Turbogenius and gambler's fallacy

[TurboGenius]

Yes its a fallacy because the reality is just basic probability. Can you ever know which will repeat with better than random accuracy?

Yes, you can know. Because of a few simple facts (that I planned to get to in the other thread @turbo).

[RouletteGhost]

Yes, you can know. Because of a few simple facts (that I planned to get to in the other thread @turbo).

Let's do it

Snows coming

Got time to burn

By the way were You at Harrahs last weekend. Was I playing next to you?

[TurboGenius]

By the way were You at Harrahs last weekend. Was I playing next to you?

No !   lol
I'm easy to spot - I always sit as close to the wheel as possible.
(and I'm the best looking person in the casino - just saying)
I was going to hit Parx but plans didn't work out so it was postponed.

[cerces]

Personally, I use a very simple strategy that has served me well over the last few years.
Session length is restricted to 140 spins or 3 hours, whichever comes first.
I wager (straight-up) on a single/chip number per spin, randomly decided on  by a sequence indicator of my own rresearch and design.
To win, i have to hit more than 4 numbers per session, but usually average around 7 to 10,
No charting, no computers, no VB or DS required, only a healthy dose of discipline, with no alcohol and no distractions. Not perfect, but makes around 500-700 units per session, in a real, live table B&M casino with Euro wheel.
BTW, the use of a computer to win at roulette sounds highly unprovable.
A casino executive that I discussed this (hypothetical) scenario with, indicated and demonstrated that a player, openly "using" an electronic device could only win by random luck as ANY DATA collected during a spin could not be precise enough to be of any value in result predetermination.
So, Good Luck with that, because that is all that you can rely on.

[nottophammer]

Just go take a look in wiesbaden. ....
There you see on each day and table how many times the numbers got hit.
You will notice that in almost all sessions there are a few hotties going like fire.
Now with this info....

What would you do?
And if you happen to not get ahead in the rare occasions. .....what would you do the next session? 

Merry Christmas everyone. ...

Played these on Multi-player just now. I'm waiting to see if only hit twice in 1st 20 spins, so can bet for those showing twice to go three, after spin 20, never got a chance. Now been playing like this for about 10 days and its now getting hard to get the chance to bet, so is it watching like the FOBT's

[iar000]

Personally, I use a very simple strategy that has served me well over the last few years.
Session length is restricted to 140 spins or 3 hours, whichever comes first.
I wager (straight-up) on a single/chip number per spin, randomly decided on  by a sequence indicator of my own rresearch and design.
To win, i have to hit more than 4 numbers per session, but usually average around 7 to 10,
No charting, no computers, no VB or DS required, only a healthy dose of discipline, with no alcohol and no distractions. Not perfect, but makes around 500-700 units per session, in a real, live table B&M casino with Euro wheel.
BTW, the use of a computer to win at roulette sounds highly unprovable.
A casino executive that I discussed this (hypothetical) scenario with, indicated and demonstrated that a player, openly "using" an electronic device could only win by random luck as ANY DATA collected during a spin could not be precise enough to be of any value in result predetermination.
So, Good Luck with that, because that is all that you can rely on.

Can you tell us about your strategy

[nottophammer]

So when playing on Multi-player by your self was the above method known  or is steve really giving live spins?

Now here Maestro is playing, so if its dodgy, its now got two players to try and mess up.

If no number has gone to 3 hits by 20th spin, start to bet for one of those shown twice to go to a 3 hit

[nottophammer]

What the 40 spins look like

[nottophammer]

In those 40 spins,what chance would you give for winning on the 21st non-hit where you'd be betting 17#'s, took 6 spins, by coincidence the 20th took 6 spins,      Thats multi-player 

[nottophammer]

Never any good on multi-player when on there by yourself.
Waiting for 20 spin, then bet 2 hit to go 3 hit

[nottophammer]

[nottophammer]

[nottophammer]

[nottophammer]

Gave up. As said elsewhere been using this method now on MPR, is it recognising the wait as only me there.
Morts airball seems different, as does Jackpot