@ turbo

[jekhb76]

So you know how to win, but not yet. That makes a lot of sense. 

If you actually understood, you'd know turbo doesn't make sense at all.

Yes, i know how to win , but that doesn't Mean i can aply it.

[Joe]

#2 is the same, past results don't matter to roulette. Now the current session you are playing (the current horse race)... contains ALL of the info you need. The past races don't matter. The naysayers even agree that past spins don't matter

Isn't this a contradiction? If past results don't matter in roulette then doesn't this include the past results in the current session too? Nobody uses past results from previous sessions, only the current session, so I don't see how even mentioning previous sessions is relevant. You have to use past results in order to see which numbers are hot in the current session.

[Joe]

I think it doesn't work playing roulette because the spins are Independent from each other. In baccarat the cards are pre arranged in the shoe. That's the difference.

But if you don't know how they're arranged it can't give you an advantage. Unlike in Blackjack, card counting in baccarat doesn't work, as Edward Thorp and others have proved, so the outcomes might as well be independent just as roulette spins are.

[Steve]

Turbo doesnt have answers for hard questions because the truth leads to a dead end for his charade. When he’s cornered, he either diverts, or gives useless and vague facts to leave hope in minds of inexperienced members. Like 2 comes after 1, 3 comes after 2. Anyone paying attention understands his many contradictions. I thought he was better, but im disappointed to know the real turbo.

He has given ample information to reveal his working principles, and theyre nonsense. Ramblings of an inexperienced gambler. Anyone still believing him will have the same result as CEH followers. Chasing tails for years, looking for the hidden secret for turbos kicks.

He was given the benefit of doubt in the beginning, but it became increasingly clear he really has nothing. The best case is he thought he had something but doesnt want to look stupid now he knows better. But theres too much to support he is at least now knowingly misleading people.

[D1]

But if you don't know how they're arranged it can't give you an advantage. Unlike in Blackjack, card counting in baccarat doesn't work, as Edward Thorp and others have proved, so the outcomes might as well be independent just as roulette spins are.

Edward Thorp now there is a very very clever and knowledgeable guy indeed.

[Anastasius]

Does the.turbo play 37 spin sets on repeaters ?

[jekhb76]

Does the.turbo play 37 spin sets on repeaters ?

don't know for sure.

[TurboGenius]

Isn't this a contradiction? If past results don't matter in roulette then doesn't this include the past results in the current session too? Nobody uses past results from previous sessions, only the current session, so I don't see how even mentioning previous sessions is relevant. You have to use past results in order to see which numbers are hot in the current session.

The current session is all that matters.
Using spins that came out before you started playing are "past spins", they mean nothing because the game produces random independent numbers.
The session is a collection of spins contained in your current session, they aren't past spins.
Like the analogy I gave before - someone on a vacation wouldn't refer to yesterday when they were on the current vacation as a "past vacation", it's the current one - made up of individual events that make it a whole.
The same applies for roulette and random. Each spin while your playing make up a whole (a session). Anything that happened before the player began betting is past spins and have no value whatsoever.
It's impossible to win or lose on spins that happened before you started playing, but the current session while your are playing contains all the info you need.

[TurboGenius]

Its good the reasonable members are seeing it.

(reply removed)
(waste of time)

[Anastasius]

Sorry Mr. Turbo face I think past spins do matter.... Do u agree Mr jhkb76? Lol  especially within 37 spin sets....

[Scarface]

Turbo, I like the horse racing analogy and use this sometimes myself.  Playing 3 numbers only, I pick the 3 most recent repeaters.  I'll stay on these numbers as long as they continue to hit.

If I go 12 spins without a hit, then I switch my bets to the 3 most recent repeaters, and go again.

Works out pretty well.  May use a +1/-1 progression on 12 spins sessions

I got the idea from just looking at the marquee as I play.  Eventually, the marquee showing past numbers will not go long before showing 1 or 2 numbers repeating up to 2 to 4 times. 

The nature of random is extremes.  If you ask someone to write down a random sample of 100 spins for red and black, most people will alternate between the two choices every few spins.  However, in reality, a real random distribution will have up to 8 or 10 red or black in a row.  The same logic goes for repeaters.  There WILL be a number that repeats way beyond its expected value in the short term.  Staying on a few recent hotties allows me to catch the trend

[Anastasius]

Turbo I been paying from aus for three years it annoys me a lot this game if u wnna cum Australia and teach your repeating numbers 37 set system I can make it worth it for u    Lmao ! Ha

[Scarface]

@ Steve and General,

I totally get the mathematical point of view that roulette is a losing game in the long run.  But what I am interested in, is how to reduce extreme variance.  Do you think that methods that Turbo and others use may be a way to do that?

[Steve]

You only need to know a few points to know turbo has nothing. It has all been said before. The full picture isnt even needed but if you look at it, it all points the same way.

If you're gullible or dont understand it, expect to be chasing the "secret" forever. He's wasting everyone's time. Soon Ill summarize his bs to warn newcomers.

[TurboGenius]

Soon Ill summarize his bs to warn newcomers.

Simple.
Delete my posts (you can do that)
Delete my forum account (you can do that).
The giant BS meter will drop to 0 again and things can go back to normal...
(which is how great computers work, and how bias wheels can be found and exploited...)
See ? The world is a better place already.

If I'm such a problem as you seem to portray to everyone, then by all means remove me from the ranks as you have the power to do.
People can always read what I post on other forums and places around the internet.
You can dedicate your whole forum to the "Anti-Turbo" movement, it's been done before. In reality though -  "enough" people understand the truth and actually learn a few things from what I post and use it. If that's not what you want on your forum then ask me to leave and you have my word that I'm gone.

If your goal is just to attempt to contradict everything I say, regardless - then it's not worth my effort to come here. From the email I get and my "support" I guess that would be a bad idea, but hell - it's your call. You do nothing but insult me and people who see things like I do, but don't stop me from doing it.
So.. say the word !