Something that shows promise

[Joma]

Hello All!

I have been lurking around this form for the past couple of years soaking up ideas.  You guys are certainly creative I will say that.  Some really great concepts flying around here.  I am looking to have something tested over 10,000 spins if that is possible.  I am in the process of testing based off of the WizardOfOdds 1 million spins.  Ok here it goes.

Bet Selection:  Static Bet

(6) Quad or Corner Bets

2,3,5,6
7,8,10,11
14,15,17,18
19,20,22,23
26,27,29,30
32,33,35,36

1 unit on each of those locations.  If I win I stay at 1 unit.  If I lose at 1 unit, I increase each bet 1 unit. 

spin1...loss
spin2...2 units on each...loss
spin 3...3 units on each....win?

I keep it at 3 until I get back to my last high bankroll level.

Each loss I increase by 1 unit.

It is early on but through 202 spins I am +262 units. 

The base  bet is 6 units to profit 3...or a 2to1 bet.



Any testing help would be greatly appreciated.  Let's keep pushing.

Joe

[Steve]

Looks like a simple +1 after loss, -1 after win progression. You'll find it is much the same with any other bet when the odds/payout are much the same.

One of my favorite mess around systems is the same but betting colors. It doesn't work long term though. Just a reasonably low risk short term strategy.

[Joma]

Well that is the thing.  It isn't -1 after a win.  I stay at the current level on a win, unless I am back to even.  Also, I posted my idea here because I was looking to get it tested.  I am aware of what the system is.  Thanks though.

Joe

[RouletteGhost]

I once tested 6 quad bets see my thread American quads it did very well flatbet for a while but a tank from time to time so be careful

Maybe different results your way. But i can tell you had many sessions good flat bet and many bad

[Joma]

RG,

I am a fan of wheel coverage.  After all, the more pockets that you cover, the more chances you have of striking.  I have been testing with excellent results.  Of course, every strategy has a pitfall.  I really hope that somebody can get this tested.  I am curious to see how it does over a larger amount of spins. 

Joe

[RouletteGhost]

RG,

I am a fan of wheel coverage

Joe

Me to

I base a lot of systems i create off that

[Taotie]

It is early on but through 202 spins I am +262 units. 

Oh, dear.

You could continue your own testing by purchasing roulette extreme, then importing actuals from random.org and manually ploughing through 1000's of spins.

Or learn how to code it yourself then run vast simulations through suitable software.

[Taotie]

RG,

I am a fan of wheel coverage. 

This is sloppy wheel coverage.

[Joma]

So what amount of spins makes a system "legit" ?

[payitforward]

Hey Roulette Ghost. I was following your thread about betting double streets where you said to bet against the 5th back street appearing. Forgive my ignorance but it sounds like you are betting the other 5 double streets (which I must be wrong.) Doesn't make since to me with only a 5-1 payout. Sorry for posting this in the wrong thread but that thread to which I am referring appears to have been closed, and I didn't see a way to PM you. Would you be so kind as to correct my interpretation of how you were/are betting this in detail. I'm a little slow sometime lol. Thanks much.

[Joma]

Oh, dear.

You could continue your own testing by purchasing roulette extreme, then importing actuals from random.org and manually ploughing through 1000's of spins.

Or learn how to code it yourself then run vast simulations through suitable software.

That is the whole point of posting my strat in this section.  Because people here have those resources already.  This is a roulette community.

Also...please explain why you think this is "sloppy coverage"

[Joma]

Regardless of where the wheel is covered...I still have 24 chances to win...and 14 chances to lose.  I rather do that than cover 4 or 5 numbers and hope to hit.  Not my cup of tea.

[DoctorSudoku]

Regardless of where the wheel is covered...I still have 24 chances to win...and 14 chances to lose.  I rather do that than cover 4 or 5 numbers and hope to hit.  Not my cup of tea.

So once you reach the 3 unit level, you flat bet 3 units on each quad until you recover? Is that correct -- sort of like the Hermes leveller?

[RouletteGhost]

Ah the hermes leveler

Memories

to OP

American Wheel Test

LLWWWWLWLWWLWLWLLWWWWWLWWWLLWWWWWWWLLWWWWW

13 LOSSES - 312 UNITS    (13X24)
28 WINS    - 336 UNITS    (28X12)

I BET YOUR QUADS BUT INDIVIDUAL NUMBERS FOR EASY MATH

FLAT BET     +24 UNITS

[DoctorSudoku]

Rich,
I have never really tested the Hermes leveller with real money bets. Have you had any positive experience with it?