of roulette can't be beaten in the long run.  The key is of course, to exploit the live wheel.  The game on this forum is a mix of different wheels data combined, and the occasional RNGs.  Nobody on this forum is winning consistently on the multigame.  That being said, there is a strategy to beat the multigame here, but it's a strategy that would exploit the people's ability to collect the data and enter it without duplications into the spreadsheets that they have sent Steve.  Again, beating the multigame is not the same thing as beating the real thing.  It's merely entertainment, nothing more.   

No, actually you're not, otherwise you wouldn't be wasting your time testing that absurd method.     Unless....you're part of a scam.  Meaning you're playing the hint game, hoping to dupe and exploit the ignorance that runs rampant on the board among the desperate system guys.  I hope that you're not and that you're merely naïve,  inexperienced, and really suck at math.

Again, I hope you're just delusional and not part of a scam.

You're expert is right here.  Me.   I've been playing professionally since before most of the people on this forum were born, but look, don't take my word for it.  If you'd like a truly unbiased opinion, then post the method in detail on the wizardofvegas forum or any math forum.

Sincerely,

The General

You care a lot more then you should

Does posting make you feel better?

[Turner]

Nice post actually Falkor....interesting read

[The General]

You care a lot more then you should

Does posting make you feel better?-RouletteGoof

Yes.  I have a big heart.  Some say that it's perhaps two sizes toO small, but I say that it's two sizes TOO BIG!

[The General]

Nice post actually Falkor....interesting read

Wow turner, just lead the sheep to the wolves. 

Have you ever heard of the term culpable? 

[denzie]

Recruit.....just start a thread with that big heart!

No vague clues or other blabla .
to the point and......shoot

[RouletteGhost]

Wow turner, just lead the sheep to the wolves. 

Have you ever heard of the term culpable?

You need a life

Stop caring about eveyone else

Clown

[denzie]

I have  read  and am still reading  posts by the GENERAL. That goes back to my days at GG ( Gamblers Glen ) back to 2006.

Just listen what the GENERAL has to  say.

Nathan Detroit

No offence but the stuff at gg fails. Just as most stuff here.

So Tamino. ..aka this aka that....I've been following you for a long time. And what comes out your mouth besides quotes. ... ec and dozen is a good bet. But any professional gambler doesn't play on those table filling bs. More than a year ago there  was a lot of older generation members here who support you. But most of them gone and admit those ec and doz will never ever win. Nope .

It is what it is and always will be 

[Turner]

You're expert is right here

But your people skills are shit
Your marketing skills even worse.
You may be an expert but you aint no communicator
There are many above you here who are much better at communicating.
Most of those are people you call idiots
Is sad really
But you keep trying. 500 posts and 50 smites says you are failing to communicate
Poor Caleb
You need to look up the history of communicating.
Learn the basics of interacting with people

[RouletteGhost]

But your people skills are shit
Your marketing skills even worse.
You may be an expert but you aint no communicator
There are many above you here who are much better at communicating.
Most of those are people you call idiots
Is sad really
But you keep trying. 500 posts and 50 smites says you are failing to communicate
Poor Caleb
You need to look up the history of communicating.
Learn the basics of interacting with people

Love you turner

[Turner]

Love you turner

Lol....I'm easy to love

[The General]

But you keep trying. 500 posts and 50 smites says you are failing to communicate

Yes, but I've got quite a bit more Karma than you do. 

[RouletteGhost]

Yes, but I've got quite a bit more Karma than you do. 

In one way or another that was rigged

But we arent babies. Lets not gloat about smites and karma