Devils Lines

[Thunder Pants]

Thunder Pants
I've used a longer line in the past 6 line in fact.
1-2-3-5-8
To be honest unless you change the MM it'd really no different.

The way the two groups are split means even if one particular dozen or high/low is dominant your chances of winning do not change, I'll keep testing as is at the moment will the moment come when it fails? Probably but until then let's keep it going

Ah yes. I did wonder if there was a particular reason for choosing the lines in those set patterns. Always wondered if there is anything to gain from staying clear of the predetermined EC bets. Aka why dosnt the wheel have a simple Red & Black half, but instead is spread out in the pattern it is today. Not thinking of the potential cheat way of cause as having half a wheel being 1 colour would mean it would be much easier for people to predetermin ball exit both as a player or as a "dirty" dealer. What im think of is if it adds variation to the game, aka you often hear player say "aww did you see how it hit my number first but in the last second spun into the next number". That probably wouldnt happen if the wheel was simply parted in 2 halves. Thus is there a point in choosing your own "half" manually of the wheel as in this strategy we play against the same happening again. As the wheel is now the ball can hit any area of the wheel & get 20 Black in a row followed by 15 Red, because black & Red is all over the place, but if you choose your own half of the wheel i cant recall the dealer at my local wheel hitting the same half for 20 times in a row ever. Not saying it cant happen though. Anyways, your selection of lines make a lot of sense too & clearly works. And thankfully does take into account the quite scary sleeping/cold line/dozen too.

"death pattern": aka AAA, BBB, AAA, BBB or ABB, BAA, ABB, BAA etc. Probably will turn up in longterm play so its worth looking out for. That you havnt run into one yet is a good sign though. Of cause its hard to tell too and even if you run into a AAA, BBB who knows if skipping a bet would doom you instead of saving you instead.

[Roulettedevil]

You could always wait for two/three lines
I.e

A A B
A A B
A
For instance then play ,all my testing as been aggressive,so maybe a bit more conservative play would be advisable.

[Roulettedevil]

Dragonara Casino 
Europe/Malta time (04:00 - 07:30)

Changed this from 3 line to 5 line
I think will produce better results
This session +90

0
17
28
3. 
20
31.     A A A B B

23
18
34
21.
31.    B A B B B. +3

8
36.
36
23
35.   B B B B B. +3

28
36
25.   
28
15.     A B A A A +3

9. 
27
19
24.   
2.       B A B B A +3

23
24.   
9
31
8.     B B B B B +3

20
2
8
7
7.      B A B B A +3

29
0
31
34
14
9.     A B B A B +3

0
14
12
4
31.  Z A B A B.  +3

5
17
33
32
24.     A A B B B

31
27
9
14
19.   B A B A A. +3

25
22
31
21
20.   A B B B B  +3

33
21
12
26
5.   B B B A A +3

7
30
1
16
11. B A A A B +3

20
24
7
8
6.   B B B B A +3

34
12
18
3
14.   B B A A A.  Ev

1
33
33
32
16   A B B B A. +3

15
3
28
10
26.    A A A B A +3

34
2
1
32
28   B A A B A +3

18
17
8
29
34.  A A B A B +3

36
15
5
8
33.    B A A B B.  +3

1
15
24
36
9.    A A B B B +3

16
36
26
7
12.   A B A B B. +3

34
1
32
16
36.    B A B A B +3

22
18
29
5
32.   B A A A B  EV

11
6
10
18
10.  B A B A B  EV

8
25
14
4
31.  B A A A B  EV

10
22
34
9
36. B B B B B +3

35
17
3
36
13.  B A A B A +3

5
0
20
29
15
0
23.    A B A A B   +3

30
17
2
10
13.   A A A B A  +3

10
0
30
12
4
2.    B A B A A +3

8
12
2
11
9.    B B A B B +3

0
30
0
35
26
14.    Z A B A A. +3

32
33
9
27
18.  B B B A A

6
18
20
29
20.  A A B A B. +3

36
6
27
21
34.   B A A B B  +3

22
1
12
25

[Thunder Pants]

oh nice session. Using 5 numbers in every set does look to be much better than 3. A little crazy that it never went beyond the 3rd bet in every line though. Still, probably was just luck as sooner or later the "killer pattern" does happen. However with 5 in a set it really should be quite rare so that the many smaller wins should outnumber a full loss.

[tuddilue]

oh nice session. Using 5 numbers in every set does look to be much better than 3. A little crazy that it never went beyond the 3rd bet in every line though. Still, probably was just luck as sooner or later the "killer pattern" does happen. However with 5 in a set it really should be quite rare so that the many smaller wins should outnumber a full loss.

Totally agree with Thunder Pants.
One question that I got was. If you start using 5 why don't use 6 instead?
I mean you progression is up to 6 steps?
1-2-3-5-8-13
-Tuddilue

[Roulettedevil]

Totally agree with Thunder Pants.
One question that I got was. If you start using 5 why don't use 6 instead?
I mean you progression is up to 6 steps?
1-2-3-5-8-13
-Tuddilue

It wouldn't be a six step progression it would be 5     1-2-3-5-8
Not sure if I would use a recovery progression, probably keep at 8 ...-1 on win till in +

[tuddilue]

It wouldn't be a six step progression it would be 5     1-2-3-5-8
Not sure if I would use a recovery progression, probably keep at 8 ...-1 on win till in +

Yes maybe that is to high. I just saw your first post and then you have up to 6 steps.
But I totally agree that that can be to high to recover.
So 5 steps should be good.
But so far you have not reach there yet 
But you will 
- Tuddilue

[Roulettedevil]

Yes maybe that is to high. I just saw your first post and then you have up to 6 steps.
But I totally agree that that can be to high to recover.
So 5 steps should be good.
But so far you have not reach there yet 
But you will 
- Tuddilue

Yes but when I do I'll be so far in profit I won't notice   

[tuddilue]

Yes but when I do I'll be so far in profit I won't notice   

Hehe yes that is the plan. It always happens sometimes. But that doesn't matter if you already is in profit 
- Tuddilue

[blueman]

Betvoyager no zero - RNG 
Europe/Malta time (11:00 - 11:15)

5 line
After that shit last night (initially 8 times RB - the first 16 numbers) now this (the first 17 numbers)? Luckily today play money!!!

6
8
36 
13
9       A B B A B

31
16
36
29
27    B A B A A

8
16
35
30
17     B A B A A  (progression 1-2-3-5-8)
19
11
         B A            (progression 13- BINGO??)

F.cking Martingale is big  no, nooooo........... We need another progression?

[Roulettedevil]

RNG
WHY??
You will lose

[blueman]

I know, but......? The debate on this issue continues - fair or not? I do not know?  A betvoyager has also Fairness Control.

[Roulettedevil]

I know, but......? The debate on this issue continues - fair or not? I do not know?  A betvoyager has also Fairness Control.

if you must play bet voyager, see my post at

[url]link:://betselection.cc/even-chance-8/bv-0-01c-holy-grail//url]

or play 3 in a bed, i went from 24 euro to over 1200 euro before
nearly "losing the lot"

[bleep24]

Hi all,

I was playing Wm. Hill live last night.  I was playing a different system but I checked this one and it went to 4 steps then it lost 5 steps and 2 on next series before winning.      LLLW=          LLLLLLW===         so it can have a losing streak.  Do not know what prog. would overcome these streaks.

+1/-1 might work but it could be a long drag.

Bleep24

[blueman]

Roulettedevil -thanks, looks interesting and I will try, but this part of I (or play 3 in a bed, i went from 24 euro to over 1200 euro before
nearly "losing the lot")did not understand the best?