Psychic roulette prediction testing

[Steve]

I hate to use the word psychic, but its a common way of describing whatever it is.

Anyway i went through some old files and found a copy of the majority vote method in gambling. I checked and I couldnt find a copy of it on the internet. I only have it in printed form. There a few parts to the tests, in all about 100 pages from 1970-1985. Either its a very elaborate hoax, or this is something real. The people involved appear to also have been involved in cia remote viewing experiments, or someone knew the right names to use in a very convincing elaborate hoax. Is it a hoax? With everything considered, I dont think so. I received the information from a friend about 15 years ago.

I have the source code for the software they used. Once the math is understood, I'll hire a coder to write the program in a modern programming language. Then we can test it. The results will be kept private for whoever participates. The idea is one person bets based on the predictions and the algorithm that processes the data. The edge claimed is between 15-40% for games with near EC. Big claim, and my previous testing was not far off, but not enough tests to have conclusions.

If you are interested and serious about participating, please let me know here.

[Nick-the-Greek]

Hi Steve,

If you need participants for this one please let me know - psychic/meditative roulette selection has always interested me.

I've experimented a few times by picking numbers online that just pop into my head, with mixed results so further work needed.

Also, I missed the cut off for your JAA software - any idea when this will be available again?

Thanks

Nick

[High Ideas]

Im interested on participating. Whats the minimum of people needed for the algorithm to have 15-40% edge, 50-100 people?

[Scarface]

I'll be interested in trying this out

[Steve]

Thanks, and actually as few as 5 participants were enough to significantly impact the player edge. That's because a bet was only justified when the software's algorithm determined a more likely accurate prediction.

I'll look more into the algorithm this week. It's written in a computer code from around 30 years ago.

[BellagioOwner]

So what exactly are we supposed to do to help you in the experiment? If there is something I can do sure, count me in for participants.

Regarding the JAA that was referred in the thread. Is anytime opening again? Good question.

English won't be a problem for any possible explanations as it is described on the website

[Steve]

When I'm ready to go with testing, I'll contact people from this thread.

I can still take jaa players if the player requirements are met. Another option is the hybrid roulette computer, which costs you nothing except equipment you buy from ebay or whatever supplier you choose. That's explained at :.roulettephysics.com/computer-service/ but its better you contact me directly about those. Methods like jaa and computers probably have a 5-10 years of practical use left. It's hard to say. Things havent really changed that much in the last 15 years so who knows. I've been saying for years that precognition is where its all heading. Really I think it's the new AP and just a matter of time.

[nowun]

Really good offer Steve, lots of potential.

I have a tendency to underperform under pressure doing what I do (videoing etc), so I will give this a miss.  Quite happy winning my way.

[Steve]

I have a tendency to underperform under pressure doing what I do (videoing etc)

Yes its the same for everyone. And this kind of thing is most affected by pressure. But the idea is the technique and algorithm better deal with errors. Anyway no problem, I'm sure you can still provide input in some way.

[Redherring]

I'd be happy to take part but in not a hardcore gambler like others seem to be 

[High Ideas]

I'd be happy to take part but in not a hardcore gambler like others seem to be 

I think we dont need to try it out with real money, so I dont think thats a problem haha
And steve if you want to share with us the code of your algorithm I would like to see it aswell to see how it works

[Blood Angel]

Hi Steve, sounds interesting. I would be happy to give it a go.

[777]

Hi Steve, Im interested to participate

777

[Steve]

For now at least Ill keep the source code private. It was given to me in confidence although long time ago.

What i intend to do is have an interface users can have either on a website or pc, then there is an analysis server that generates final predictions to send the players.

[High Ideas]

For now at least Ill keep the source code private. It was given to me in confidence although long time ago.

What i intend to do is have an interface users can have either on a website or pc, then there is an analysis server that generates final predictions to send the players.

Well, if you need some help looking on the source code/maths you can always PM me hahaha