visual ballistics

[Roulettebeater]

Steve

Again, my advice to you, never judge too early especially if you dont have enough information.

Never mind, I don’t want to position myself neither against you nor against anyone here.

All what I have is a big head full of information on computing, statistics and science, big nose and some grey hairs!

Besides all that, I have studied the game since years, I have done lots of analysis and studied every part of the wheel, I gathered stats, I ran simulations, I tracked every change... I automated almost everything.

Back to point, your computers are smart,no doubt about that. But what if i tell you that you can get similar results by applying same physics laws without computer? Will you believe me ? Well I don’t care, but believe me if you study the nature of the game you will see that it has closed horizon, it doesn’t run without limitations !

If you study millions of spins and ran extensive simulations, you will see that the game has repetitive peaks, any system can do it !

My system can overcome the House edge

[Winner]

@ Steve just dawned on me on why in the world you would have a forum like this when your all about vb an computers .why not hav  a forum on what you specialize in  .beats me.

[The General]

Winner,

You might want to add some more letters and words to your question.

I suspect his answer is because he's hunting and keeping tabs on opportunities, like I am.   

[Roulettebeater]

Winner,

You might want to add some more letters and words to your question.

I suspect his answer is because he's hunting and keeping tabs on opportunities, like I am.

Hunting what ? Dating girls  ?

[The General]

Hunting what ? Dating girls  ?

No, hunting deer.

[Steve]

Winner, ive answered this before numerous times. This is a roulette forum. Not specifically an AP or system forum.

Yes i use the forums to headhunt. I use it for advertisimg too. I also have :.gamblersforum.com and recently started using it for lone players to collaborate and form teams to join my service program at :.roulettephysics.com/computer-service/ most of it is done in private chats.

Im neither an AP or system fan. Just focused on what works. It not complicated.

[Bigbroben]

Links!!!

Send 'em all.  I'll click everywhere!

[Winner]

Winner, ive answered this before numerous times. This is a roulette forum. Not specifically an AP or system forum.

Yes i use the forums to headhunt. I use it for advertisimg too. I also have :.gamblersforum.com and recently started using it for lone players to collaborate and form teams to join my service program at :.roulettephysics.com/computer-service/ most of it is done in private chats.

Im neither an AP or system fan. Just focused on what works. It not complicated.

Ok

[Roulettebeater]

Winner,

Don’t blame Steve for this
Actually many people think that roulette can be beaten with systems so that’s why you find here lots of threads on systems and very frew threads on AP

[Winner]

Winner,

Don’t blame Steve for this
Actually many people think that roulette can be beaten with systems so that’s why you find here lots of threads on systems and very frew threads on AP

There’s no blame  just an observation.

[judgeholdem1848]

A computer can get a 200% edge betting 1 number,

Hi, new here, but been around the gambling forums for quite some time. 

I've heard similar claims made.  But the maximum theoretical edge that conventional means can produce on even older wheels for European Roulette is going to range from around 35-40%.  To achieve anything significantly higher, it would be necessary to use extremely sophisticated timing equipment, probably laser-based, as well as having an extensive model of terminal ball behavior that is vastly beyond what we might expect anyone but end-boss computational geniuses or those rich enough to hire them to come up with. 

That said, I am aware of players who made novel and important mathematical discoveries that they never bothered publishing because it would have spilled the beans on their exquisite model for beating Game X.  But having a rough idea of what it would take to achieve a 200% edge, I'm more than a little skeptical that such an operation could be realistically carried out in casino conditions or at all. 

Are you absolutely certifying that edges that high are realistically and routinely achievable by anyone currently playing?

[judgeholdem1848]

If you study millions of spins and ran extensive simulations, you will see that the game has repetitive peaks, any system can do it !

Backtesting N strategies will give you the maximum expected mean of N strategies.  Unless you're systematically controlling for data mining bias using White's Reality Check, bootstrapping or similar, you are going to be suffering from it gravely.