• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

WARNING: Forums often contain bad advice & systems that aren't properly tested. Do NOT believe everything. Read these links: The Facts About What Works & Why | How To Proplerly Test Systems | The Top 5 Proven Systems | Best Honest Online Casinos

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

Randomer Thoughts

Started by The General, May 13, 12:20 PM 2016

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

dimsun


Steve

Let's not take things so seriously.
"The only way to beat roulette is by increasing the accuracy of predictions"
Roulettephysics.com ← Professional roulette tips
Roulette-computers.com ← Hidden electronics that predicts the winning number
Roulettephysics.com/roulette-strategy ← Why most systems lose

falkor2k15

Quote from: Turner on Jun 17, 05:58 PM 2016
Lol....there you go again
Why do you make so many assumptions about people?.
No empathy = no friends
Empathy is near impossible to come across nowadays... it's rarer than the Holy Grail itself! Most of the population lose this skill from a very young age. It's a worse epidemic than what Ebola ever was...
"Trotity trot, trotity trot, the noughts became overtly hot! Merily, merily, merily, merily, the 2s went gently down the stream..."¸¸.•*¨*•♫♪:

denzie

Quote from: Still on Jun 17, 08:35 PM 2016
If it's true that the source of votes is not tracked, then it's probably time to pull the plug on the experiment as meaningless, since there could be two people out there, pro and con, battling to maintain equanimity on the general's karma stats.  And that would be meaningless.  Very sad too!

Bingoooooo
As spins roll off our predictions get better

praline

Can't post in random thoughts so I post HERE.


Dear , Falkor.
You are doing  a great  job but I Think it's a run in a wrong way. Try to reread first six pages of random thoughts.  Rrbb mentioned that answer is there. We must find the way to combine vdw with (for example)  Pigeon hole principle. BUT PHP can work also for cycle lengths and those are not equally likely like dozens. I will ask you to do the same CODING WORK that you've done but with vdw on Cycle lengths. I don't say I am right, but I'm trying :P
I don't have TheHolyGrail.

falkor2k15

Quote from: praline on Jul 21, 12:05 PM 2016
Can't post in random thoughts so I post HERE.


Dear , Falkor.
You are doing  a great  job but I Think it's a run in a wrong way. Try to reread first six pages of random thoughts.  Rrbb mentioned that answer is there. We must find the way to combine vdw with (for example)  Pigeon hole principle. BUT PHP can work also for cycle lengths and those are not equally likely like dozens. I will ask you to do the same CODING WORK that you've done but with vdw on Cycle lengths. I don't say I am right, but I'm trying :P
Can PHP and cycle lengths work without VdW?
"Trotity trot, trotity trot, the noughts became overtly hot! Merily, merily, merily, merily, the 2s went gently down the stream..."¸¸.•*¨*•♫♪:

falkor2k15

How to use VdW on cycle lengths? Shouldn't we use it on the defining element or wins/losses?
"Trotity trot, trotity trot, the noughts became overtly hot! Merily, merily, merily, merily, the 2s went gently down the stream..."¸¸.•*¨*•♫♪:

maestro

Law of the sixth...<when you play roulette there will always be a moron tells you that you will lose to the house edge>

Priyanka

I took the wiesbaden spin data from 1st January to 15th January and applied some of the concepts that has been discussed here in this thread and outside. I have removed zero from the equation. The results are attached. I have carefully removed one of the columns in the excel that aids in removing apples or pears ( >:D).  Those interested can study the excel.

Disclaimer : Roulette systems are subject to laws of probability. If you are not sure about the effects of it, please refer to link:://:.genuinewinner.com/truth. Don't get robbed by scammers.

NextYear

आपका बहुत बहुत धन्यवाद!

praline

Quote from: Priyanka on Jul 26, 11:41 AM 2016Don't get robbed by scammers like me
Please!!!! More scammers like you.
Thanks for new video and xlsx
I don't have TheHolyGrail.

Tomla021

Thanks Priyanka----You do understand that this will mean Overtime hours for Falkor
"No Whining, just Winning"

praline

i just dont get.. some-where it semes that you bet on ap for Y/N, somewhere for s/d. somewhere for a repeat of cycle lenght.
but i cant find other concepts  or relations.
I don't have TheHolyGrail.

Scarface

Hey Fallkor, I found something that you may want to look in to.  I was checking out the dozen cycles chart that Pri posted early in the thread.  The longest cycle would be 3, and this should happen roughly 22% of the time.  The dominant dozen in this cycle should be the same as the previous dominant 33% of the time.

But I was curious how often the last two dominant dozens to occur.  Statistically, a 3 cycle dozen should match either of the last 2 dominant dozens 66% of the time.  I've only got to spin 2178, which contained 270 cycles lengths of 3.  200 were winners, and 70 were losers....giving a 74% hit rate.  Around an 8 % return.

I'm testing this on paper, so its slow going. 

Scarface

In other words, the dominant dozen in all cycle lengths of 3 was also the dominant in one of the previous 2 cycles 74% of the time

-