Double streeting twice!

[tuddilue]

If we lost on the bet 1,1,1,1,1 (1 on each of the 5 DS) then move on to 6 on each of the 5 DS.

How do you handle the 0 in the matrix?
I played it only flat bet and it recovers really good. So that can be the starting point before testing the progression. Because it recovers after 5 wins.
- Tuddilue

[RouletteGhost]

Definitely have a good feeling

The roulette wheel wont spit the same DS pattern out every 3 spins

Impossible

Win streaks could be huge

[Willie]

Yes the win streaks would be very long, but still got to respect the session win goal since we just have a 2 step progression which would definitely bust in long run or even in a short session.
Though yes the recovery would be equally quick

[Willie]

Your progression is wrong ..it's similar to a sytem I use except I put the ds streets in order with the dozens..ie I put it in a 3 wide dozen matrix in corresponding order ...dozen 1 in one group dozen 2 in next dozen 3 in next and write down ds streets underneath...3 results wide...when the trio forms on the beginning of that bet if there are 3 different streets in line above just bet the oppisite streets for two spins..bet amount corresponds to the street you bet on...5th street is 5 units 1st street is 1 unit 4th street is 4 units etc...just flat bet..for two spins then next trigger will form matrix style again ...for you people who want to progress it..ll be 1st bet on 3 ds streets 1 unit on a loss it's 3 units on 3 ds streets...no higher and take the loss and just repeat on next trigger...no going up in stakes just play as is

Quite confusing post I must say, on one hand saying my progression is wrong and then posting your altogether different method!

[Willie]

How do you handle the 0 in the matrix?
I played it only flat bet and it recovers really good. So that can be the starting point before testing the progression. Because it recovers after 5 wins.
- Tuddilue

Excellent point Tuddilue about the flat bet.. but as for zero we have to consider it a loss, so one can say it's better to play this on the euro version than American which has the dangerous duo

[Willie]

How do you handle the 0 in the matrix?
I played it only flat bet and it recovers really good. So that can be the starting point before testing the progression. Because it recovers after 5 wins.
- Tuddilue

I ran through rng for 75 spins, no session goal, no stop loss..

With flat bet:
66 wins + 66
9 loss -45
Total = +21

With 2 step progression
75 wins = +75
No losses

But let's imagine if we had one loss then +44
If two losses then +13

[RouletteGhost]

green= win
red= loss

lost flat betting

lots of 0s...a method like this id say insurance on 0...however we know at that point we would be called goofs...oh well

but i think it won with your progression idea, I did not do the math though

just wanted to post some real spin results

thanks

if you lose in that column only increase unit size in that column? good idea

[RouletteGhost]

0 is the only thing that made that hard ^

[Willie]

green= win
red= loss

lost flat betting

lots of 0s...a method like this id say insurance on 0...however we know at that point we would be called goofs...oh well

but i think it won with your progression idea, I did not do the math though

just wanted to post some real spin results

thanks

if you lose in that column only increase unit size in that column? good idea

RG, you would have lost just once with the progression and I calculated from your spins..

Wins = +69
Loss = -31
Net = +38

[RouletteGhost]

RG, you would have lost just once with the progression and I calculated from your spins..

Wins = +69
Loss = -31
Net = +38

Ok. I need to wrap my head around how your playing. Still slightly unsure

Thanks

Nice strategy

[Willie]

Sorry Tuddilue, RG..
I mentioned in replies to your post that we would be -31 on a loss whereas it would be -35 when both steps fail in the progression.. my bad

[tuddilue]

Sorry Tuddilue, RG..
I mentioned in replies to your post that we would be -31 on a loss whereas it would be -35 when both steps fail in the progression.. my bad

No problem. I was always thinking of 35. I have not even thought about that you wrote wrong...
- Tuddilue

[RouletteGhost]

0 is a loss or you cover?

[Willie]

No problem. I was always thinking of 35. I have not even thought about that you wrote wrong...
- Tuddilue

[Willie]

0 is a loss or you cover?

It's a loss only if it comes when you bet 6,6,6,6,6