POSITIVE EXPECTATION ON ROULETTE CAN BE PROVED MATHEMATICALLY!

[RouletteGhost]

Its not a job. I dont get paid.

No rules broke by Angel here. Thats my job as a mod. See if any rules have been broken.

One rule here is "No personal attacks".

You just personally attacked me and I take offence, so you are on moderation.

Your posts need approving.

I think that the generals idea of a good moderator is preventing free speech and only allowing what he agrees with to be posted

The general isn't fit to even post here

Theres an AP forum somewhere

Thank god hes posting less

[Blue_Angel]

By the way...you sounded like De Niro...."you talkin to me?"

Yeah...one of my favorite actors. 
Sorry, didn't notice the username above quotes.

I need to express my opinion, perhaps not correct, perhaps not popular, but if I'm insulting nobody what's wrong with it??
When I said "show me the money!" I was joking, I've realized that some persons cannot understand a joke even when it falls on their head!

There are many of you who consider a roughly 50/50 chance bet as a holy grail, I've never understood why this is "holy grail" or even close to it.
It's like saying wait approximately 24 spins and bet the "red" or the "black", it's very hard for me to see where is the advantage of such bet!

Let's say I've 18 sleepers and bet them once, on average 6 of them will come, BUT these 6 (or more if 1 or more of them repeats) are within next 13 spins, not a specific spin.

In other words you are aiming for approximately 6 wins out of 13 bets on 18 numbers.
And this is the average expectation, far from grail in my opinion!

Then you start all over again the same thing with the same probability, or continue for the next even chance bet of these numbers which appeared once with those which appeared twice and so on...
Could anyone explain what this has to do with "holy grail" of gambling?!

Perhaps you disagree, you don't like my opinion, but this is how I see it.
What it's strange is the popularity, otherwise it would be just another way to bet a roughly even chance selection.

[Blue_Angel]

I admire those who dare to be different, those who dare to think different.

It's because out of such individuals the real pioneers are being borned, intuitive improvisation is the source of the evolution and progress.

The world doesn't need more "parrots" & "monkeys", but more out of the box thinkers.

Closer to my ideal are the examples of Ken and Richard Farrow.

[MrJ]

One rule here is "No personal attacks".

I really wish this RULE was more clear. Is it how the mods (or Steve) VIEW IT AS? So if I'm called "Kenny Bear", is that a personal attack? If not, why? If not, then its okay if I call someone else..... "Falkor Bear"? (sorry Falkor, I needed an example).

What if a member is threatened with PHYSICAL HARM? I assume posts would then need approval, that only makes sense? Are SOME foul names okay while other foul names are not? etc.

Ken

[RouletteGhost]

I really wish this RULE was more clear. Is it how the mods (or Steve) VIEW IT AS? So if I'm called "Kenny Bear", is that a personal attack? If not, why? If not, then its okay if I call someone else..... "Falkor Bear"? (sorry Falkor, I needed an example).

What if a member is threatened with PHYSICAL HARM? I assume posts would then need approval, that only makes sense? Are SOME foul names okay while other foul names are not? etc.

Ken

The generals been askin for it

He pokes at turner often. Calling him a bad mod and that he cant do his job

He was askin for it if ya ask me

Sometimes the general just needs to keep his mouth shut

Hes been restricted on several forums

He just doesnt understand hobbyists dont care what hes preaching and he just disrupts forums

Turner is easy on him. Betselection gave him the boot up the ass

[MrJ]

The generals been askin for it

He pokes at turner often. Calling him a bad mod and that he cant do his job

He was askin for it if ya ask me

Sometimes the general just needs to keep his mouth shut

Hes been restricted on several forums

He just doesnt understand hobbyists dont care what hes preaching and he just disrupts forums

Turner is easy on him. Betselection gave him the boot up the ass

Neat post but....

A) I wasn't asking you.

B) These QUESTIONS pertain to *ANY* member and my curiosity has little to do with General sir. I'm looking more at the CONSISTENCY.

Ken

[denzie]

I really wish this RULE was more clear. Is it how the mods (or Steve) VIEW IT AS? So if I'm called "Kenny Bear", is that a personal attack? If not, why? If not, then its okay if I call someone else..... "Falkor Bear"? (sorry Falkor, I needed an example).

What if a member is threatened with PHYSICAL HARM? I assume posts would then need approval, that only makes sense? Are SOME foul names okay while other foul names are not? etc.

Ken

Probably depending on the situation. Maybe the person Kenny bear was a complete jurk before and had it coming?  Just thinking out loud. Maybe that same person started a personal vendetta on other forums ? Who knows.  Maybe that person has no idea what he actually says or how he behaved and then is surprised by what's coming to him. No idea though. Can be many things. But surely a person that get banned or need post approval etc...won't care to much and surely not gonna keep whining on and on and on and on .... like the duracel bunny 


Kenny bear is cute though 

[Tomla021]

you can call someone "bear" but "poopsie" is off limits and crosses the line!

[Blue_Angel]

you can call someone "bear" but "poopsie" is off limits and crosses the line!

What is a "poopsie"? A mix of poops and pussy??

[MrJ]

Probably depending on the situation. Maybe the person Kenny bear was a complete jurk before and had it coming?  Just thinking out loud. Maybe that same person started a personal vendetta on other forums ? Who knows.  Maybe that person has no idea what he actually says or how he behaved and then is surprised by what's coming to him. No idea though. Can be many things. But surely a person that get banned or need post approval etc...won't care to much and surely not gonna keep whining on and on and on and on .... like the duracel bunny 


Kenny bear is cute though 

Nope, simply looking for CONSISTENCY. We'll see if I get answers to my questions. My guess, no.

"Probably depending on the situation" >> Who defines this? So in other words...in one situation, a person can be called a dumb piece of s**t (its ok) and then maybe 24 hours later, a different member is called a dumb piece of s**t and that would NOT be ok. Do you mean like that?

"Maybe the person Kenny bear was a complete jurk before and had it coming?" >> So, lets examine this. Again, WHO defines this? If a person "had it coming" (and whose definition are we using?) then its OK to ATTACK them, correct? So, hey Bob, you are a stupid fu***n co*k suckin little bi**h. This is alright because after all, he "had it coming" to him, correct? Your words Denzie not mine.

"Maybe that same person started a personal vendetta on other forums?" >> Steve has already posted his thoughts on that. Anything that happens on OTHER boards is out of bounds. Meaning, tough s**t. What happens at OTHER boards (not affiliated with Steve) has zero effect HERE but if that rule does get CHANGED, I'm cool with that as long as everything stays CONSISTENT.

Ken

[MrJ]

I'm not done....I see through the talking in the third person act from Denzie directed to ME but not using my name. I repeat, I am OKAY with it as long as, when I do it BACK (and I will), then its okay to do so. That would NOT be labeled as "bickering" (cough) or attacking, correct?

Why? Because the *FIRST* person doing it should of been punished prior to it going any further.

Ken

[RouletteGhost]

What is a "poopsie"? A mix of poops and pussy??

[denzie]

Sure thing Ken 
I'll leave you to it ... enjoy 








And on and on and on and on ........

[MrJ]

Sure thing Ken 
I'll leave you to it ... enjoy 








And on and on and on and on ........

Simple questions from Ken.  No arguing on my part, no causing s**t, just questions  but relax, I'm sure this  will go no where anyways. (call it a hunch).    If things dont get answered but my POINT somewhat gets across, I'll take it. 

Ken

[RouletteGhost]

Ken

Don't you think all this is going a bit too far

You been around a long time

Have you graduated to the next level? Where if you stay on a strategy forum its nothing but arguing because you are now past all this? Onto the next level for you? No strategy just playing the way you do so no reason to be here?

Beginners will come. Newbies will come. Hobbysists will come

Coexist or move on?

Enough of all this

You must accept the newbies and accept that people create methods or this forum will not be a walk in the park for you

Goes for general. Goes for TG. I like TG!