Precognition software instructions

[Steve]

I think that's rather subjective. Assuming precognition's legitimacy, success depends on the individual.

[Winner]

I had just arrived in Vegas down a few dollars just to excited to be there and wasn't really focused and got a bit  emotional ? So my sister that has no clue in the game blurts out hey I had a dream her dead father in law gave her some numbers she's says bet on 29 an I should of listened cause messages come in all forms and  I ignored it and 29 was the next hit number. So yes it does work but to get your self out of the way not so easy..

[RouletteGhost]

There is enough evidence to suggest precognition is more than fantasy

There are scientific studies on it that can be found on line

Freaky

[Steve]

to get your self out of the way not so easy..

Yes conscious thought is a big blocker. There are ways around it. For example, by measuring physiological responses. If I had time I'd create a device to analyze heart rhythm. It is more direct that fingertip sweat and heart rate, which are the typical methods.

And yes RG I believe there is enough evidence. At least has better potential than trying to make 1+1=4

[Winner]

There is enough evidence to suggest precognition is more than fantasy

There are scientific studies on it that can be found on line

Freaky

Remote viewing I have dabbled in this . Yes it does work but when you try to use for monetary purpose it will fail it's not meant for that.

[RouletteGhost]

Perhaps most central to the recent debate regarding the existence of precognition is work by Bem (2011). Bem (2011) time-reversed several classic psychology effects (e.g., studying after instead of before a test; being primed after, instead of before responding) and found evidence across nine experiments supporting precognition. Given the sound methodology and publication at a high-impact mainstream psychology journal, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,

[RouletteGhost]

link:://news.cornell.edu/stories/2010/12/study-looks-brains-ability-see-future

[Winner]

Yes conscious thought is a big blocker. There are ways around it. For example, by measuring physiological responses. If I had time I'd create a device to analyze heart rhythm. It is more direct that fingertip sweat and heart rate, which are the typical methods.

And yes RG I believe there is enough evidence. At least has better potential than trying to make 1+1=4
[/quote
There is no need do that  automatic writing is a simple method to distract your conscience mind  and this I have dabble with again not meant for monetary purpose.if you want to help find lost kids or homacide or communicate with dead people itwill work. Any ways this is a gambling forum .

[Steve]

Yes it does work but when you try to use for monetary purpose it will fail it's not meant for that.

It sounds like an excuse, but actually I found this is correct so far. I think basically because the emotion of money and greed is the opposite of the mindset required to achieve accuracy. They are polar opposites.

But if you can remove the emotional attachment, and conscious thought, and make it all about whatever you feel is right (without emotions of money and greed), then perhaps you can change the odds enough.

[Winner]

It sounds like an excuse, but actually I found this is correct so far. I think basically because the emotion of money and greed is the opposite of the mindset required to achieve accuracy. They are polar opposites.

But if you can remove the emotional attachment, and conscious thought, and make it all about whatever you feel is right (without emotions of money and greed), then perhaps you can change the odds enough.

Perhaps

[Steve]

Yes your article is a good one. I have a whole research paper with detailed results but its not mine to publish. There's more than enough to pursue research.

ARTICLE CONTENT:

Study showing that humans have some psychic powers caps Daryl Bem's career
By George Lowery  |  December 6, 2010

Bem
It took eight years and nine experiments with more 1,000 participants, but the results offer evidence that humans have some ability to anticipate the future.

"Of the various forms of ESP or psi, as we call it, precognition has always most intrigued me because it's the most magical," said Daryl Bem, professor of psychology emeritus, whose study will be published in the American Psychological Association's Journal of Personality and Social Psychology sometime next year.

"It most violates our notion of how the physical world works. The phenomena of modern quantum physics are just as mind-boggling, but they are so technical that most non-physicists don't know about them," said Bem, who studied physics before becoming a psychologist.

Publishing on this topic has gladdened the hearts of psi researchers but stumped doubting social psychologists, who cannot fault Bem's mainstream and widely accepted methodology. Bem became interested in the scientific study of psi (unexplained processes of information or energy transfer) when he was asked to find methodological flaws in one psi researcher's successful extrasensory perception studies -- and couldn't.

"The research and this article are specifically targeted to my fellow social psychologists," Bem said. "I designed the experiments to be persuasive, simple and transparent enough to encourage them to try replicating these experiments for themselves." Bem's innovation in the experiments reported in the article was to "take well-known phenomena in psychology and reverse their time course."

Rather than present a stimulus and measure a subject's response, Bem measured the subject's response before the stimulus was presented. In some earlier experiments by other psi researchers, participants were hooked up to physiological measuring equipment similar to a lie detector that measured emotional arousal. They sat before a computer and watched randomly selected images; some were erotic or very negative ("like the bloody photos you see on CSI") images.

"Your physiology jumps when you see one of those pictures after watching a series of landscapes or neutral pictures," Bem said. "But the remarkable finding is that your physiology jumps before the provocative picture actually appears on the screen -- even before the computer decides which picture to show you. What it shows is that your physiology can anticipate an upcoming event even though your conscious self might not."

Bem's nine experiments demonstrated similar unconscious influences from future events. For example, in one experiment, participants saw a list of words and were then given a test in which they tried to retype as many of the words as they could remember. Next, a computer randomly selected some of the words from the list and gave the participants practice exercises on them. When their earlier memory test results were checked, it was found that they had remembered more of the words they were to practice later than words they were not going to practice. In other words, the practice exercises had reached back in time to help them on the earlier test.

All but one of the nine experiments confirmed the hypothesis that psi exists. The odds against the combined results being due to chance or statistical flukes are about 74 billion to 1, according to Bem.

Throughout his career Bem has taken paths less traveled. In 1994 he co-authored a series of experiments on telepathy published in another APA journal, the Psychological Bulletin. "In my work, I have always pursued problems or puzzles that strike me as interesting and have not worried about how it might affect my career. I have a maverick approach to many psychological topics, and I consider myself fortunate that Cornell has always given me the freedom to do that."

Bem, who came to Cornell in 1978 and retired in 2007, said it is unusual for him to work on one topic for eight years, "but this one was a biggie and seemed like an appropriate thing to end my career with. The journal in which it will appear is the same journal that published my very first article 50 years ago."

Bem said he conducted the experiments because he believed that existing research strongly implied that precognition is real. "I went in optimistic that I would be able to find it with these experiments," he said. "After I started getting positive results, my undergraduate research team seemed puzzled by my enthusiasm and said, 'But didn't you tell us you thought these would work?'

"I said yes, but when I actually see them work, that's very different."

[Steve]

I mentioned a few times I have a research paper from a reputable group that studied the viability of precognition in gambling. Specifically it was to guess red/black with real roulette spins.

The entire document is very large and would take a while to scan it, so I took just a photo of some of the results:



The test was not statistically huge. One of the problems with testing precog it's it's impratical to get much data, because each trial takes time.

But with their "majority vote" algorithm and software to amplify accuracy, the results were clearly more accurate. It changed a small edge to a significant edge.

The same algorithm is coded into the Android software in the first post of this thread.

It's not conclusive proof of effectiveness. Rarely in this field is anything conclusive enough because of the issue explained above. But at least the results merit further trials and research.

[precogmiles]

I mentioned a few times I have a research paper from a reputable group that studied the viability of precognition in gambling. Specifically it was to guess red/black with real roulette spins.

The entire document is very large and would take a while to scan it, so I took just a photo of some of the results:



The test was not statistically huge. One of the problems with testing precog it's it's impratical to get much data, because each trial takes time.

But with their "majority vote" algorithm and software to amplify accuracy, the results were clearly more accurate. It changed a small edge to a significant edge.

The same algorithm is coded into the Android software in the first post of this thread.

It's not conclusive proof of effectiveness. Rarely in this field is anything conclusive enough because of the issue explained above. But at least the results merit further trials and research.

Wow that is really fascinating.  Any update on when we can try this software again? I would love to see new data using this method.

[Steve]

The difficulty is coordinating participants because of different timezones. I'll proppse some times soon.

Also last time we did such a test manually, it was positive but much more data is needed.

[precogmiles]

The difficulty is coordinating participants because of different timezones. I'll proppse some times soon.

Also last time we did such a test manually, it was positive but much more data is needed.

That's really positive news. I'm looking forward to it.