Something that shows promise

[RouletteGhost]

Sorry bellagio i wasnt targeting you. I was speaking in general

[mogul397]

Hello All!

I have been lurking around this form for the past couple of years soaking up ideas.  You guys are certainly creative I will say that.  Some really great concepts flying around here.  I am looking to have something tested over 10,000 spins if that is possible.  I am in the process of testing based off of the WizardOfOdds 1 million spins.  Ok here it goes.

Bet Selection:  Static Bet

(6) Quad or Corner Bets

2,3,5,6
7,8,10,11
14,15,17,18
19,20,22,23
26,27,29,30
32,33,35,36

1 unit on each of those locations.  If I win I stay at 1 unit.  If I lose at 1 unit, I increase each bet 1 unit. 

spin1...loss
spin2...2 units on each...loss
spin 3...3 units on each....win?

I keep it at 3 until I get back to my last high bankroll level.

Each loss I increase by 1 unit.

It is early on but through 202 spins I am +262 units. 

The base  bet is 6 units to profit 3...or a 2to1 bet.



Any testing help would be greatly appreciated.  Let's keep pushing.

Joe

It's an interesting thing. It looks like a MM paradigm that could work for evens.

It's almost like you tried to become creative with selection and MM. I have
tried to think of ways to cap a D'alenbert or the like. And sit and stew while
the results ran until it came back, thereby not running up a high progression.

I'll test this.

[BellagioOwner]

Since we are talking about 2 to 1 bets I have an approach about double dozens that looks solid. I have been in profit with it with less than 66.6% win percentage. (19 /32 win spins =59% win percentage in 2 to 1 bets ) and positive balance on this hard session with only 17 units drawdown.

You bet 2 dozens 1u. On win you are +1 and over. Start again at 1 u. On a loss, add 1u to both dozens. Continue adding +1u on all next spins(Won or Lost) until you are in profit BY 1 UNIT.
That means that if you are -3u for new bankroll high and your next bet is let's say 7u on each dozen, you will drop it to 4u each dozen. No need to be greedy. This greatly reduce bet sizes and drawdowns. It's fun system. Feel free to use/test it and tell me if you liek it or not 

[mogul397]

Hello All!

I have been lurking around this form for the past couple of years soaking up ideas.  You guys are certainly creative I will say that.  Some really great concepts flying around here.  I am looking to have something tested over 10,000 spins if that is possible.  I am in the process of testing based off of the WizardOfOdds 1 million spins.  Ok here it goes.

Bet Selection:  Static Bet

(6) Quad or Corner Bets

2,3,5,6
7,8,10,11
14,15,17,18
19,20,22,23
26,27,29,30
32,33,35,36

1 unit on each of those locations.  If I win I stay at 1 unit.  If I lose at 1 unit, I increase each bet 1 unit. 

spin1...loss
spin2...2 units on each...loss
spin 3...3 units on each....win?

I keep it at 3 until I get back to my last high bankroll level.

Each loss I increase by 1 unit.

It is early on but through 202 spins I am +262 units. 

The base  bet is 6 units to profit 3...or a 2to1 bet.



Any testing help would be greatly appreciated.  Let's keep pushing.

Joe

Help me with the math. You win 2 units or 4 units or 6 units and you lose
6 or 12 or 18 units?  Seems like a tough grind, but I haven't dug in.

[mogul397]

Since we are talking about 2 to 1 bets I have an approach about double dozens that looks solid. I have been in profit with it with less than 66.6% win percentage. (19 /32 win spins =59% win percentage in 2 to 1 bets ) and positive balance on this hard session with only 17 units drawdown.

You bet 2 dozens 1u. On win you are +1 and over. Start again at 1 u. On a loss, add 1u to both dozens. Continue adding +1u on all next spins(Won or Lost) until you are in profit BY 1 UNIT.
That means that if you are -3u for new bankroll high and your next bet is let's say 7u on each dozen, you will drop it to 4u each dozen. No need to be greedy. This greatly reduce bet sizes and drawdowns. It's fun system. Feel free to use/test it and tell me if you liek it or not 

Do you have a stop loss or anything?

[RouletteGhost]

*Testing Update*

441 Consecutive Random Spins

+509 Units
1u=$1

....Testing Continues....

update?

[mogul397]

I just did zumma page 171. 30 spins
Came out +7.

There was a double zero occurance. I played like if zero appears,
wait till a number and then continue, to stay out of that.

1st wallpaper test OK.

[mogul397]

RG,

start at 1 unit...loss...
2units...loss...
3units...loss...
4units...win...
4units...loss...
5units...win...
5units...loss...
6units...win...
6units...win...
6units...win...etc

I stay at the current level until I get back to the high balance I had when I lost at 1unit.

It is more aggressive than a +1/-1

I thought you went to 3 units and stopped?

There are too many random reports of this method and unsupported
support.  What's really happening? With this or the leveler progression?

Too much like armchair discussion.

[RouletteGhost]

Its pretty simple

On a loss +1. He stays at that level until recovered....

[mogul397]

Its pretty simple

On a loss +1. He stays at that level until recovered....

Actually the original method says to go to 3 units. Not just +1.
Then reply #15 by him here has him continuing ad infinitum,
With +1.

Then you have this thread.
link:://:.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=15367.0
Which has it's share of interesting bantor.

[mogul397]

I'm wondering if this MM method has merit on it's own.

[bleep24]

 I played one session   I know that one is nowhere enough but this shows what can happen.

Soon after starting I had 6 losses in a row (minus 90 units)   I stayed on 3 units. All I recovered was 9 units playing on for about 60 spins.  A net loss of 81 units.

I much prefer the single dozen system posted on the forum recently.  Do not tweak it!!!   play as is.  I am having a load of success with it and if you want to be a bit more cautious use a sensible stop loss   (I do not think that enough emphasis is put on stop loss with most of the systems on here - it is as important and should be an integral part of MM as long as it is a sensible one to that system.)

Bleep24

[mogul397]

I played one session   I know that one is nowhere enough but this shows what can happen.

Soon after starting I had 6 losses in a row (minus 90 units)   I stayed on 3 units. All I recovered was 9 units playing on for about 60 spins.  A net loss of 81 units.

I much prefer the single dozen system posted on the forum recently.  Do not tweak it!!!   play as is.  I am having a load of success with it and if you want to be a bit more cautious use a sensible stop loss   (I do not think that enough emphasis is put on stop loss with most of the systems on here - it is as important and should be an integral part of MM as long as it is a sensible one to that system.)

Bleep24

Which single doz system?

[bleep24]

Hi Mogul397,
Nice to see that you are still alive and kicking.

I was referring Unique Dozen posted by Willie in Notepad (endish September)

I know that a dozen can snooze or sleep for a while but I have not seen it happen (perhaps because I only play Live/European)

The way I play this is keep playing until missing dozen comes up.  It can get to 10 misses but that is no great shakes as it generally recovers.
Progression 1 1   2 2   3 3   4 4   5 5 etc. so even if you have 10 misses (not very often) it is only 30 units and you are only moving up 1 step on a loss and down 3 steps on a win.
BTW:  I am still playing NLE and it is still working for me despite the naysayers.
Good luck,       Brian

[DoctorSudoku]

Brian,
Do you wait for the missing dozen to  miss a certain number of spins before you start betting?

In other words, is there a trigger that you wait for before entering the fray?