• Welcome to #1 Roulette Forum & Message Board | www.RouletteForum.cc.

News:

Almost every system has been tested many times before. Start by learning what we already know doesn't work, and why.

Main Menu
Popular pages:

Roulette System

The Roulette Systems That Really Work

Roulette Computers

Hidden Electronics That Predict Spins

Roulette Strategy

Why Roulette Betting Strategies Lose

Roulette System

The Honest Live Online Roulette Casinos

@ turbo

Started by Steve, Dec 29, 07:00 AM 2016

Previous topic - Next topic

praline and 80 Guests are viewing this topic.

6th-sense

Lots of hits there notty but if we ignore zero in the repeats there’s 10 repeating numbers there and from spin 37 to 40 we would have bet 4 times against ..won 3 lost one gives plus 4 ..
Wish every sheet was like this one
In reality an average of ten numbers bet against makes it
just under 3 to 1 flatbetting ...
Just using the 1st set of repeats any others through the game can be ignored
Now maths would dictate that these repeats would have to keep hitting in that ratio to lose with zero against you too

So in the rest of the 111 spins take away the 36 original spins that gives us 75 spins left of game
Would 23 of them be repeats on every session of any or a combination of the original repeats from 1st session?

If it was it would be a winning system all along

Not tested all your sheets as they are everywhere..you should just do a thread just to post everyone of them there

Question is do they contain more winning sheets than losing ones flatbetting

nottophammer

6TH
our tracker, you have got it i presume.
Just why you watch.



checkpoint shows spin 60; 31; 0x's what does Mort's avg give for spin 60, 


So 1 more 0x in 20 spins, if you have any data on 0x;29 you'd now be watching, 9; 0x's to bet at your decision.

Here is some data on 0x; 29. For the fun of it also 0x; 30


Now decision, you see the avg to hit and the known max, wait 4 spins? then bet, do you know how many bets you could cover, where i play 14 spins, so 4 +14= 18 spins, when did it last go to 17 spins?
How do you win at roulette, simple, make the right decision

The General

Quotethe accuracy of our predictions is when we play repeaters! As Long as you play the numbers that are performing above expectation you are on the Right track .

Jekh,

Why would a repeater be more likely to hit again than a number that has not hit at all in the random game??? ::)

Basic probability and The General are your friend.
(Now hiring minions, apply within.)

jekhb76

Quote from: The General on Apr 06, 05:07 AM 2018
Jekh,

Why would a repeater be more likely to hit again than a number that has not hit at all in the random game??? ::)
Hi,
Not it isn't. But i never said that.
Eddy.

maestro

QuoteWhy would a repeater be more likely to hit again than a number that has not hit at all in the random game???

why in random game in 37 spins there are not 37 uniques
Law of the sixth...<when you play roulette there will always be a moron tells you that you will lose to the house edge>

jekhb76

Quote from: maestro on Apr 06, 06:49 AM 2018
why in random game in 37 spins there are not 37 uniques
Also possible.
That i never seen this event happen, doesn't Mean it can't.
It can happen over a million years, it can happen next week, even tonight when i'm gonna play and try to reach my daily â,¬100 goal. We'll never know when it is goin' to happen, but possible? Yes.

The General

Quote from: maestro on Apr 06, 06:49 AM 2018
why in random game in 37 spins there are not 37 uniques

Basic probability predicts that some numbers will hit a few times and some won't hit at all.  In short there are a gazillion more ways for it not to hit all 37 numbers once in 37 spins. 
Basic probability and The General are your friend.
(Now hiring minions, apply within.)

jekhb76

Quote from: The General on Apr 06, 10:41 PM 2018
Basic probability predicts that some numbers will hit a few times and some won't hit at all.  In short there are a gazillion more ways for it not to hit all 37 numbers once in 37 spins.
Good morning,
But the difference is, that i don't stop at 37 spins! You need to See beyond that. If you can't then you'd be stuck in a vacuüm! :yawn:

The General

Quote from: jekhb76 on Apr 07, 12:57 AM 2018
Good morning,
But the difference is, that i don't stop at 37 spins! You need to See beyond that. If you can't then you'd be stuck in a vacuüm! :yawn:

No, I think long term. You're the looking at only the short term.  Long term you'll lose at the house edge.
Basic probability and The General are your friend.
(Now hiring minions, apply within.)

jekhb76

Are there things certain to happen in roulette? Yes there are.
Look at this.
On spin 38, i Will Have a number that turned to a 2. On spins 75, i Will Have a number that turned to 3. On spin 112, i Will Have a number that turned to 4. On spin 149, i Will Have a number, that turned to 5. Etc etc. Of this i'm certain. And that every number need to hit sometime and it will return.
As you can See, ramdom also has his limits of what it can do. So like Turbo said; ramdom beats ramdom. Now we only Have to know the Right math behind it, to take advantage of this event. 
Is there a way to beat the game? Yes i'm sure ! Do i Have the awnser? No i haven't. Do i provider it, when i knew it? No i won't! Because of many reasons .:thumbsup:

jekhb76

JUST BECAUSE YOU CAN'T OR DIDN'T SEE IT, DOESN'T MEAN IT DON'T EXIST!
Eddy - 2018

:lol:  :twisted:  :lol:  :twisted:  :lol:  :thumbsup:

The General

Quote from: jekhb76 on Apr 07, 01:05 AM 2018
Are there things certain to happen in roulette? Yes there are.
Look at this.
On spin 38, i Will Have a number that turned to a 2. On spins 75, i Will Have a number that turned to 3. On spin 112, i Will Have a number that turned to 4. On spin 149, i Will Have a number, that turned to 5. Etc etc. Of this i'm certain. And that every number need to hit sometime and it will return.
As you can See, ramdom also has his limits of what it can do. So like Turbo said; ramdom beats ramdom. Now we only Have to know the Right math behind it, to take advantage of this event. 
Is there a way to beat the game? Yes i'm sure ! Do i Have the awnser? No i haven't. Do i provider it, when i knew it? No i won't! Because of many reasons .:thumbsup:

Did you take a lesson in oxymorons from Turbo?

Random beats random?  Lol!!
Random has limits?

QuoteNow we only Have to know the Right math behind it

The math says that you guys are being foolish.

You guys have your heads stuck in the short term nonsense.  ::)
Basic probability and The General are your friend.
(Now hiring minions, apply within.)

Taotie

Quote from: The General on Apr 07, 03:46 AM 2018

You guys have your heads stuck in the short term nonsense.  ::)

Well that's a very polite way of putting it...lol

jekhb76

Quote from: The General on Apr 07, 03:46 AM 2018
Did you take a lesson in oxymorons from Turbo?

Random beats random?  Lol!!
Random has limits?

The math says that you guys are being foolish.

You guys have your heads stuck in the short term nonsense.  ::)
And you call yourself the General? You act More like a private  :yawn:
Well i rather be stuck with my head in short term winnings, then floating between endless spins.
And why do you be so disrespectful regarding other members? (OXYMORONS) If i were a moderator, i had you removed from this Forum at once. You don't reserve our Response. This is also the last one you get from me.
FIN

The General

Quote from: jekhb76 on Apr 07, 05:08 AM 2018
And you call yourself the General? You act More like a private  :yawn:
Well i rather be stuck with my head in short term winnings, then floating between endless spins.
And why do you be so disrespectful regarding other members? (OXYMORONS) If i were a moderator, i had you removed from this Forum at once. You don't reserve our Response. This is also the last one you get from me.

It's obvious that you don’t know the definition of an oxymoron.

An oxymoron (usual plural oxymorons, more rarely oxymora) is a rhetorical device that uses an ostensible self-contradiction to illustrate a rhetorical point or to reveal a paradox.[1][2] A more general meaning of "contradiction in terms" (not necessarily for rhetoric effect) is recorded by the OED for 1902.[3]

The term is first recorded as latinized Greek oxymōrum, in Maurus Servius Honoratus (c. AD 400);[4] it is derived from the Greek ὀξύÏ, oksús "sharp, keen, pointed"[5] and μωρόÏ, mōros "dull, stupid, foolish";[6] as it were, "sharp-dull", "keenly stupid", or "pointedly foolish".[7] The word oxymoron is autological, i.e. it is itself an example of an oxymoron. The Greek compound word ὀξύμωρον oksýmōron, which would correspond to the Latin formation, does not seem to appear in any known Ancient Greek works prior to the formation of the Latin term.[8]-wiki

More examples...

Prediciting random
Random has limits
Random beats random ::)


Basic probability and The General are your friend.
(Now hiring minions, apply within.)

-