Public testing of my roulette computers

[Steve]

THIS THREAD IS TO ORGANIZE THE PUBLIC TESTING OF MY ROULETTE COMPUTERS. BASICALLY ONE OR MORE FORUM MEMBERS WILL RECEIVE MY ROULETTE COMPUTER FREE TO TEST, AND REPORT THEIR FINDINGS.

Background information: Roulette computers are electronic devices that predict where the ball will land. My primary interest with roulette computers is use with my private teams. This is where players pay $0.00 to receive my best roulette computer, and pay only with winnings. Details are at :.roulettephysics.com/computer-service/. However, I also sell some of the technology so naturally the effectiveness of the devices are questioned. To refute nonsense about my computers, or my systems, anyone can:

1. Get a FREE trial roulette computer to test at home: link:://:.roulette-computers.com/free-trial/

2. See a demonstration of my roulette computer on any wheel you want: link:://:.roulettephysics.com/demonstrations/

3. Get my best roulette computer for FREE, and pay with winnings: link:://:.roulettephysics.com/computer-service/

4. Test my roulette system for 5-days for just $1: link:://:.roulettephysics.com/free-trial/

5. Review the public and independent test results: link:://:.genuinewinnerroulettesystem.com/#ronjo

6. See recordings of public demonstrations I conducted: link:://:.genuinewinnerroulettesystem.com/#publicdemos and below:

If you're relatively new to the gambling forums, you may not know I already sent a free computer to a well known and respected forum member for testing. He found my claims were true, and it resolved the matter for most people. Now I intend to conduct further testing with another well known and respected forum member.

The first step is to determine WHO will do the testing. And anyone who's interested in the testing can gave input on who should test.


THE IDEAL TESTER:

* Well known and trusted by the majority of people on forums to be independent and unbiased. There's no point otherwise. They don't need to be from this forum, or even on forums at all. The point is they are someone everyone knows and trusts.

* Must WANT to do the testing, and have TIME to test. I don't want to spend time assisting the tester when they can't be bothered, or don't have time.

* Reasonable experience in advantage play techniques: a background in visual ballistics or computers is best, so testing takes less time, and they understand what they're doing.

* Preferably has their own current model Huxley or Cammegh wheel: the tester doesn't need their own wheel, but it will make testing easier. Alternatively, testing can be done on recordings of real wheels (from either online or land-based casinos)

* Trustworthy and neutral: if I'm going to give someone access to an $80,000 roulette computer, they should be trustworthy. I don't want someone who is in constant conflict with forum members, because they may have unpredictable motives. I also want the tester to be reasonable and do sufficient testing. For example, they should select an average wheel, not deliberately the most difficult wheel possible.


THE TESTING THAT WILL BE DONE:

There are many tests that could be done, but perhaps the most comprehensive will be for the tester to select several different wheels to test on. The wheels should be either a Mk7 Huxley, or Cammegh traditional wheel because they are the two most common wheels in service today. The tests will be done in common conditions.

Proper testing requires approximately 140 spins per wheel (for one direction), so we can test two independent segments of 70 spins. This is basically to verify the peaks are in the same location.

My claim is that an edge of +5% to 130% is achieved on around 90% of wheels. The average edge is around 30% when predictions are about 15 seconds before the ball falls. There are countless variables that determine the edge, and it's not possible to know until you test.

Putting it into perspective, the normal edge against players is -2.7% for European roulette, and it earns casinos billions. The MIT blackjack card counters had about  a +2% edge, and they earned millions. So even a +5% is is substantial. But accurate calculation of the edge requires 140 or more spins. Simply the more spins there are, the more accurate the assessment is.

I'm open to any other reasonable testing, providing it doesn't require the disclosure of secrets.


COMMENTS FROM PREVIOUS TESTER:

Below are some of the previous tester's comments after testing:

Steves claims are correct about the Diamond hits and I had predictions within a three pocket arc several times and within a six pocket arc as well,and hits more than 50% on one half of the wheel. I did not have a direct hit on one number, but I had a hit on the next pocket to the predicted number three times in fifteen plays,in my opinion that is close enough. So to recap in fifteen spins I had a three pocket arc hit three times, a seven pocket arc hit five times the rest were losses or they were out of the three and seven pocket range but in half the wheel. This pattern kept on repeating in my testing.

Steves explanation is correct on my testing. The different diamond test was done and is correct and that the prediction was within a three pocket arc, the first spin and several others as the sample spin gets updated and deals with errors, as below as per quote that there were no predictions as the tolerance got tighter which is better than getting a poor prediction. I tested the whole DVD and as the sample was updated I got the same results. I was very impressed with the accuracy of the predictions, where I got predictions in a three pocket arc and a seven pocket arc and over 50% of half the wheel within the three pocket arc.

facts are facts and some people find it a problem to accept them.

everything Steve says in his explanation is correct.you guys need to read his post carefully as it must be kept in mind that we only focused on one particular diamond and we are getting a 1 in 5 hit rate and it was not only the fifteen spins that has been mentioned, this pattern repeated over the 100 spins and was consistent.

everyone, Steve is no scammer and has contributed a lot on RR a few years back and helped me a lot.

I do not want to get involved with discussing Steve’s methods and it is very simple to answer your question above, even if you had the spins there is nothing you can do to prove anything, as you are going on hearsay and not on personal experience with Steve’s material, and a possibility of incorrect application of certain methods by so called users of Steve’s material. I can assure you that what I tested was legit, and keep in mind that I was testing on one particular diamond for  testing purposes, I could have tested any other diamond but we tested only one,and the test was not to test predicted numbers but only a diamond,and sorry to say the test was accurate.

And to cap it all, Steve put me in contact with one of his players here in my country and we met up and discussed the computer and he was getting very good results. I can not let out what we discussed, but I can tell you that you would have to be very serious about playing this way and if applied correctly with timing in placing your bets you would do very well, that's all I can tell you

So unless you have had first hand experience I think it would be wise and best to stay out of the politics concerning Steve’s computer. So guys let’s let the man get on with his business,and unless you have the computer let’s get on with this challenge. Jackal check this out my testing is there read it carefully.

I just wish people would get their facts first before attacking people, just like in the case with Steve, a number of people have asked me for the spins Steve supplied me,but I have done what Steve asked and I am not going to say anymore about the testing as that has been finalized already, I have been insulted by being called stupid. As I have said I have met up with one of Steve’s players and he is not this imaginary player we have created, he is for real, and we have results from real casino plays and  discussed the computer in length and I am satisfied if applied properly we have a good edge against the casinos and that is final.

[AANDA88]

Can someone please get Steve to contact me ASAP!

[Steve]

Hows it goin? its better to email me