visual ballistics

[Roulettebeater]

Well the earth is flat, duh!

It's been proven on the internet.

Is it ?
Then put yourself with the flatearthers

[The General]

M;

this is not good enough

Last time the General got nosey in Gzgzbee topic

Notto,

Regarding the games above, on how many spins did you bet?

I don't see the number of spins played on the MPR anymore. 

[nottophammer]

I don't see the number of spins played on the MPR anymore. 

It's on there, if you can't see that then ask your best mate stevie poo's

[The General]

It's on there, if you can't see that then ask your best mate stevie poo's

I think the MPR should show the following.

1. Total spins bet
2. Edge
3. Total action 
4.Total win/loss
5. Current Bankroll
6. Ranking

[nottophammer]

You missed the best one thou.

How many re-sets to Bank Roll

[The General]

You missed the best one thou.

How many re-sets to Bank Roll

I don't see a problem with resets.

I also think you should be able to have as many accounts as you want so you can continually test new ideas or mess around without corrupting one of your more focused methods of play.  For example if I played more I might have a General1, General2, General3, General4,...etc.

Of course it might eat up too much space having so many more accounts.  And we need to remember that it's a free game that's being provided at a cost to the Admin.  So we have to be cool about what we ask for rather than demanding this or that.

[nottophammer]

I don't see a problem with resets.

Well i do. Most players would have limited BR, so they would be classed as compulsive gamblers.

You condem RNG, but on the FOBT they give exactly the same result as airball and live wheels. Even your posted starburts played to the averages perfect; the 15 non-hit in spins 11-40

Even a form of Turbo does well on MPR, bet the decison has to be made do you play on for bigger reward and meet Steve's table limit.

[The General]

Well i do. Most players would have limited BR, so they would be classed as compulsive gamblers.

You condem RNG, but on the FOBT they give exactly the same result as airball and live wheels. Even your posted starburts played to the averages perfect; the 15 non-hit in spins 11-40

Even a form of Turbo does well on MPR, bet the decison has to be made do you play on for bigger reward and meet Steve's table limit.

RNG isn't the same as some airball machines.

[nottophammer]

RNG isn't the same as some airball machines.

But things you dismiss would show the same; the old average of repeats 1-3-5-7 and 30

[The General]

But things you dismiss would show the same; the old average of repeats 1-3-5-7 and 30

Let me clarify, for you it's the same, but for bias and other reasons it's much different.

[Roulettebeater]

link:s://giphy.com/gifs/cat-loop-Alfb46lOc1kVG

Like that you can learn visual ballistic

[Roulettebeater]

.

[Bigbroben]

Thanks, I appreciate it.

Süss...

[Bigbroben]

Does anyone know about this E-book about VB: Fly me to the Moon?

They offer pdf book, skype training.

Worth it?

link:s://:.amazon.com/Fly-Moon-Visual-Roulette-System-Experience-ebook/dp/B00K5LD5A6

[ego]

If you want to learn physics you should visit another forum.
There is public advantage play forum with roulette computer discussion and visual ballistic.
And many interesting topics to read.

I have some parts of the Fly Me To The Moon and would not recommend it.

If you are smart you can get complete working visual ballistic method for free that show you how to estimate rotor and ball speed.
The problem comes when you should find a tilted wheel and how to deal with ball jumps reaching half the wheel.
But there is a solution to everything.

You could read about problems ten years ago where AP people complain about erratic ball jumps and difficulty to find tilted wheels.
Today is much harder to win using visual ballistics.

Cheers