Outside the box: a different view on roulette numbers

[Person S]

flat solution yet but I can find a bet on this example.

With Ds I do not understand your strategy, if it is a game for positions in parrallel streams, I have not succeeded in it.

[Person S]

I also created derivatives of derivatives, i.e. a third parallel stream, but this only made the task more difficult, and was stupid

[ᶦ ᵃᵐ|Ä-łëx]

From derived I keep only the position of the repeat 1,2,3.

[ᶦ ᵃᵐ|Ä-łëx]

Anyway, it's a throwing puzzle all those years or I am focusing on the wrong area,
Ty for your time Person.

[Person S]

Although balance applies to 37 spins, can we say averages are also balance?

[ᶦ ᵃᵐ|Ä-łëx]

37# look that balance
(1)#15 (2)#19 (3)#3

1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
3

[Person S]

Yes Alex I understand, but for 37 spins this balance will not be constant it can be 13-13, 17-17 in the photo, etc.... I meant the balance of the average, for example, the number appeared on 200 spins, then it is out of the average, because the average is also a kind of balance and what we know what will happen. But not always in 1 cycle, it can take time... Can we argue that this is the case?

[ᶦ ᵃᵐ|Ä-łëx]

For all that we are looking at now, the most difficult thing is to apply it, I am looking inside the cycles to apply something..
Whatever y play they say balance is the key so you can say that.

[Person S]

We know there is a balance, but we don't know how many will be on one side. There is no constant value, changing all the time from cycle to cycle, 11-11, 14-14, 13-13, 11-11, yes, it will 100% happen, but what those pairs will be is unknown.

[ᶦ ᵃᵐ|Ä-łëx]

If we focus just on one game!

[winkel]

"Balance" is just another word for "Pattern".
You see it when it's there. But you can´t foresee it.

[6th-sense]

"Balance" is just another word for "Pattern".
You see it when it's there. But you can´t foresee it

depends by what your idea of balance is i suppose....

balance and pattern to me is not the same....the unhit and repeats matching at the end of a cycle although the same isn,t the balance being talked about in a balanced game as mentioned by CarpeDiem 

[winkel]

37 numbers no matter how you sort them up, will never give a balance.

the 37th number is always the disturbing one.

18 hit and 18 unhit (where is the 37th number counted?)

3 DS hit and 3 DS unhit (where is the 37th number counted.

Everybody who is eleminating the 0 is bound to fail.

[ᶦ ᵃᵐ|Ä-łëx]

"Balance" is just another word for "Pattern".
You see it when it's there. But you can´t foresee it.

Winkel is there a pattern every 37 and why 37? Does PHP principle has something to do?

[saihtaM]

28
28
15
6
21
5
10
31
25
17
21
9
1
10
35
2
31
3
26
10
33
2
22
18
32
17
30
30
3
21
19
29
16
36
6
25

unhit and 1+ they are not the same.

Yes, they are. 12 unhit numbers, 12 repeats. (There is a difference between 12 repeats and 12 repeating numbers.)