visual ballistics

[The General]

Roulettebeater,

YES, There's more than one way to beat the wheel.  I'm aware of all of them.

But what you're doing is not visual ballistics. 

By the way, I own wheels, and a gazillion slow motion high def videos of them.

[Roulettebeater]

Roulettebeater,

YES, There's more than one way to beat the wheel.  I'm aware of all of them.

But what you're doing is not visual ballistics. 

By the way, I own wheels, and a gazillion slow motion high def videos of them.

My ingenious machine predicted the correct 1/8th of the wheel in 7 of 33 trials giving an expected yield of 56%
AND ON LIVE WHEELS !

it's blowing mind, believe me... the system uses historical VB charts, machine learning ..all in one..
the result is awesome

[The General]

My ingenious machine predicted the correct 1/8th of the wheel in 7 of 33 trials giving an expected yield of 56%
AND ON LIVE WHEELS !

it's blowing mind, believe me... the system uses historical VB charts, machine learning ..all in one..
the result is awesome

Did you test it for only 33 spins?

[nottophammer]

No general only 22 spins


I don't need that many as you've seen on the FOBT in the bookies today +83

[The General]

One spin.  + 106!

[nottophammer]

General those time tables are good.

[The General]

General those time tables are good.

So?  They're just a statistically relevant as my data set!   I won 106 units!  However, you only won 83 units.

My point is playing 22 spins and winning is really no more relevant than playing only one spin and winning. 

[nottophammer]

where's the picture of you and the blinkers



This will do

[The General]

where's the picture of you and the blinkers



This will do

That gif is totally under utilized! 

By the way, from an awesome tv series on AMC

[nottophammer]

Loved it general; the gold standard the old Turbo 

[The General]

I just killed it on the biased wheel rather than using Turbo's losing system. 

[nottophammer]

But General; so would me and Nimo

I'm not allowed to say; but i guess you could PM, Nimo
But i know his answer to you.

[The General]

No, you and Nimo wouldn't have won dirt.   I know Turbo's method.  It didn't work for Turbo either.  That's why he doesn't post anymore.

By the way, that's just a malfunctioning reader board. 

I always laugh out loud though when I see people posting one reader board or a short session as though it's proof that their system is of any value. 

[nottophammer]

I know Turbo's method.

General I’ve got to this point by using three types of repeat methods. And not one is probably how Turbo gets his repeats.
But Nimo got to see what I meant in one of the topics for repeats and showed me his way, and yes that marquee would be a win; win, win, and win.
If you’ve a brain you can see a repeat method wins all over that board.

[Roulettebeater]

general

Why you think that technology and machine learning can’t simulate wheel and ball speed ?

Why you think this can happen only with eyes ? Didn’t you hear of machine learning ?