NLE mk2

[Tekunda]

And what about playing the intermittencies?
This is another 'chance' which could be included.
Also,  if you like, please read up again on the way the Genesis system handles a long series of a certain chance.  After winning (when a 3 turns to four) and then let the series run its course without betting again on that series, the Genesis way bets again immediately with one unit hoping that the 4 will turn into a 5 of the same and if won bets again for 6 to become 7 (and you keep on betting) until eventually the series breaks.
So what do you think guys about handling a long series within a certain EC the Genesis way?
Could it give us an advantage to play this way instead of betting e. g. on a series of eight reds just one single time (and instead of betting again right away on that particular opportunity) wait for the next qualifier?

[Priyanka]

Which casino group was that Pri, if it's Aspers group you was lucky

being lucky is part of the game right.

It is hippodrome

[MoneyT101]

I can vouch for this method.  I made a spreadsheet last year with this one and nle.  Nick helped me make it.  It does really good in backtesting.

Having a set amount of spins also helps and/or having a cut off(units won or loss)

Very good system overall.

[shazwad]

Hi Bleep, with the +1 /-1 when you get to a new high and say you are betting 3 units, would you reset to 1 unit or continue? Would you take into account the W/ L ratio?

[bleep24]

Hi Shazwad,

Yes 9 times out of 10 I would reset.  It is better no matter which system/method/progression to be betting lowest possible units in case there is a losing run lurking around the corner. 

You do not have time to think about W/L and which EC you think is going to come next.  Go with the flow.

Good luck,
Brian
BTW.  I have mentioned that I now mainly play 3 same to become 4 as it is easier to track than 2 same to become 3.  With 3 to 4 there are usually less qualifiers,  so if it is slow going I throw in a couple of 2 to 3 to liven things up a bit but still only have one bankroll.   

[shazwad]

Thanks Bleep. I don't have an issue with the number of qualifiers playing 3 to become 4. I'm playing William Hill live wheels and they come pretty often.  Sometimes I will stay with whatever unit value I'm on (even if on a new high) if I've had more losers than winners. If the other way round I would reset knowing some losers are now expected - being a 50/50 bet.

[bleep24]

Hi Shazwad,

Good strategy.  I also play on Wm. Hill `live`

Brian

[shazwad]

Hi Bleep,
So far I have managed to double my 100 quid bank. if I get two triggers I bet them both . For example if I am on 3 units progression I would put 3 units on the two triggers, total stake 6 units. A lot of the time this breaks even so I would now go aggressive and my next bet would be 4 units. If I lost both at 3 units my next bet would be 6 ( I was on 3 units, then the two bets that lost are effectively  4 unit and 5 unit bets).
This is all very interesting, I think because of the progression we are using. I'm very interested to see how this pans out.
How long have you playing this 3 to become 4?

[nottophammer]

Bleep have you tried this on multi player, which we are to believe are recorded live spins, if can win on there, then you have a good method

[maestro]

nothing strange...in 30 spins probability to get run of 4 on EC is 60%

[DoctorSudoku]

.
Also,  if you like, please read up again on the way the Genesis system handles a long series of a certain chance.  After winning (when a 3 turns to four) and then let the series run its course without betting again on that series, the Genesis way bets again immediately with one unit hoping that the 4 will turn into a 5 of the same and if won bets again for 6 to become 7 (and you keep on betting) until eventually the series breaks.
So what do you think guys about handling a long series within a certain EC the Genesis way?

Tekunda,
I do NOT think the Genesis system says that we should keep betting until the series breaks.

I read the Genesis system line by line that you posted here on page 3 of this thread:

link:s://:.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=18237.msg173827#msg173827

The author of the Genesis system clearly says:

The aim is win 1 chip (or if we don't win 1 chip, then to break-even) on each betting series. So our first bet is 1 chip. If this bet wins, we have made our target of 1 chip profit and that betting series is complete.

I think you misread or misunderstood the Genesis system regarding when to stop betting on a series.

[Tekunda]

Tekunda,
I do NOT think the Genesis system says that we should keep betting until the series breaks.

I read the Genesis system line by line that you posted here on page 3 of this thread:

link:s://:.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=18237.msg173827#msg173827

The author of the Genesis system clearly says:

The aim is win 1 chip (or if we don't win 1 chip, then to break-even) on each betting series. So our first bet is 1 chip. If this bet wins, we have made our target of 1 chip profit and that betting series is complete.

I think you misread or misunderstood the Genesis system regarding when to stop betting on a series.

But you have overlooked to read the very next sentence which clearly states what I have tried to explain:
'A new series of betting starts on the very next spin, 1 chip again and following whatever the current results are doing - so if the colours are alternating and our last win came on BLACK, then the first bet of this new series is a 1 chip bet on RED'.

[bleep24]

Hi Notto,
No, I have not tried NLE on multi=player.   Keeping track/betting is hard enough to start with.

Hi Shazwad,
Been playing NLE 1 seems like about 18 months.   NLE 2 seems like about 3/4 months.  Time flies when you are having fun!!!!
Yes I also play different stakes.  I have mentioned a rolling amount.  I did not post much about this as I get enough questions without complicating instructions as it is, especially if it is betting more than one qualifier at same time.

Yes, I am still playing NLE though I do flirt with other systems/methods as well.   At present I am into EC matrixes.

Good luck,       Brian

[tuddilue]

EC matrixes

EC matrixes sounds interesting. Does you have some interesting links?
- Tuddilue

[bleep24]

Hi Tuddilue,

No, just same old, same old.   Profit Trickler on this forum very recently pretty much covered it so I have just used the best bits from that.

Brian