• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

Almost every system has been tested many times before. Start by learning what we already know doesn't work, and why.

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

Over thinking

Started by JSG240592, May 16, 03:33 PM 2016

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

JSG240592

So many people on these roulette forums are trying to invent a system which beats roulette and gives guaranteed profits, This is an impossibility! The mathematics of the game can not be beaten.  Take a look and BALWINDER SAMBHI

link:://:.roulettestrategyreviews.com/balvinder-sambhi-roulette-system/

big scam man. Anyone that try to tell me they have a system to win at roulette is full of sh*t. What we have to do is work on a bet selection and a small progression to increase or chances of winning in a short stunt of spins (10,20 or 30 spins perhaps).That KTF system I have seen promoted on here would be so good for live roulette in order to earn £10-£20 a day. I see how it can work on FOBT because eventually it narrows down its target/s and then you start to profit.

I have attached a spread sheet which shows the makings of a good system by betting on dozens, I always bet against the last dozen seen and if I lose I increase the stake by roughly 40%-60%. I bet on all streets and rows to cover the two dozens in question. I intend to test over 100 sessions at 40spins per session.

Once tested I will figure out suitable progressions/stop loss/stop win/stop spin etc. I hoping to establish traits/average of how often dozens appear consecutively in 40spins.
This time next year rodney we'll be millionaires

denzie

Quote from: JSG240592 on May 16, 03:33 PM 2016
Anyone that try to tell me they have a system to win at roulette is full of sh*t.

Or you just can't ?



What we have is a bet selection and a small progression to increase or chances of winning

Agree



in a short stunt of spins (10,20 or 30 spins perhaps).

Or the more you play the more you make ?
Hit n run doesn't work.
As spins roll off our predictions get better

Kate

You know it is so specific, I tried some systems for myself, some of them worked, some of them didn't, the fact is still the fact, but who can tell was it luck or strategy itself? and what when people have luck in the same strategies it can be call working) it is a discussion that can never end you know

Steve

Quote from: Kate on May 20, 03:23 PM 2016I tried some systems for myself, some of them worked, some of them didn't, the fact is still the fact, but who can tell was it luck or strategy itself? and what when people have luck in the same strategies it can be call working) it is a discussion that can never end you know

Why would you sell something you weren't sure worked?

And if you understand the underlying principles that make a system ineffective or not, then you are able to properly test and know for certain if an approach or system works.
"The only way to beat roulette is by increasing the accuracy of predictions"
Roulettephysics.com ← Professional roulette tips
Roulette-computers.com ← Hidden electronics that predicts the winning number
Roulettephysics.com/roulette-strategy ← Why most systems lose

PeaBea65

Quote from: Steve on May 22, 08:18 PM 2016
Why would you sell something you weren't sure worked?

The better question is, why would you sell a system that did work?
All systems lose in the end, you can't polish a turd.

Steve

Quote from: PeaBea65 on May 22, 08:22 PM 2016why would you sell a system that did work?

Why would a car company sell cars that worked?
"The only way to beat roulette is by increasing the accuracy of predictions"
Roulettephysics.com ← Professional roulette tips
Roulette-computers.com ← Hidden electronics that predicts the winning number
Roulettephysics.com/roulette-strategy ← Why most systems lose

-