EC Predicter

[Ross]

Ok... Program downloaded and 200 sample spins from random. org  loaded.

Can you help a little explaining some staff on the UI?  What are the numbers next to Red, Black, High etc? They surely don't sum up to 195 as the total spins. Why there is 195 in purple box next to them? Just a counter?

And what about "Find next bets" Do we have various betting suggestions on these 195 spins file loaded?

Can't we add (at least for now) manual spins by clicking on the numbers. Looks like clicing them is not doing anything. At least in my version.

Looks fun software though. Thanks for posting it

The numbers next to R,B etc. is the number of numbers on which
you could bet "straight up" although they don't show in this
test version.

The number in the purple box is the number of spins loaded (or is it
processed).  This is a work in progress!

The full version has a keypad so that you can input numbers
as they come up.  As I stated this "Tester" is designed to show
that it works and that the predictions are accurate.

It works just as well without knowing the coming numbers
because the "Tester" doesn't use them to calculate bets
but only "looks forward" in the spins after the bets are
calculated to show how far ahead the predictions will hit.

The "Find Next Bets" gives the next "prediction" by advancing
one spin at a time through the loaded spin file.  If you were
betting on a prediction you could check that the EC you're
betting on is still predicted as a good bet.  So in the full
version it's imperative to input each new number as you
bet.  Rarely happens that a previous prediction goes "off"
before your bet hits - but this is roulette and you're not
supposed to win.

Hope this helps.

[Ross]

Betting on ECs with the usual progression 1,2,4,8,16 etc
can, even with EC Predicter, sometimes (at a guess about
once in 25 spins) lead to the prospect of a large bet.

I deal with by the simple expedient of spreading the next
bet, say on Red, of 32 units among the other suggested
bets.

So if Red, Low and Odd were suggested instead of adding
32 units to Red I would add ten to Low and Odd and 12 to
Red.

Has anyone tried this?  Seems to work on the limited
trial I've given it.

[Azim]

Here guy's  read this and judge for yourself:

link:://:.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=14618.msg123682#msg123682

[Herby]

  As I stated this "Tester" is designed to show
that it works and that the predictions are accurate.

Maybe my fault, untill now I can't see that the predictions are accurate.
Greets

[Ross]

Maybe my fault, untill now I can't see that the predictions are accurate.
Greets

I've heard of "dim" but this beats them all.
What's the point of this post?
Same old "Herby" from VLS?

[Herby]

There's no reason to get aggressive.

No, I'm not the other Herb.

Your software is able to load text files and then write some "prognostics".
This is children level. 

[Ross]

There's no reason to get aggressive.

No, I'm not the other Herb.

Your software is able to load text files and then write some "prognostics".
This is children level. 

OK Herby, let's see your programme for predicting ECs.

[Ross]

Here guy's  read this and judge for yourself:

link:://:.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=14618.msg123682#msg123682

Azim

Not sure what the reason is for this post.
but if you're suggesting that if we have a
recommendation that Red,Low and Odd are likely
bets then we could play straight up on numbers
that qualify.

I've tried it and it work a treat.  Nothing better than
betting on four or five numbers with a progression
which gives a modest profit - in my case ten units
on a win, pressing the "Auto" button and counting.
The bank goes down slowly but the payout is big.

I recall doing this with my old SpinMaster programme
with some success but my method then was less
sophisicated than it is now.

Hope this helps.