Theory Test On Double Streets/Lines

[Scarface]

Yes, Aspers casino  have had a countdown for a while now, when table gets busy the countdown gets forgotten. Now they have stopped the touch screens using the tables and installed a wheel and cards facility, on a podium. Its a bit like watching smartlive, you see the croupier,then you only see the hand spin the ball on the screen. Are you seeing a real spin or a video clip.
I was the only player there once and betting 16 #'s and one of the 16 took exactly 22 spins to hit, the 22nd bet no stake BR gone and in came the #

Yes, it is a real spin.  The touchscreens are in a semi circle with the dealer in the middle only a few feet away.  The dealers only job is to spin the wheel.  It's pretty awesome due to no long waits

[MrJ]

Stop it

Post a test of the method i created or seek refuge somewhere else

We know your opinion of it. You are entitled to that opinion. Now leave it.

I dont test other peoples methods. Dont need to, I know what will NOT work by reading the first 1-3 sentences.

Ken

[RouletteGhost]

I dont test other peoples methods. Dont need to, I know what will NOT work by reading the first 1-3 sentences.

Ken

Ok. So thats it then

Take care

[RouletteGhost]

Will post an airball trial tomorrow

Going to the local casino which only has airball

Will play with $10 units

[RouletteGhost]

Scarface, the casino you goto in cherokee it is live dealer and real wheel but everytning is on the screen right? Like stadium gaming

I like that

Sands in PA has that i believe

[RouletteGhost]

This system doesn't have a trigger. 

You could attach a trigger on the front (i.e.when an even
chance hits three consecutive times) bet the *original system*.

Yes

Throwing a random trigger into the mix might make it stronger as in missing some losses or double losses

Max loss in a row ive ever seen is 2 and ive tested this a lot

Also by adding insurance to 0 cuts the losses by half. A lot of my losses are when 0 hits

I dont advocate for progressions but im crazy enough to use one

Example

$2 units
On a loss
$10 units
On a loss
$20 units and stay there until even

Only using progression if i am below starting balance after a loss

If im at the table and observe 2 losses in a row i may then bet big as i know a 3rd will be unlikely

If i could play with quarters it would be unstoppable. High limits hurt me

[mogul397]

Ok. So thats it then

Take care

I think it's time that a moderator take notice.

[Turner]

I think it's time that a moderator take notice.

I see your point

Ken...looks like you are trying to do a "caleb" but you cant because your system is no different if you are just playing roulette within the maths boundaries that the game allows.
Caleb claims to be playing outside the maths boundaries so can say it wont work according to the different approach

Its like telling people to not eat meat...but you do allow sausages...because you eat them.

[RouletteGhost]

I see your point

Ken...looks like you are trying to do a "caleb" but you cant because your system is no different if you are just playing roulette within the maths boundaries that the game allows.
Caleb claims to be playing outside the maths boundaries so can say it wont work according to the different approach

Its like telling people to not eat meat...but you do allow sausages...because you eat them.

that's really the only point im making

Mr. J plays a "method" he says. On certain numbers that he chooses based on whats happening. So he is playing the same game we all are. He calls them hot numbers and feels he is superior because of this

Turbogenius did the same thing. slam people for methods when he himself ALSO plays methods. I happened to like TG very much. He was a much more watered down version of the above

Playing roulette with the same HE, but calling other methods silly but yours is not does not make much sense.

Perhaps we can have another sub forum similar to this. Title it "Method play" 'Method players only'. This way the veterans of the boards can feel better about their systems.

[Turner]

Its like skimming stones
I look for a dead water...no ripples and the perfect stone at the perfect angle
I will not discuss the angles I use or the shape or weight of the stone.
I will beat any of you for skim quantity and distance
And as I jump around...claiming my magnificance....my stone falls to the bottom....just like yours

[MrJ]

Caleb claims to be playing outside the maths boundaries so can say it wont work according to the different approach

Its like telling people to not eat meat...but you do allow sausages...because you eat them.

I'm lost. So the message to me is what?

Ken

[RouletteGhost]

I'm lost. So the message to me is what?

Ken

The metaphor he used is that

you say not to play systems (eat the meat) however you play certain systems (the sausage)

[Turner]

I'm lost. So the message to me is what?

Ken

I think it boils down to what Rich said in the GG post...(which was an amusing read btw)
Whats the difference between a method and a system?
Does a method overcome the HE and a system doesnt?
Im all ears

[RouletteGhost]

method/system do have different definitions

so he is right about there being a difference

however in the game of roulette once the chips are down there is no difference

[RouletteGhost]

Theres 4 ways to play roulette

-random betting

-with a set of rules (strategies, methods, systems, all same in roulette no matter how you cut the cake)

-finding a bias

-visual ballistics (predicting where it will fall based on where it was released)