Theory Test On Double Streets/Lines

[RouletteGhost]

All i can say are the facts

13 bets placed. 13 bets won. Airball play.

[MrJ]

All i can say are the facts

13 bets placed. 13 bets won. Airball play.

Those are not facts.

It could be 670 bets placed & 670 bets won, it means nothing.

Ken

[MrJ]

I actually did go to the movies on Saturday but its NOT a fact I went, correct?

Ken

[RouletteGhost]

I think you need help with definitions

If you went to the movies its a fact

What you are meaning to say is that you can't supply proof. Thats the point you are making

Everyone wear a gopro i guess

[RouletteGhost]

been testing the live wheel american spins from this forums real spins section

i have to say the only thing hurting my tests are the zeros....they are not part of double streets so when they pop up they hurt

two 0s in a row...ouch

need to consider insurance on 0...so that when they pop up its no loss...

however, even without the 0 insurance I am always in profit at some point

maybe thats why hitting and running in my live play worked so well....switching wheels after a win.....the 0 has to hit at the exact moment im at the wheel.....if i stay at one wheel and bet continuously the 0 is bound to show

two step progression has not failed me yet, WITH ONE exception, the two zeros in a row I had....

will be conservative, not betting every spin....

waiting for a virtual loss is a sure fire way i believe, but we know how that goes, wait for the VL and it takes forever to hit

[MrJ]

been testing the live wheel american spins from this forums real spins section

i have to say the only thing hurting my tests are the zeros....they are not part of double streets so when they pop up they hurt

two 0s in a row...ouch

need to consider insurance on 0...so that when they pop up its no loss...

however, even without the 0 insurance I am always in profit at some point

maybe thats why hitting and running in my live play worked so well....switching wheels after a win.....the 0 has to hit at the exact moment im at the wheel.....if i stay at one wheel and bet continuously the 0 is bound to show

two step progression has not failed me yet, WITH ONE exception, the two zeros in a row I had....

will be conservative, not betting every spin....

waiting for a virtual loss is a sure fire way i believe, but we know how that goes, wait for the VL and it takes forever to hit

RG.....I really dont want to read this entire thing so I have to ask. How many DSs are you betting? or it depends on a certain situation?

Ken

[RouletteGhost]

RG.....I really dont want to read this entire thing so I have to ask. How many DSs are you betting? or it dependss in a certain situation?

Ken

#1 - If you do not care to read then I do not care to answer

#2 - this is a system player sub forum

#3 - you have already made it clear you do not agree with the strategy

Moderator(s) please see to it then this thread stays on topic......system players only (admitted system players I should say)...thank you

[MrJ]

#1 - If you do not care to read then I do not care to answer

#2 - this is a system player sub forum

#3 - you have already made it clear you do not agree with the strategy

Moderator(s) please see to it then this thread stays on topic......system players only...thank you

If I'm asking a question about it, then it is staying on topic. Ok, I'll guess the worse situation...you are betting on 5 DSs (I'm guessing). It really makes no difference if you are betting on 1 or 5 or in between.

What is this fascination you have with INSURANCE on the zeros? So if you were betting on the first 5 DSs, it makes NO DIFFERENCE if you put your insurance on the 33/36 split, ITS THE SAME. You focus way too much on those zeros. I AM TRYING TO HELP YOU RG, I'm not out to embarrass you in any way.

Ken

[RouletteGhost]

If I'm asking a question about it, then it is staying on topic. Ok, I'll guess the worse situation...you are betting on 5 DSs (I'm guessing). It really makes no difference if you are betting on 1 or 5 or in between.

What is this fascination you have with INSURANCE on the zeros? So if you were betting on the first 5 DSs, it makes NO DIFFERENCE if you put your insurance on the 33/36 split, ITS THE SAME. You focus way too much on those zeros. I AM TRYING TO HELP YOU RG, I'm not out to embarrass you in any way.

Ken

I do not have the slightest fascination with the 0/00

The problem is, with this method a 0/00 is not part of any double street. so when they show up, or cluster, it hurts.....

a 0/00 is no different then the 4, or the 19....i understand this

the problem is i am only playing lines....so if the next two spins are 0 then 00....I lose.....the insurance is exactly that, insurance that when a non double street/line number shows, in this case the 0/00 i am ok

[MrJ]

"the problem is i am only playing lines....so if the next two spins are 0 then 00....I lose" >> Are you playing every line on every spin? If no, wouldn't you also lose (F the zeros) if other numbers NOT bet, hit? If you were not betting the 31-36 and the 34 hit, you lost but its a better loss because it was not a zero?

Ken

[RouletteGhost]

the 0/00 are not part of any line

i have been testing this extensively

for some reason playing against the line 5 spins back seems to work

the only time i have trouble is when the 0/00 repeats

the only  L L L i have had was due to 0, 0, line repeat of 5 back

the 0/00 is what did it

eh

im overthinking it...it happened once...still in plus

[RouletteGhost]

i added $4,000 to my rouleteplayers.org account balance this evening

[RouletteGhost]

i could be playing 1 number......or 35 numbers

makes no difference to me

to me its a negative expectation gamble

[Steve]

RG, as far as I can see, ken wasnt doing anything wrong here. This isnt a "dont disagree with anyone or ask questions" section. It's a section where you wont constantly get told facts again and again. Ken is not "on your case" about anything. He was being polite.

IMO Ken if you offer unwanted advice, best to just drop it especially in this section. RG, perhaps dont be so jumpy to people disagreeing with you. What ken posted is a long way from the typical speech about negative expectation.

[RouletteGhost]

Ok if we could delete the thread id be happy