The full leaderboard

[denzie]

Where can i see the complete leaderboard? (more then 20)

[denzie]

nevermind. found it

[nottophammer]

If you look on the board, theres some good players still using the 1st bankroll.
The ? is r they still playing as they seem to never move
188.   BlueAngel
210.   tischclan2  just a few, as all others are at house edge or worse

[plolp]

nevermind. found it

How do we do it?

thanks

[Steve]

:.rouletteplayers.org/leaderboard

[nottophammer]

None of them anygood reset BR to many times. Now if you where top on one BR, thats different

[Steve]

Resetting bankroll doesnt do any good to the win rate.

What we find (as expected) is the more someone plays, the closer they get to the expected results which is about 0.97 win rate. Wally gator is doing best last time I looked. I'm curious to know what his system is (if he's here and reading).

I can see bets made but it is for debugging and finding cheating loopholes, not tracking systems. Its no different to any casino. On this note, I'm aware of someone claiming to have a brilliant winning HG system, but I've been told they are secretly claiming they refuse to prove their system works by testing on the multiplayer game because all bets are tracked, as if I was going to steal their system. They use another game as "proof". And that game is full of people on their leaderboard winning millions. It would be great if every casino had multiple players winning millions. That isnt reality though. It looks more like an excuse to avoid fair and unbiased spins. And I've got news for that person. Every online casino tracks bets. If I wanted to reverse engineer a system, I would design the software to track everything to make it easier.  If I believed any player had the HG, I wqould plainly ask them and offer to pay them for it.

[nottophammer]

Reset of BR tells you that the player/s method is no good, ok perhaps 1 or 2 resets, but if they just keep resetting,then they are fooling themselves, they dont have an endless BR, if you did why would you play and lose the money. Ah Mr Rooney 

[INTERCEPTOR]

Well notto I think you are wrong because winrate system is not fair so we have to deal with two problems, first a roulette itself is hard casino game and second unfair winrate system so this is two reasons of your bad positions and 100 nick names on multiplayer game. 

[Steve]

The winrate formula is neither fair or unfair. It is just amount won vs amount lost, like it in with your bankroll.

The ranking formula applies to everyone, is fair, and properly balanced. To be at the top you need high win rate, with comparatively significant amount of spins and amount wagered. The rank cannot be based on win rate alone or players would create multiple accounts, then try to bet high and win big to rank high. It happened before. But cheating that way isnt possible with the algorithm i designed.

If anyone has a better formula, be specific and open a discussion.

[nottophammer]

MJ had TTTKA2 in top spot, but then went crazy with the units. Then start something different so use a new BR, so you can see if its going in right direction, why just keep getting a reset on BR you're fooling yourselves.
Now i'm using monikers, NINE,NINE,NINE and justinten, oh and by the way still on the starting BR.

[nottophammer]

Justinten just moved up from 233 to 214 

[INTERCEPTOR]

Notto you are trapped in Steves fake unfair winrate system so you can never be in top 20 playing  on this way. 

[nottophammer]

not if you get to#1 on the one bank roll

[Steve]

MumboJumbo, like I said, win rate is just win vs loss. How is that unfair?

I assume you mean the ranking system. Read what i wrote. Should we just let new members with 5 big wins rank first? Of course not.

Its easy to criticise, but can you suggest a better algorithm? Turbo didnt rank high so he complained too,but didnt offer a better and fairer algorithm.