NLE mk2

[bleep24]

NLE is still ok but because of the Brexit and US presidential election I decided that those events were the catalyst for NLE mk2 (only joking)

This could/will/possibly/maybe of interest particularly to Mogul who liked NLE but could not fathom out staking/progression.

For those that never  saw it or have forgot what NLE is all about:  it is waiting for 2 of the same EC becoming 3. (   I love rocket science)

Well mk2 is waiting for 3 of the same EC to become 4 (Heavens above!)  There are less 3`s to become 4`s so it is easier to track and work out stakes because there are not as many multiple opportunities to cause confusion.

Some may wish to play each EC separately but I play them all together to avoid multiple 3`s of the same EC occuring  possibly causing a long losing run.

Best of luck,
Brian                               

[nottophammer]

Fine tuned it now bleep?

[bleep24]

Hi,

I play same staking as mk1:      +1/-1          Bet any of the 6 E/C`s jointly:   ie:  not separately. 

Good luck,
Brian

[mogul397]

You know, there doesn't seem to be much happening here. But of late at least I seem to
have achieved some notoriety as having my own thread
link:://:.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=18232.msg168423;topicseen#msg168423
"just for mogul".
or honorable (??) mention in other threads.

I'm kind of a topic by myself. (Or at least my opinions are memorable).  Kind of like
the advice colum in the paper.

I think it's an hysterical post you made. Interesting that you're thinking outside your own box.

Here's a request. Which has been consistently made before.

Would you be willing to catalogue a session, record it in DETAIL and post it here?
Yes it is some work. But I am asking if you would do it. Showing the spin results and the
math involved in your bets?

And I already know that this could turn into a "bad example", where by accident the example
is exceedingly easy or something and doesn't reflect the work that might be needed.

It would clarify the whole mess and get us on the same page.

Thanks

"the mogul".

[mogul397]

WE would start with

1) bet unit size.
2) Buy in.
3) Show session.
4) end with max drawdown. Max bet.  And profit/loss.

[nottophammer]

these just played on multi player watching trot +44
21
13
31
10
3
21
8
22
14
35
8
16
15
12
16
10
16
13
17
30
10
22
16
5
14
0
4
9
3
35
8
18
17
23
9
2
19
34
9
31
28
2
24
0
13
8
31
12
7
14
32
10
35
35
30
35
31
17
27
31
pretty fast on there, think theres 28 of the 37 hit
Perhaps the latest celebrity on here could show the workings, 397

[nottophammer]

Bleep any good

[nottophammer]

little mistake not +1/-1 and spin 44, but would be plus. Good bleep

[nottophammer]

quick 40 spins on MPR +274 watching the trot,only 21 in 40 spins, big bets on last few as countback showed slow.
Heres the numbers
23
4
7
30
11
3
33
13
7
29
27
31
3
21
22
33
30
23
19
3
12
19
27
6
23
31
35
33
3
19
3
10
33
33
13
17
23
17
1
32
maybe run them tomorrow or the celebrity could

[mogul397]

these just played on multi player watching trot +44
21
13
31
10
3
21
8
22
14
35
8
16
15
12
16
10
16
13
17
30
10
22
16
5
14
0
4
9
3
35
8
18
17
23
9
2
19
34
9
31
28
2
24
0
13
8
31
12
7
14
32
10
35
35
30
35
31
17
27
31
pretty fast on there, think theres 28 of the 37 hit
Perhaps the latest celebrity on here could show the workings, 397

What is multi player?
What is trot?
And then what did you do?


No body knows what you're talking about.

[nottophammer]

What Ray is asking about in GUT, 0x's.
Are you going to show Bleep you know how to play NLE and show the workings

[mogul397]

What Ray is asking about in GUT, 0x's.
Are you going to show Bleep you know how to play NLE and show the workings

No, I won't show that. Cause I don't know how. How can or would I show something
that I don't know?

That is why I keep asking him. I'd like to see the math of how a session would work out.
And in particular where he cuts off (or doesn't cut off) when he's left in the middle somewhere
of the D'alenbert. Like he's betting 5 or 6 units, fought to get enough units back to get even,
and decides to stop the session even, left cast adrift in a bedpan.

And then taking it to my next level, wondering if he might care enough to actually do the work
at least once, or if he's just too F#$% lazy.

I do think he's from England, or something.  Writes like he is. Remember. The English invented the
"tooth brush".  So they could brush the single tooth they have left.  So maybe that complacency
effects all parts of life.

Sorry. You brought up that awkward example.

[mogul397]

I think what I was more wondering about was the part where, betting 2 dozen,
A progression of +/- 1 was used for the doubles.

[mogul397]

My inclination is still that the results of any of these methods tend to cluster.
My testing shows it.

So if I am looking at dozens.  2 or 3. Then two tends to become 3 in a group.
And betting 2-1, for one dozen is a lot easier on the bank and the nerves than
the double.

[nottophammer]

I think what I was more wondering about was the part where, betting 2 dozen,
A progression of +/- 1 was used for the doubles.

In dont knockit till you try it, reply 31 theres a nice set of spins showing the doz and the double dozen to bet, all with parley. Is that what you are talking of