@ turbo

[Anastasius]

Regrding that is someone able actually tell me the probability or odds of having twenty numbers in a row all unique( no repeats ) ....the answer in the form of fraction not decimal I.e 1/1000000

[Steve]

I know your stance is all about the only way to beat roulette is to increase the accuracy of prediction.

Yes its simple. Its exactly like saying 35 is a smaller number than 37. It's not my opinion. It's fact. Anyone with reasonable education gets it. The whole professional gaming field gets it. But for some reason, gamblers on forums dont get it.

OK, I agree that the only way to increase accuracy of prediction is to know where the ball will most likely land and where it won't. If I had access to these devices or knew how to use them I would do so.

Im not saying computers is the only way. There are other ways. It just isnt repeaters. I've explained why, given examples, proof etc.

So I think logic would say that your method and the Repeater method are almost the same methods

Nooo. They are completely different. Repeaters uses previous spins to try to predict winning numbers. Computers use the actual variables that determine the winning number. A proper method should be cause and effect, not effect and effect.

There are still ways to improve edge based on winning numbers alone, but they are still based on legitimate cause and effect.

What repeaters attempts to do is predict winning numbers using irrelevant variables.

with Repeaters there should be a rule that states that any change to the physical nature of the spinning of the wheel should reset the Repeater tracking and not rely on past measurements

Repeaters is not a valid variable except in cases like wheel bias. Although repeaters is only very loosely associated with bias, because a biased wheel has numbers that are more likely to repeat than other numbers.

Each dealer will influence where the ball will fall by spinning the ball at different speeds or with different rythms.

Yes but this has nothing to do with repeaters. Repeating distance between one number and the next yes, but not repeating numbers.

Do you agree that using a Repeaters method in this context will increase the accuracy of prediction. And that is probably the reason I won so quickly last night.

No, I don't agree. You can have won just as quickly with common variance. Sometimes you win with random bets, sometimes you lose. Mostly you lose, which is because of the house edge.

As you say, this will not happen all the time and it will all depend on the conditions we are playing in. It definitely won't work on RNG

Turbo says it will only work if the spins are random, which is a boneheaded statement. He is saying he gets better than random accuracy when its only random.

[Steve]

But i wanna Make a bet with you Steve.
For the next coming year, we go to the casino everyday 7 days a week.
Everytime we play 37 spins and we will See 37/37 i Will pay you 10 Grand. Everytime that we don't See 37 out of 37 you pay me 10 euro! Now that 's a bet you can't refuse can you   we play 10 sessions a day that's 370 spins and 8 hours work.
I Will need to pay you 100.000 euro every day for one year. 36.5 Million euro i owe you. 
Everytime you won't See 37/37 you pay me 10 euro, that's 100 euro a day. Not bad for a day job ain't it. That's 36.500 euro a year. Great ain't it.
Now you May guess Who has to pay Who what! I'm pretty damn sure, that i can buy a great new car by the End of the year, and that you won't earn a Penny from me. Wanna bet steve? 

Sure I agree. So how we gonna enforce it and verify results? How about we just look at history of real wheel spins from a database anyone can download? Isnt that a little easier? You know, I've already tested that and a lot more. Do your testing to verify. I accept Bitcoin.

Ut wasn't ment to be serious Madi! Just to piss off Steve some More!

you masking yourself look like an idiot is not pissing me off.

No serious, he keeps telling that Random Has No limts and he is preaching  1:37 All the time even when i Keep saying that i never play 1:37 and that i never play at the House Edge.

Elle Oh Elle

Jek you are clueless. Random has a much of a limit as numbers have a limit.

And you cant do better than 1 in 37 with your approach, unless the wheel is very heavily biased. Show me one piece of proof to substantiate your claim. You cant.

And when i put a progression into play i can turn the House Edge around in my favour

Progression wont change accuracy. A progression like 1,2,4,8,16 is just a bunch of separate bets, like with different players, each making bets on separate spins with different size wagers. You still dont get it.

As Long as the game produces Random numbers i can Make a System that Will win in te end. How? Well that's another question. But the stating Point is repeaters.

Yeah ok. So you can improve your odds as long as the spins are completely unpredictable. HOW? You dont know. But it's the key, man.

Just go win your millions, please.

[jekhb76]

Sure I agree. So how we gonna enforce it and verify results? How about we just look at history of real wheel spins from a database anyone can download? Isnt that a little easier? You know, I've already tested that and a lot more. Do your testing to verify. I accept Bitcoin.

you masking yourself look like an idiot is not pissing me off.

Elle Oh Elle

Jek you are clueless. Random has a much of a limit as numbers have a limit.

And you cant do better than 1 in 37 with your approach, unless the wheel is very heavily biased. Show me one piece of proof to substantiate your claim. You cant.

Progression wont change accuracy. A progression like 1,2,4,8,16 is just a bunch of separate bets, like with different players, each making bets on separate spins with different size wagers. You still dont get it.


Yeah ok. So you can improve your odds as long as the spins are completely unpredictable. HOW? You dont know. But it's the key, man.

Just go win your millions, please.

Well Steve, i'm not the one here Who makes a fool of themself. What happend to you in the past man, why are you So bitter?
You know as well as i am that if we are Both zitting at the same Table for 10 sessions a day for a year Long, you are gonna pay me alot of money and i ain't gonna pay you one pennies. So you honestly think that in 3650 sessions there Will be atleast one Time that there Will be 37 numbers out Without 1 repeat. Man you clearly don' T Have a clue what the odds are on that bet.
It's a 1 in 766,879,127,067,901 chance that this is gonna happen. Well good luck with you'r bitcoin transfer to me. I can send you my bank number if it's More convenant for you 

[Steve]

i'm not the one here Who makes a fool of themself.

35 is greater than 37, and roulette is most predictable when its random 

What happend to you in the past man, why are you So bitter?

Hemorrhoids

So you honestly think that in 3650 sessions there Will be atleast one Time that there Will be 37 numbers out Without 1 repeat.

Probably not.  But you still havent figured out why it makes no difference.

[6th-sense]

Hemorrhoids

Steve that made me laugh funny as fxxk 😃😃

[jekhb76]

Probably not.  But you still havent figured out why it makes no difference.

There is No need to know the difference. The only thing i need to know and that i'm sure of is that everytime we play at the same Table and everytime 37 spins go by Without a repeat you pay me 10 Bucks. And everytime 37 numbers fall within 37 spins i give you you're 10K in a Black suitcase  i know Who is gonna laugh at the End of the night, Sorry but it won't be you Steve. And i Have earned myself again 100 Bucks and i can take my wife out for dinner, AGAIN, every night of the week 

[Anastasius]

Odds of 20 uniques in a row pls anyone ..... In a fraction like 1/100000 20 different numbers

[jekhb76]

Odds of 20 uniques in a row pls anyone ..... In a fraction like 1/100000 20 different numbers

Between common and rare. Not really rare.

[Anastasius]

Lol common and rare is true but its not a fraction... Like two red in a row have a 1/4 probability or whatever...its actually a hard formula to say how many uniques in a row..the wizard of odds could do it probably...

[Anastasius]

Can I ask ....who is this turbo guy. 2. Why is he talked about. 3. What's his method if he wins consistent or u are all going by his word " I can win "

[jekhb76]

everytime we play at the same Table and everytime 37 spins go by Without a repeat you pay me 10 Bucks.   

I ment: everytime 37 spins go by with atleast 1 repeat, you pay me 10 bucks.

[jekhb76]

Can I ask ....who is this turbo guy. 2. Why is he talked about. 3. What's his method if he wins consistent or u are all going by his word " I can win "

Pfff, go Google him (Turbo Genius) i think you Will get a few thousand hits
He is as far as i believe the only person Who knows how to beat roulette everytime he plays.
He plays repeaters with An agressive progression. And because he uses the Right math, he can't loose.
There are so many threads around here. If you wanna find out, it's best to start on the First Page of this thread and Read through it.

[Bigbroben]

Lol common and rare is true but its not a fraction... Like two red in a row have a 1/4 probability or whatever...its actually a hard formula to say how many uniques in a row..the wizard of odds could do it probably...

[Anastasius]

Anyone know his exact method or math...curious ....repeaters are good 12.repeat 12.are singles on averge at least u know some will repeat...I'm curious turbo method if he always win.... And progressive hmmmmm aggressive.......