Two Twins

[tuddilue]

Let me rephrase that. Of course I get it. But I do not understand why your examples differs so much when I run them.
Maybe I do something wrong?
Can you have a look on my example here above...
- Tuddilue

[Willie]

3
3
3
1 W
1
1
1
2 L? (But its a win?)
1
1
3 W
2
0
3
3
3
3
2 L? (But its a win?)
3
3
1 W
3
2
2
3 W
1
3
3
3
1 W
1
1
0 L
3
3
0 L
3
3
3
0 W? (But its a loss?)
1
3
3
2
1
3
1
1
0
1

Hi Tuddilue,

I am afraid to say that you did get it wrong.
Here is the spin wise play:

3
3
3
1 W (Bet against 3)- Here we considered 3,3 to be one dozen type and then the next 3 to be a new dozen type so placed the bet that 4th spin won't repeat the new dozen type
1
1
1 L (Bet against 1)- Same logic as above
2
1 W (Bet against 2)- This would be simpler to undersand, after 1,1,2 we bet that it won't become 1,1,2,2 so we bet against 2
1
3
2 W (Bet against 2)
0
3
3
3
3 L (Bet against 3)
2
3 W (Bet against 2)
3
1
3 W (Bet against 1)
2
2
3
1 W (Bet against 3)
3
3
3
1 W (Bet against 3)
1
1
0 L (Bet against 1)
3
3
0
3
3
3
0 L (Bet against 3)
1
3
3
2
1 W (Bet against 2)
3
1
1
0
1

Hope this helps
Also not more than 2 losses in a row!

[tuddilue]

There is more than I thought in the beginning.
Thanks Willie!
- Tuddilue