1 unit profit "guaranteed" per session

[Blue_Angel]

Grab a pen and a paper and write down each number that hits, alternatively write all numbers from 0 to 36 and each time a number hits cross it out or circle it with your pen.

Continue to do so till there are only 2 numbers remaining which have not appeared yet, at that time bet everything else except these two numbers, for only one spin.

It costs mostly in time, but a guaranteed 2.8% return on your investment.

Cheers, to your success!

[Proofreaders2000]

This is 'gambler's fallacy'.  You can still lose 35 units.

[Blue_Angel]

This is 'gambler's fallacy'.  You can still lose 35 units.

Yes, I didn't say that it will never lose BUT that the profit will overcome its losses.

Does anyone want to simulate 1,000,000 results or more?

Please be my guest!

[denzie]

So what your saying it's a winner on the long run ?

[Blue_Angel]

So what your saying it's a winner on the long run ?

Yes because it doesn't pick any 35 random numbers, but bets against the last 2 frozen numbers.

In order to lose it has to hit those 2 frozen numbers back to back, in 2 consecutive spins!

Those 2  frozen numbers could be missing for hundreds of spins and suddenly will arrive 1 after the other?!

[denzie]

bet everything else except these two numbers, for only one spin.

So if u say to make it lose. We need back to back loss . So you bet twice if first bet lost ?

[Blue_Angel]

So if u say to make it lose. We need back to back loss . So you bet twice if first bet lost ?

No, you bet only once when there have left only 2 numbers which have not appeared.

Eventually all numbers appear sooner or later, but here we are betting against 2 specific numbers to hit in a specific spin!

[denzie]

Ok thx 

I'm not need to point out it will lose right ?
But thx 

[goldrosen]

You'll need to bet nonstop for approximately 60 hours to recover a back to back loss on a air-ball machine roulette,not to mention you might face another back to back loss again when in the recovery play. bad idea lol..

[Blue_Angel]

Was just an idea

[denzie]

Was just an idea

I've noticed you ain't scared of progressions. Why don't you just bet the numbers that have 2 hits going for a third hit with a progression?  Or flat . Will work a lot better.

[Blue_Angel]

I've noticed you ain't scared of progressions. Why don't you just bet the numbers that have 2 hits going for a third hit with a progression?  Or flat . Will work a lot better.

I've tried it already long time ago, if you use a progression you'll lose rarely but badly...!

Unfortunately I've seen 18 different numbers (unique) before 1 of them becomes a repeater and on another occasion I've seen 18 repeaters before one of them becoming three-peater...!

Obviously you have not played and/or tried what you have suggested long enough.

[denzie]

Obviously you have not played and/or tried what you have suggested long enough.

Don't we all ? 
There's not one system here that wins long term. The only thing that brings a little light is to measure the variance. Even though it's no hg also....it sure cuts the losses a whole lot more. 

That's the only thing I do these days.    (with my parlay)

[Blue_Angel]

There's not one system here that wins long term.

Don't be so sure about that...out of the billions of people around the planet don't you think that there is a very good possibility to even 1 of them has a HG method?

I think this is something really possible, in fact I estimate the individuals who have long term winning methods to be on 1 to 1 ratio with the casinos worldwide.

The aftermath here is never to judge everything by your own standards, furthermore everyone, even casinos, have a personal demon (nemesis) to live with.

It's the way of life to keep the balance through diversity...

[RouletteGhost]

Whether you wait for 34 numbers to hit then bet all but 2 that haven't hit

OR

Walk up to the table and bet 34 random numbers

I am pretty sure the win rate and seldom loss will be equivalent

This is no different then just betting 34 numbers

No need to wait