• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

Almost every system has been tested many times before. Start by learning what we already know doesn't work, and why.

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

Unique Columns

Started by RouletteGhost, Oct 27, 08:41 PM 2016

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

RouletteGhost



Thanks Willie for you dozen way...

I took the first 3 pages of zumma, about 125 spins....just to see how far the gaps were between the uniques

to see if columns were different then dozens

ONLY BETTING WHEN PREVIOUS 2 WERE UNIQUE

parentheses show where we hit a unique

Little bored tonight

Results: MAX LOSS in a row was 12, happened once. other then that the average was about 3 or 4 losses in a row after a trigger before a win. not bad for a 12 number bet

if a 12 in a row loss happens one time every 125 spins (which i do not think it does, further testing will determine) then a progression can combat that, 12 numbers is not a bad prog

L = column 1
M = column 2
R = column 3

L
R
L          BET-LOSE
(M)       BET-WIN
M         BET-LOSE
R         NB
(L)        BET-WIN
R        BET-LOSE
R         BET-LOSE
R       NB
R         NB
R       NB
R        NB
R       NB
M      NB
R         BET-LOSE
(L)      BET-WIN
R          BET-LOSE
(M)      BET-WIN
M       BET-LOSE
M         NB
L         NB
L        BET-LOSE
M       NB
(R)         BET-WIN
R         BET-LOSE
R         NB
L           NB
(M)         BET-WIN
M         BET-LOSE
R            NB
(L)        BET-WIN
(M)       BET-WIN
(R)       BET-WIN
0        BET-LOSE
L        NB
M        NB
M      BET-LOSE
M          NB
M         NB
R           NB
(L)         BET-WIN
(M)       BET-WIN
M        BET-LOSE
L           NB
(R)        BET-WIN
R          BET-LOSE
L           NB
(M)         BET-WIN
M           BET-LOSE
R          NB
M           BET-LOSE
M         BET-LOSE
M          NB
M           NB
R         NB
R           BET-LOSE
R          NB
M        NB
(L)         BET-WIN
0          BET-LOSE
L           NB
R           NB
R           BET-LOSE
R          NB
M          NB
R         BET-LOSE
M         BET-LOSE
M        BET-LOSE
L           NB
L               BET-LOSE
L            NB
M            NB
L            BET-LOSE
L           BET-LOSE
R           NB
L              BET-LOSE
0            BET-LOSE
R             NB
L             NB
R           BET-LOSE
L            BET-LOSE
(M)        BET-WIN
(R)        BET-WIN
M         BET-LOSE
(L)        BET-WIN
(R)      BET-WIN
L           BET-LOSE
(M)         BET-WIN
M         BET-LOSE
L               NB
(R)          BET-WIN
L           BET-LOSE
L          BET-LOSE
L              NB
R              NB
L             BET-LOSE
L            BET-LOSE
L               NB
R             NB
R             BET-LOSE
R            NB
L              NB
(M)           BET-WIN
L              BET-LOSE
L               BET-LOSE
L                NB
0               NB
M              NB
M            NB
L                 NB
M                 BET-LOSE
0               BET-LOSE
L               NB
R                   NB
(M)                BET-WIN
R                   BET-LOSE
M                  BET-LOSE
0                     BET-LOSE
M                    NB
R                      NB
R                      BET-LOSE
R                           NB
M                              NB
(L)                    BET-WIN
the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

RouletteGhost

outcome: I like this
the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

Steve

Hey RG, I saw ken is attacking you too. Perhaps remind him not long ago he confided in me he wasn't doing well with roulette and wanted to buy a roulette computer. Meanwhile to everyone he acted like "top dogg" with his killer "method". In fact from what I know, he seems to have a gambling problem. Like I said before, he attacks people's strategies, but has nothing himself. He wants you to die so badly in a car crash (his own words). Now that's a guy with problems.
"The only way to beat roulette is by increasing the accuracy of predictions"
Roulettephysics.com ← Professional roulette tips
Roulette-computers.com ← Hidden electronics that predicts the winning number
Roulettephysics.com/roulette-strategy ← Why most systems lose

DoctorSudoku

Quote from: RouletteGhost on Oct 27, 08:49 PM 2016
outcome: I like this

Yes, I agree. Looks promising -- thanks for posting this.
What is the fastest way of destroying your bankroll at the casino?

Play roulette with GLC's progressions.

nottophammer

Hi Rich
The 12 numbers are a static bet, (3 columns of static #'s) now 125 spins is short data set, but good enough to see if you could Hit and run as some like to call it.

Now would 12 random #'s behave any differently to 12 static #'s ?

Like your data set is tiny, so is the average document for Jackpot247.com, 300 games of watching how the non-hit, hit over, if possible 60 spins or more, i do not have control on the spins as its shown on TV, as the shows are of varying lengths, but of 293 recorded games, betting for the remaining 12 unique, non-hit, (0x), it has a max of 16 spins.

So is 16 L's going to show in the static 12 #'s ?
How do you win at roulette, simple, make the right decision

RouletteGhost

Quote from: Steve on Oct 27, 10:24 PM 2016
Hey RG, I saw ken is attacking you too. Perhaps remind him not long ago he confided in me he wasn't doing well with roulette and wanted to buy a roulette computer. Meanwhile to everyone he acted like "top dogg" with his killer "method". In fact from what I know, he seems to have a gambling problem. Like I said before, he attacks people's strategies, but has nothing himself. He wants you to die so badly in a car crash (his own words). Now that's a guy with problems.

What he is doing there now is for his own self gratification. Sigh.
the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

RouletteGhost

Quote from: DoctorSudoku on Oct 28, 12:22 AM 2016
Yes, I agree. Looks promising -- thanks for posting this.

Thanks

I will work on tweaking it

Proper (dirty word) - triggers
the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

RouletteGhost

Quote from: nottophammer on Oct 28, 12:35 AM 2016
Hi Rich
The 12 numbers are a static bet, (3 columns of static #'s) now 125 spins is short data set, but good enough to see if you could Hit and run as some like to call it.

Now would 12 random #'s behave any differently to 12 static #'s ?

Like your data set is tiny, so is the average document for Jackpot247.com, 300 games of watching how the non-hit, hit over, if possible 60 spins or more, i do not have control on the spins as its shown on TV, as the shows are of varying lengths, but of 293 recorded games, betting for the remaining 12 unique, non-hit, (0x), it has a max of 16 spins.

So is 16 L's going to show in the static 12 #'s ?

Hmmmm. This is not static. Only when previous 2 are unique

12 numbers in my opinion will behave differently then a doz or col on the layout depending on wheel layout

On the american wheel the columns are layed out in chunks they behave different
the key to winning with systems : play for a statistically irrelevant number of spins

link:[url="s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o"]s://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nmJKY59NX8o[/url]

nottophammer

I know its not static i was just trying to show how 12 random against 12 static  could go. You already had  12, when will or if go 16?

Its like Grandpaa way betting 9 #'s on the mat, it is a static 9 and ive seen 9 on the mat misss for 34 spins where as betting for the last 9 non-hit only take 23 to date.

Its like that old dozen bet posted by a programmer when 1 of the doz's miss in 5 spins now bet for that doz to hit, again any 12 on the mat, doz/col has you in a set position on the wheel, me i'd rather get to the last 12 of the 37 non-hit and then go for that.

out of that 300 games on J247, betting to the 12th spin for the remaining 12 non-hit has won 292 out of 294 games, just betting 6 times has won 89.45% of the 294 games, just an obseravtion, good luck 
How do you win at roulette, simple, make the right decision

-