Card Counting at Baccarat

[ozon]

link:s://:.youtube.com/watch?v=kO0Jf5tdITQ



As an additional bonus, I discovered the JSTAT Count with the side counting (and the lack of) of 8/9's remaining in the shoe with minus counts works very well with Player Bets in conventional mini/midi baccarat. A deck particularly poor of 8's/9's and ten value cards diminish the power of the third card rule favoring the Banker side. Because any 8 or 9 and ten card value as third card determine many times the standing Banker action where the Banker takes the most of its advantage. Moreover whenever a deck is poor of 8's,9's and 10's frequently, it means that more small-medium cards are available to catch for Player side as third card. Obviously the (slight) main effect favoring the Player side is due to the second issue, along with the fact the Player bets are paid 1.1 and not 0.95:1


I find  this on another  forum , Its  is  possible  to  generete a edge?

[RouletteGhost]

When i was in Atlantic City playing EZ baccarat i think this cat was card counting for the dragon side bet

He won many times he bet on it

Stacks of chips

I followed him and won big

[ozon]

Chasing the dragon bonus with card counting certainly is effective.
I wonder if the claim of the counting in the standard baccarat is real and whether we have advantage plaing Player.
I'll try for a few days to count and see what comes out.

  Here is the entire text of the description of the film




Counting cards at baccarat and blackjack with the multipurpose JSTAT Count. A winning card counting strategy/tutorial on how to beat the casinos. EZ Baccarat's Dragon 7 side bet is also revealed.

Casino/Advantage Play consultant Eliot Jacobson did a a card counting analysis of the EZ Baccarat Dragon 7 side bet that was published on the Wizard of Odds site in 2011. Using a linear count simulation, Jacobson concluded a shoe depleted of more eights and/or nines than normal provided an advantage for the Dragon 7 side bet which pays 40-1. I upped the ante by including the JSTAT Count (2-9=+1 and 10-K=-2) with a side counting of 8/9's and have been very successful playing in casinos. It only makes sense that a winning three card banker 7 cannot happen with a ten card (on plus JSTAT Counts) along with the 8/9's as a third card in this non-linear count.

As an additional bonus, I discovered the JSTAT Count with the side counting (and the lack of) of 8/9's remaining in the shoe with minus counts works very well with Player Bets in conventional mini/midi baccarat. A deck particularly poor of 8's/9's and ten value cards diminish the power of the third card rule favoring the Banker side. Because any 8 or 9 and ten card value as third card determine many times the standing Banker action where the Banker takes the most of its advantage. Moreover whenever a deck is poor of 8's,9's and 10's frequently, it means that more small-medium cards are available to catch for Player side as third card. Obviously the (slight) main effect favoring the Player side is due to the second issue, along with the fact the Player bets are paid 1.1 and not 0.95:1

If used correctly, Las Vegas Strip/Atlantic City/Macau/Indian and other casinos will face a winning strategy which gamblers brings home winnings from the greedy casino gambling industry.

Side counting the 8/9's are just as effective in blackjack as it is in the EZ Baccarat Dragon 7 side bet or conventional baccarat. At blackjack, on plus JSTAT Counts with more 8/9's remaining than normal, our double downs will approve on 10/11 and the dealer will bust more often than average. In my opinion, the side counting of 8/9's with the JSTAT Count enhances card counting at blackjack and baccarat to the point of long-term wins.

[ozon]

Today I played 8 games, only in one  the conditions were appropriate. I make 3 units,  maybe we have edge, but it is very delicate. Calculations of the author, definitely should make about 1 unit from 20 decisions after trigger. Statistically, this is probably an average of 1-2 units a day.
If we have a lot of time and a large bankroll, it can be a good solution.