If you really want to know what the longest run could be on the ECs...

[ati]

It will never reach zero; you can always cut anything in half, even a half from a half, ad infinitum

That would mean two objects can be infinite close to each other. But is that the reality? The two atoms eventually have to touch. Can the distance be smaller than the size of an atom? I'm sure there is some scientific explanation to this, but it is as hard to believe. Just like it is hard to believe that 40 EC repeats would ever happen.

[RouletteGhost]

That would mean two objects can be infinite close to each other. But is that the reality? The two atoms eventually have to touch. Can the distance be smaller than the size of an atom? I'm sure there is some scientific explanation to this, but it is as hard to believe. Just like it is hard to believe that 40 EC repeats would ever happen.

Absolute 0 fascinated me in physics class

What scientists think halpen at absolute 0.

Not really relevant to this though

[psimoes]

You can split atoms. Now particles, there will come a time when someone asks "what are particles made of" and someone will reply "we reached a point where we can say that particles are undoubtly made of several other things, we don´t know what they are yet but we´re getting there".
Unless the Microcomos is finite. Which means finite data to be computed, thus totally predictable in some distant future.

[RouletteGhost]

Theres parts of this universe where physics as we know it does not work

Crazy to fathom

[The General]

Theres parts of this universe where physics as we know it does not work

Crazy to fathom-RouletteGhost

Yep, like on roulette system forums.

[denzie]

Just like it is hard to believe that 40 EC repeats would ever happen.

We only believe it if we see it but...if im not mistaken 33 has happened b4 in a B&M . Could be 31 or 35. I forgot. But its possible. Huge winning night for the casino that night. As most didnt follow but bet against it. 

Cheers

[psimoes]

So for dozens/columns you divide 3 by 3 and so on?

[nottophammer]

Probability shows there could be 100 reds, but its so high its negligible

I dont look up to see if an asteroid is heading directly for me every time I go out,  but it has a probability.

Most likely same as 100 reds.yes 100 red manc's coming at ya 

Its silly to consider it.

[Turner]

yes 100 red manc's coming at ya

It would be hard to find 100 red mancs,

100 c***ney reds, easy

[Steve]

You need to stop thinking along the lines of how many times in a row. Focus on the probability of the NEXT spin. Why? Because unless you have an edge, it's all the same.

Can you base a system on 10 consecutive reds not happening? Yes but it wont work and is exactly the same as betting on any other sequence. This is just simple stuff not being understood.