Random Thoughts - 1 Year Anniversary

[falkor2k15]

Random Thoughts one year on…

Are we any closer to figuring out the perpetrators of 9/11? Are we any closer to figuring out how to play Roulette within a Non-Random/Non-Probabilistic framework and how master Priyanka (schooled under the immortal Manrique via grandmaster Nono Santelli) tripled his fun chips to become undisputed leader of online roulette? Some people refused to believe Pri had actually achieved such success through genuine mathematical merit â€" even going as far as to accuse him of cheating; the general consensus, however, was that Pri is and remains innocent â€" so there are supporters out there even if they haven’t come out of the woodwork to voice their opinions and views. Prior to Pri’s systematic demolition of the online multiplayer game, using a combination of Pigeonhole Principle, Van der Waerden's theorem (VdW), and other legal mathematical principles, Pri had already publicly disclosed for the first time in history just how Roulette can be beaten by non-mechanical means, and the fact that no proof exists to the contrary. So all this preceded the later controversy: the leader board was to come second and the cheating accusation came third.

So it was on this fateful day (September 16th) in 2015 that Priyanka first took the gambling world by storm after revealing his approach to how Roulette, including the house edge, can be overcome â€" with demonstrations of up to 9% edge in some dazzling videos showcasing Quad Cycles, posted via Youtube. Apparently, Pri has achieved up to 75% edge, which equates to 3.1 on the leader board. Since then somebody else claimed a new world record of 3.6/77-8% edge, yet his public record was only 1.1, so that claim is in doubt and Priyanka (hereafter: Pri) remains the current champion of the Roulette world.



The existence of Non-Probabilistic methods for conquering the casino had been alluded to back in 2013, but it was only a year ago that Pri was finally compelled to begin openly disclosing such concepts behind his secret core weapon of mass destruction - all the while remaining anonymous and under oath. We know that Pri values hard work, effort and dedication on the part of the Roulette student and would rather not reveal his concepts outright in a book for the lazy or greedy since they don’t deserve it. Students of Pri’s teachings should therefore be expected to sacrifice up to 6 years of their life to learn this â€" since the syllabus is so large and varied, requiring much practise to grasp the many concepts. Above all, I believe Pri values open-mindfulness, appreciation of patterns in nature, numerology and the universe.

This is my attempt to rejuvenate interest in this subject â€" but do take my descriptions with a pinch of salt â€" as I’m still many years away from having a complete accurate picture (all blunders/misunderstandings are entirely my own and do not necessarily represent Pri’s own views or those of his more accomplished students).

It all began with one of many statements similar to this: everything in Roulette is based on Random play â€" unless playing for something that we know definitely has to happen within a defined limit. In a nut-shell, this describes Non-Random â€" the foundation of Pri’s knowledge, wealth and status. How much control we have over the “defined” part I do not yet know. One of the first exercises Pri advocates is dozen triplets to understand conception:

Triplet 1: 123 = 3 dozens in 3 spins (or Unique 3)
Triplet 2: 232 = 2 dozens in 3 spins (or U2)
Triplet 3: 111 = 1 dozen in 3 spins (or U1)

Above we have a sequence of 3 combinatorial events: outer dozen triplet sequence inner U3-inner U2-inner U1 (forming outer U3). One of those has to repeat during the next outside event â€" the 4th and final (maximum) chance that this has to happen…

Triplet 4: 11..

Now there is only 1 dozen remaining to complete the non-random sequence, and already U3 has been *locked out* â€" it’s now impossible for U3 to repeat â€" but our final Schrödinger's cat result rests on the remaining dozen next spin:

Triplet 4: 112 = 2 dozens in 3 spins (U2)

U2 won! U2 now goes on to define the Non-Random sequence for the next cycle if choosing to play on. This is an application of Pigeonhole Principle (PHP). Combination U1 (1 dozen in 3 spins) is not as common as U3, which in turn is not as common as U2 â€" the king won over his peasants, possibly fulfilling the Birthday Paradox? In 4 dozen triplets we have to have a repeat of one of those 3 combinations, based on 27 individual sequences. The repeat could come as soon as two inner triplets completes. Each of those dozen triplets is an event, so the Non-Random limit here is 2 to 4. Combining this with stats we have an average of 3/U2.

Playing randomly is not the same thing. If you try to guess when, say, line 6 (31-36) is going to appear â€" it could take up to 80 spins to hit â€" but not exactly 80 spins; that’s just a rough guide for this limit since there is no fixed limit. Same goes for Straights/500 spins.

However, playing Non-Randomly, say, for a repeat of a dozen: this has a fixed limit neither of 5 nor 6 â€" but of 4 spins (comparable to 4 events for dozen triplets as 1 large event) â€" regardless of sample size. An extension of this Non-Random strategy might be tracking for 2 repeats where the 2nd repeat has to happen within the next 3 spins (providing all 3 had shown once before the 1st repeat occurred). Pri showed that tracking for more repeats results in tracking less dozens. Repeats are increasing and uniques are diminishing so eventually the stats have to prevail; an indication of this might be when simultaneous results line up within parallel games? Forming outer triplets also results in outcomes that are not equally likely and dependent: this being the key to further development surrounding Non-Random frameworks and greater predictability despite there being fixed unfair payout odds that are designed to break even (notwithstanding house edge).

Number Cycles were slow to be disclosed, but Pri went on to illustrate them eloquently. It was suggested above that dozen triplets (dozens in 3 spins) could be wrapped by uniques to form cycles of outer triplets for continued play of further Non-Random sequences, and to create a biased game at the same time. We could also use “high/low in 2 spins” to match “quads in 1 spin” in terms of two counterpart parallel PHP games that line up well, i.e. they are well matched. The more simplistic single dozen, quads, lines, streets, or even EC cycles in isolation, could be wrapped in a number of different ways based on their cycle length and defining element (2 different ways for the former) in terms of creating outer cycles and dependency. Instead of playing in parallel it has even been suggested that all these cycles could be used alternately as part of a parachute progression, which master Manrique had championed and was well known for, prior to his untimely passing in 2008.



Pri also introduced early on the concept of Van der Waerden (or VdW). In its simplest form, based on red/black, same/different, clockwise/counter-clockwise, cycle length 2/3 â€" 2 variables forming an arithmetic progression of 3 â€" VdW has a defined Non-Random limit of 9 spins (never 10 or 11, etc.)

Different Non-Random sequences/games can be played alternately or in parallel with constant ratios (= greater stability) compared to playing randomly where variance is the main dictator; A Cyclic framework â€" akin to autopilot for repeats isn’t necessary to achieve this stability â€" only the repeats themselves (or other events that have to happen within a fixed limit) focused in context of combinations primarily instead of sequences (secondary application possible?).

Here’s what happens when you combine 1 game of PHP Cycles @ 1 repeat (limit: 2 to 4) with 1 game of VdW @ 1 repeat (limit: 3 to 9):

Censored at the request of Pri’s student




Comprising several results per event at its core, I would have thought that VdW was superior to PHP as a Non-Random framework. In fact, VdW is only meant to be a guide acting as proof or support of PHP; it’s possible, apparently, to later remove VdW from the frame and then see how random behaves purely through repeats / dominance:

link:s://:.youtube.com/watch?v=vbTQx3zCkmM



Conclusion: we have Pri to thank exactly one year ago to this day for offering exposure to these powerful concepts with such amazing potential. Within that time I have seldom witnessed any other method worth talking about and only small pockets (no pun intended!) of intelligent discussion in general. I feel Pri’s contribution was underappreciated, and I hope we can begin picking up the pieces from an otherwise abysmal year. Elsewhere they have already begun experimenting with VdW thanks to Nick radiating Pri’s ideas into foreign territories. I’m hopeful that in the next year those clever roulette alchemists residing here can surpass others, first by moving beyond the disbelief/ridicule stage and then being the first to unlock their initial 1% of edge towards acceptance of reality and truth proven by Pri:

“There will come a day when you will be able to see past whats happening on the surface and free from the wheel, felt and the statistics that the pit bosses want you to keep your attention to.”
“Mathematically, there is only one way to beat the roulette and that is through seeing the game with a non-random lens. “

Please join me in celebrating 1 year of Random Thoughts â€" cheers!!!

[INTERCEPTOR]

Thanks Pri for shes great system, now all players can be long term winners, cool 

[donik7777]

Thank Priyanka for generosity!
Happy anniversary!

[MrJ]

Her stuff is no better than that goofy GUT....sorry guys.

Ken

[RouletteGhost]

The series of 3 dozen options really does make ya think

Even if it does not help. Makes ya think

(why GUT was brought up i do not know. Where I come from thats called "baiting"  *rolls eyes* #herewegoagain #calebsghost)

[MrJ]

Where I come from....I'm trying to *SAVE* you time/money. Dont waste your energy on crap ideas.

Ken

[bigmoney]

Well
I can't see why it won't work paitence is your friend

[nottophammer]

The best lesson learnt, is the one that hurts, from those mistakes a person learns.

It does not matter how long you go on with your lecturing on this dont work and believe me this is not the way, cough.

After all these years, what lets the members know you are any wiser.

[Drazen]

Dear members I apologize for my twisted point of view here, but who has right to resent me? We have so many other proves around working principles and methods in details from a few members and I think this is nothing but loss of our precious cheap time.

As I never actually dedicated much time to that thread I will say from what I have read.

I think Priyanka should mention she is giving it straight away in full details for everyone to have it and use it. Every lazy ass should be able to just open web browser without even need for registering here and have a formula to beat the game. All that she gave and the way she tried to explain some ideas was so offensive from her! Who cant agree with me? I know many of you will agree with me so that why I decided to say it publicly.

Priynaka is just a cheater who started to write this thread way after the game was running and any proof she gave cant be plausible in any way. Those who have allegedly find and proven some truth in the principles (like Nick and Falklor) should be banned immediately for spreading conspiracy.

I wish you all the best

Drazen

[Tomla021]

Drazen as far as I know Priyanka started talking and leading people to look at something way before the game was started.
cheers

[Priyanka]

wish you all the best

I enjoyed reading that post. I notice with your time in Ireland, you have learnt a lot about a different form of conversation.

[falkor2k15]

I've witnessed some edge with PHP and VdW - the part that's censored above - but I haven't yet gone out to make my millions because I'm still in training and interested to learn more about Pri's elegant techniques and principles that tell us more about the nature of the cosmos. Besides, VdW is a little tricky to play in live casinos - but could be mastered with practice.

I haven't yet witnessed edge using VdW by itself - but I'm sure it's possible.

Today I witnessed edge with just PHP cycles alone. I was only a few cat's cradle moves away from discovering it myself, but the 2 additional steps needed to begin caging the animal was a bit beyond my intelligence, imagination, pattern recognition skills, initiative - call it what you will - to match what Pri's posse has achieved. In hindsight it wasn't anything technical - but could only have been thought up by a genius. I think Pri is beyond the best magicians in the business; his magic school can see many patterns and connections that are invisible to the majority. My pattern recognition skills are 2nd to none - but I have to admit my abilities are inferior to those of Pri. It's not every day I meet a group of people more smarter than me - so it's interesting to learn where the limits of my intellect lay. But it's not something I can improve on, either - you either have it or you don't; Pri is level 10, some of his students are up to level 9, and I'm about a level 7. I accept the facts of life and reality...

So Pri's theories are indeed sound; I've seen enough evidence to confirm them as conspiracy fact.

[Drazen]

I enjoyed reading that post. I notice with your time in Ireland, you have learnt a lot about a different form of conversation.

Thanks Pri. I am glad my progress is noticeable and luckily different form of conversation is not the only form I got chance to improve. Will I succeed to my predetermined level is something what I have to push for a bit more.

But the thing is that as it seems I am learning about different view to the game too, solitary forum roulette life attracts me more and more... If I ever get a chance to go to the monastery for good I ll bring the answer with me.

Number of my posts diluted lately and one of the reasons is that I dont like anymore saving any ones time on open roulette forum, but rather find a way to spend my time for others in different form. I think it can be more useful for them.

I am happy to see you still step in from time to time here.

So to all members who are celebrating this anniversary I wish best of success in the future!

Cheers

[Turner]

I have been critical to GG for his approach being deceptive with respect to name changing and hinting.

This has often been to his face in PM, but I have to say that he has helped me look at roulette in a different way (indirectly) and am grateful for that.

"Theres nowt queerer than folk" and I include myself in that.

Allegations of cheating and misleading are, at best, a distraction when it comes to making a decision as to whether the information or lessons received are useful or not.

That goes for motives and intentions too

At the end of the day, these are writings on roulette methods that you can take onboard or reject.

The witch hunt is a side issue.

Cast the first stone I say

[praline]

Priyanka is a GreatGrampa`s daughter.

Also, those who are interested can read my short notes on concepts that I keep for every system I play, the kind of data I gather for every session that I have played. My daughter has kindly wrote me a datawarehouse database where this all resides and uses cubes to get me reports when I need Very insightful. Am learning it too!

June 24, 2013, 03:13:58 pm