Did Priyanka cheat on Steve's multiplayer game?

[falkor2k15]

Debate is taking place here:
link:://:.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=17299

History of Priyanka's position on the leader board:
link:://:.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=17208.0
(also contains references to the mathematical principles championed by Priyanka that are necessary for gaining edge)

[denzie]

I have no idea. As I don't know anything about that computer stuff.

I do feel Steve is honest. Well his JAA will tell me that answer. Let's hope for the best

[The General]

(also contains references to the mathematical principles championed by Priyanka that are necessary for gaining edge)
Share Post

"Mathematical principles"...now that's some absurdly funny  stuff right there. 

[Steve]

I know for a fact he cheated. His wins that gave the high win rate were exploits. All his other bets were ordinary with typical results with no discrepancies. Its like making lots of smaller normal bets, then suddenly massive wins betting $100 on single number. It really surprises me how gullible people can be.

And Denzie, Ive already published lots of systems and software anyone can test free. You dont need to rely on JAA trial alone.

[Steve]

quote from another player watching his results live:

After reading some of that thread I decided to follow Priyanka in the Roulette game. I've followed her five times and the results is very similiar as this. It's starts off as a slow game with small wins and small losses and then boom, out of nowhere, she makes 1-5 high wins before she quits for the day.

Honestly, I don't know what to make out of it. The way she's playing in this doesen't resemble the way she's playing in the video, W/L wise.

Do I really need to get into it more? Seriously its not hard to figure it out. Its not hard to explain why his theories about roulette are incorrect too. I dont have anything personal against him, although he is lying to people. I can only assume for ego. Its not the first time people followed blindly. Remember CEH?

[Steve]

just one example, random does NOT have limits. It just keeps going with infinite possibility. There is no sure event in 12 or any number of spins that is guaranteed to happen, exept that there are 12 possible outcomes.

[Steve]

Another one:

So If you take a set of 12 spins, you will have one of these combinations to definitely repeat. Limited. This has to happen. It is not random. It will happen always. That is the key. Identifying events that will always happen.

Incorrect. No you wont definitely have a repeat. Simply such events occur less frequently than say 11 spins, 10, 9 or 8 spins etc. Its really basic probability and math here. Its like saying you'll never get 37 spins with no repeats. Actually with enough spins, its gonna happen sooner or later. But it makes no difference at all, and you cant use the principle at all. Basically because you still havent changed the odds of the next spin. Still same odds, and same unfair payout.

[RouletteGhost]

Random may not have limits

But roulette does i believe

Ever see 40 reds in a row?

[Steve]

Nope but with enough spins it will happen too. There are no limits.

[Tamino]

Cheating like that is only possible since no real  money was involved. I have never taken Pryianka seriously and I shall NEVER ever  will..

That cat becomes a non person to me.

You Pryinaka followers have be had by an egoistic statistician . Go grass with your holy cow in  the meadow.

[RouletteGhost]

ND comes in the thread like

[Turner]

Nope but with enough spins it will happen too. There are no limits.

Thats a bit like Entropy though.

All the gas in a room could end up in the corner by probability, but it wont because there are trillions of trillions of other places the gas can be rather than that one.

It probably wont so much, its rediculous to assume it.. And 40 reds probably wont.

I wouldnt stop going in a room, with my hand on the handle half way down and think "what if this is the moment all the gas is in the corner of the room and there is no air"

[Turner]

But remember, a Poll is a Poll.

12 to 7 not cheated with 6 undecided

I work for a Japanese company. They keep polling until the right answer comes out 

They would produce certain machines based on a poll from a Tibetan monastery if they had to lol

[RouletteGhost]

Thats a bit like Entropy though.

All the gas in a room could end up in the corner by probability, but it wont because there are trillions of trillions of other places the gas can be rather than that one.

It probably wont so much, its rediculous to assume it.. And 40 reds probably wont.

I wouldnt stop going in a room, with my hand on the handle half way down and think "what if this is the moment all the gas is in the corner of the room and there is no air"

Awesome explanation that explains roulette to a T

As always clever turner

I voted undecided. Because not one individual can be 100 percent certain either way

[RouletteGhost]

I do agree with steve though that random has no limits

But for reasons we cannot explain some things just will not happen even with no limits.

42 1st dozens in a row? Nah