Yet another system recipe

[Still]

Maybe check out the "outside the box" topic and get familiar with the "positions" stream first? You familiar with that? This is also covered in the Birthday Problem topics.

Will check it out, thanks. 

[falkor2k15]

So far my best findings was actually this morning and last night thanks to praline's tip off. Another good finding was that position 1 (Super Repeat) is tied up with higher repeat levels. I sense that you've missed some key topics over the past few weeks:
1) Priyanka's spreadsheet posted in the turbo topic regarding position 1 bets in the top repeat level
2) My topic that contained a demonstration of edge
But that edge has now been superseded thanks to praline! Incidentally, I sent him an email, but he's very busy working all the time, so I don't get a reply back from him very often. He's a good mathematician though - always shows his workings! Worth asking around if you get stuck...

In the end I predict that the best possible edge will be obtained through a positions based system like this one - but one that utilizes parachuting so that you can end up with all parlayed chips on that single winning number.

[praline]

Incidentally, I sent him an email, but he's very busy working all the time, so I don't get a reply back from him very often. He's a good mathematician though - always shows his workings! Worth asking around if you get stuck...

...

[praline]

I think IF I add a sentence like this

"For prices and hints, send me an email..."

I'll be rich soon. 

[falkor2k15]

Back to "Yet another system recipe"... I'm now ready and in a position to ask Priyanka a question...

Are the "created dozens" being ordered based on variance avoidance perhaps, but with the intention of recovering whichever type of dozen has fallen behind, i.e. deficit recovery based on outcomes that are not equally likely?

[falkor2k15]

Is the ordering/re-arrangement being done perhaps based on Same/Different? "Same" is of course rrbb's position 1...

[Priyanka]

I can't say i expect anyone to divulge a systematic method with an edge, but always wonder whether generosity is the appropriate response to things that are unclear. 

Still - I might have overlooked this topic and your questions on this system. If I can do anything to make it clear I will. Pls shoot.


And to Falkor, yes it is some kind of variance avoidance but not on dozens, but on cycle lengths.

[falkor2k15]

Still - I might have overlooked this topic and your questions on this system. If I can do anything to make it clear I will. Pls shoot.


And to Falkor, yes it is some kind of variance avoidance but not on dozens, but on cycle lengths.

OK thanks! So with your variance avoidance technique does it require dependency and individually placed dynamic bets like your journey videos - or does it rely on playing catch-up in the long run? Traditional variance avoidance techniques don't incorporate non-random - but here you at least have the non-random cycles stream?

[Priyanka]

This system is all about triggers, past spins and repeaters. It is just a mechanical system which loses as per the laws of roulette. It is not about cycles or none of that crap from random thoughts thread.

Falkor - as soon as you put the words variance avoidance, it no longer stays non random. Non random is based on events that definitely happen within a stated set of spins. Non random leaves out any other possibility. 

This system is about playing catching up with the awareness that the catching up may not happen and is a fallacy.

[falkor2k15]

Yeah, it seems that Non-Random events can end up becoming random events; for example:
CL1 = 33% maths expectation
CL2 = 44% maths expectation
CL3 = 22% maths expectation

CL1 vs. CL2+3 is just the same as playing 1 dozen (33%) vs. 2 dozens (66%).

If CL2+3 fell behind CL1 then we would expect CL2+3 to catch up - or 2 dozens to catch up with 1 dozen.

So the non-random part only applies up to the completion of a cycle. So why would we use cycle lengths with variance avoidance and playing catch up?

[Priyanka]

So the non-random part only applies up to the completion of a cycle. So why would we use cycle lengths with variance avoidance and playing catch up?

For fun or to get satisfaction that one is trying something complex which could have been done simply.

[praline]

For fun or to get satisfaction that one is trying something complex which could have been done simply.

It can be made simple as you showed us in quads videos. But still, according to my tests, this betting plan is incomplete. I never coded this "method" (too complex, because of number charting, as on the 8th spin we can decied to move a nunber from one dozen to other for creating more cl3) but the same strategy is shown on  Quads videos, and in the long run it gives negative results.
So something else is needed, i didn't figured out what is this "something", but i will be more then happy to read some new thoughts from people that are standing on the same stair with me.

[INTERCEPTOR]

but the same strategy is shown on  Quads videos, and in the long run it gives negative results.
So something else is needed, i didn't figured out what is this "something", but i will be more then happy to read some new thoughts from people that are standing on the same stair with me.

Ok where is quads video maybe I can help you?

[praline]

Here
link:s://youtu.be/4dVbiXMIipI

[INTERCEPTOR]

This is mix low-hi, red, streets, 2nd dozen it can not be done on this way, and it is no zero roulette, too complicated. As you say not long run system, you will have better results playing only LOW-HI WITH DOZENS. So try to remove betting on red and streets and do some tests.