Why random results are NOT independent

[Turner]

ten times the SAME is NOT as possible as 10 different numbers

Obviously....but what ever 10 do come out has the same probability.

Do you get that bit?

[Bayes]

If anything is possible then why don't we see the same number for 10 consecutive spins?

This  is the HG. Just double up 10 times on any 36 numbers. Thanks BA!

[Steve]

BA your logic is wrong, and exact details why have been explained by multiple members but you are still not understanding it.

Have you ever seen the sequence 1,9,34,7,2? I bet you haven't. Historically it has happened as often as 1,2,3,4,5. Just test with billions of rng spins and see for yourself. You are still not understanding this.

You are stuck in classic gamblers fallacy. Don't believe it? Just test. Use the free software i published

[Blue_Angel]

This  is the HG. Just double up 10 times on any 36 numbers. Thanks BA!

By the way, holy grail exists and I've it!

[caspian]

It's hard to find at Europe, let alone rest of the world.

Every casino in the UK must pay the La Partage rule by law.

[Blue_Angel]

By the way, holy grail exists and I've it!

349,289 spins
3,000 units initial capital
5,155 units net profit 171.83% ROI
3,211 units max drawdown

Out of the Blue...

[Priyanka]

3,211 units max drawdown

That summarises it .  Thx for sharing.

[RouletteGhost]

By the way, holy grail exists and I've it!

How much are you selling it for

[Blue_Angel]

That summarises it .  Thx for sharing.

You focus on what you want to see and missing the ''big picture''.

The big picture says 5,155 units net and as 5,155 is greater than 3,211 it says a lot about balance between risk and reward.

Try your fallacious method for 350,000 spins and then come back to tell me what's summarize all!

Sorry, not for sale.

[RouletteGhost]

Sorry, not for sale.

Oh! How disappointing!!

[Blue_Angel]

BA your logic is wrong, and exact details why have been explained by multiple members but you are still not understanding it.

Have you ever seen the sequence 1,9,34,7,2? I bet you haven't. Historically it has happened as often as 1,2,3,4,5. Just test with billions of rng spins and see for yourself. You are still not understanding this.

You are stuck in classic gamblers fallacy. Don't believe it? Just test. Use the free software i published

Hey Steve, how about these numbers?

349,289 spins
3,000 units initial capital
5,155 units net profit 171.83% ROI
3,211 units max drawdown

[The General]

349,289 spins
3,000 units initial capital
5,155 units net profit 171.83% ROI
3,211 units max drawdown-Blue Angel

It depends.  Are you in this to make money, or for some other reason?

Here's my ten cents.  It's paltry.  I wouldn't cross the street to play if the results were that dismal.   The draw down is also garish.  It looks like just another up as you lose progression.

[denzie]

Nice graphs. ...

But assume you play 1000 spins a day online which is a lot....you get dd of 10-20 days before your out the hole. How is this playable? 

B&M it would take .....well to long

[Blue_Angel]

Nice graphs. ...

But assume you play 1000 spins a day online which is a lot....you get dd of 10-20 days before your out the hole. How is this playable? 

B&M it would take .....well to long

Spot on Denzie!
In B&M casinos is not playable due to lot of waiting and tracking, not impossible but very hard.
That's why I'm keeping the bot always on to online casinos, milks them on autopilot and I'm just checking it once per day.
For B&M casinos I'm using 2 other methods.

[RouletteGhost]

So will there be an explanation of play, or just gloating?