Easy way to make profit

[mogul397]

it was a long time ago, mogul

I did not lose any money i do not believe...... i had a stop loss, but it went south

i have no problem admitting then when i was a newbie i played martingale

it was on baccarat....after 3 B or P in a row i bet the other side....

after a bad run i never looked back

you know, at my local casino the organic baccart machine often has B runs of over 12.....I see people cash in big

I am a believer in play as you wish...learn lessons your own way....as long as it is disposable money and will not hurt you, do what you will

if i lose, i will still be going out to dinner friday night

I understand.  But I see a few things.
Your paradigm of play was a "no loss" paradigm.  So the "going south" just
meant that it violated that one rule.

Also, it's funny. Not that it has to matter. But I was looking at
roulette with the "doubles" scenario and playing a 5 step marty
for a REPEAT. Opposite of the traditional.

I once watched, real wheel, real play, two women chase a marty.
Black was repeating and they were chasing red. I was all over it.
Routing for them, and watching reality unfold feeling great shock.
But the truth almost seems to be that the scenario always quoted
is the one where the run continues and someone bets against it.

Just pointing out some details.

[mogul397]

So just to point out (if it is true). That you let
go of your hope based on one loss.

Not exactly a characteristic expectation.

[mogul397]

Sorry for the type mistake.

The sequence is RBRRBB without stopping, even if Zero comes… Continue with that sequence and double your bet if loss until you win. Even if you win continue with your sequence.

Till now, i reach incredible results.
I know that martingale is very dangerous thats why I'm asking your help to test before they cut my legs.

Now my BR in 1127u (initially was 200u).
On my last session  max. exposure has been 31u.
I also tried it with a D'alembert and looks very powerful.
Obviously we need to test more.

Omar

Aside of anything else I said, 1127 units is crazy.

I play at a $5 table. A 5 step labby is only 32 units.

[RouletteGhost]

Didn't really let go of hopes

I just ended up knowing better

A marty after a streak of 4 will lose....

Might win for awhile

And i guess if luck is on your side for a long time

Most baccarat players i see win by riding streaks

[RouletteGhost]

Aside of anything else I said, 1127 units is crazy.

I play at a $5 table. A 5 step labby is only 32 units.

I know you fancy zumma

See how long a 6, 7, or even 8 step marty wins betting RBRRBB. Reset to 1 unit on a win

I bet it finds a devestating loss within 4 pages

[ozon]

Hi
I'm not Marty fan, but the sequence which plays RBRRBB is certainly better like chasing sleepers, more action, the probability same.
Stop lose 64 units, 32 units profit target .

Same system as most on this forum.

[ozon]

Haha, yesterday played this strategy for fun, using the minimum bets in WillHill, before the moment I logs in there and they ban  my  possibility of playing live casino.

[Steve]

the moment I logs in there and they ban  my  possibility of playing live casino

That's because:

1. They know live roulette is vulnerable
2. You did something that just might be related to advantage play

William Hill do this to lots of accounts for live roulette. It never happens with RNG, because they dont lose with RNG except when the player gets lucky.

[ozon]

I have more and more problems with online casinos,
I have very good strategy for Rng, but I trust almost only betvoyager, after winning a few% of bankroll, they began to disconnect me .
Playtech casinos is riged to the max.I dont trust them.Dublin bet Disconnect me.
I do not know where I can play.

[RouletteGhost]

Be wary of celtic casino

I play with fun money and sometimes it freezes or disconnects

Better off live casino or airball in casino shop....

[Tamino]

Even better chose a CLASS III casino if available .

[mogul397]

I know you fancy zumma

See how long a 6, 7, or even 8 step marty wins betting RBRRBB. Reset to 1 unit on a win

I bet it finds a devestating loss within 4 pages

Probably true. It's also sadly true that while sifting through pages of actual data I will
grab zumma occasionally as a comparison.

I was going to make this added comment to my other comments.
If you were going to try to figure an unlikely event, you would string
results together, figuring that the longer the string, the less likely.

I honestly don't remember almost any strings of 5 wins in a row. But by
the same rules, strings of 5 losses seem to fall out of the sky.  There's something
backwards.

I have been thinking, in various directions, of making an up as you win method.
Not by conventional thinking. But by jumping on the wagon train that spits out
strings of 5 or whatever.

[RouletteGhost]

Hes hoping for 1 win by betting that sequence

[mogul397]

Hes hoping for 1 win by betting that sequence

I know that. I thought what you were saying was that in a small number
of pages you would find marty losses easily with that pattern.

And I was saying that, while it always seems easy to find 5 or 6 losses
in a row, I NEVER seem to find even 4-5 wins.

[BellagioOwner]

I have very good strategy for Rng

what system you play for RNG? Is it proftiable so far in your long run?