@ turbo

[jekhb76]

Not to worry, I'm done posting.
As I just said at the other forum, my casino results will speak volumes and then
excuses can be made as to how I somehow won.
The game has been beaten - I intend to display that with results and then enjoy the accomplishment.
There's no need to continue posting on the topic - others are working hard on it
I see and they'll do just fine as a few have paid attention to what I've posted.
The nonsense will also continue from others and I have no reason to be a part of it any further.
Cheers.

Well said.

[Steve]

[nottophammer]

But he plays at RS where the full session showing everything he does is recorded and can be replayed by the admin as a video

Now thats a decent sentence from you

[nottophammer]

Someone shoot me a email when such a place appears, thanks.

Be waste of an E-mail you don't reply

[nottophammer]

The nonsense will also continue from others

yes that idiot Sir anyone

[nottophammer]

Steve this is using progression suggested by Turbo, might not be 100% his way but look at the win rate, like he says if BR grows can use a more aggressive prog.
At start 1,5,25 to big, small start, look where it can get you.

Even RS the posted game is working the prog, perhaps some of those sheep could come back, not 2 thou, old sir anyone and DUH, might as well bury those two, how does DUH say "dickbrains",

[Madi]

Rare event got today.
74 spin didnt pass 3s. Not only once. Back to back two times. Fucked up totally. 

[nottophammer]

post the 74 spins more than one way to skin a cat

[Steve]

Rare event got today.
74 spin didnt pass 3s. Not only once. Back to back two times. f***** up totally. 

You can't rely on rare events because the proportion of times they happen to the amount risked means you still lose.

You can delay the inevitable with progression, but the vast majority of players still have the same result.

You cant try to Just win in your lifetime of spins because that approach leads to potential big loss. There might be 10 players who profit a combined $50,000 plus the one poor player that loses $55,000.

[Steve]

Also it seems RS has a minimum outside bet if $1 and maximum of $20,000.

How is that a simulation? A real casino would be stupid to have such broad table limits. It enables extended progressions that could lose them a lot, even if spins were totally random. This is another likely cause of RS having so many large winners. All a player needs to do is reset their rated games, and try again.

You can't do that with MPR. Why should be obvious. And the table limits are much more realistic.

RS has its place but RX is a much better option for testing. And for proving your system on a level field, MPR is more the simulation.

[Madi]

post the 74 spins more than one way to skin a cat
[/quote

When those r delivered means its finished. When u know those spin before u can win even playing red black. I was playing repeater but failed that time. I feel peace in mind when i lose flat bet. But progression always hurt me.

[Madi]

MPR is time cosuming. I can finish 37 spin in 7 mins in RS. I understand u tried to make it as real casino condition but for me its big time.

[wiggy]

perhaps some of those sheep could come back, not 2 thou, old sir anyone and DUH, might as well bury those two, how does DUH say "dickbrains",

This one doesn't need any help! 

[Steve]

Yes MPR is time consuming. And RS is time consuming too. Neither is a good option to test your system. RX is better if you code and test far more spins in seconds.

But before testing a system, test the working principle that changes the odds. If you dont change odds, you change nothing.

[nottophammer]

Hi wiggy
just finished on R-sim, Turbs says take 3000, win +3000



I could have got there quicker, but i miss counted the unit, thought i was on 20, but when the win come i was still below the previous high, realised i was on 10, but it played like a dream, suppose old sir anyone will now post a dreaming pic, what a cunt, sorry members but thats what he is