@ turbo

[Steve]

It goes around in circles. For those that apparently do understand Turbo's secret, they aren't winning millions and neither is Turbo. Why?

[6th-sense]

Think of it this way....

Study 10k roulette results each in increments of 37 spins. 
Get the averages of what happens
now without knowing the future you already know what happens most.

24 numbers show up so clearly 12/13 numbers are not being played.  SO right here alone is it possible to improve your chances just by getting 1 maybe 2 hits within 37 spins

12 numbers will repeat!!!!!!!!  I repeat  12 NUMBERS REPEAT!.......so of the 24 numbers that came out 12 of them hit more then once!!!!!!!

You dont need all the numbers to win to come out on top within 37 spins!

Those who dont get it havent tried it out on paper.  If you actually sit there and try it, then things will be clear on this concept.

Steve you enjoy the back and forth!

He his right I explained this on my 37 back to basics thread..I did want to give an example but struggling how to give it..not that I can’t ..it’s how to put it without giving away the vaddis bet or something very similar to it

[MoneyT101]

Consequently looking for unique numbers is pointless.

Says the person that can’t do it 

You won’t be using the same tone if you knew how to make money with it.

You invested so much time and years perfecting your wheel tracking and there’s a way to beat the game by using math 🤦‍â™,️

I feel your pain!  Well atleast it’s not to late, you can always learn by being open minded.

I know each spin is 1in 37 and the pay out is 1/35.  I know each spin is independent from the next spin.

So if I know all this and I know we can’t beat the game. Then tell me why just tell me why....?

Turbo can win within 37 spins using repeats

Vaddi can win within 37 spins using repeats AND uniques

Reddwarf can win in 6 spins using unique numbers

Priyanka can win in 9 spins using red/black

Dyksexlic can win in 37 spins using the pigeon hole

All this using the same concepts and ideas!  Just because you track repeats doesn’t mean you have to play them.  There are other ways to play unique numbers all you need is to think.

So to everyone still searching... take it step by step and don’t worry what the Experts say because you don’t know what you don’t know!

[cht]

Says the person that can’t do it 

You won’t be using the same tone if you knew how to make money with it.

You invested so much time and years perfecting your wheel tracking and there’s a way to beat the game by using math 🤦‍â™,️

I feel your pain!  Well atleast it’s not to late, you can always learn by being open minded.

I know each spin is 1in 37 and the pay out is 1/35.  I know each spin is independent from the next spin.

So if I know all this and I know we can’t beat the game. Then tell me why just tell me why....?

Turbo can win within 37 spins using repeats

Vaddi can win within 37 spins using repeats AND uniques

Reddwarf can win in 6 spins using unique numbers

Priyanka can win in 9 spins using red/black

Dyksexlic can win in 37 spins using the pigeon hole

All this using the same concepts and ideas!  Just because you track repeats doesn’t mean you have to play them.  There are other ways to play unique numbers all you need is to think.

So to everyone still searching... take it step by step and don’t worry what the Experts say because you don’t know what you don’t know!

Are you saying General and steve is the expert ?

Wow ! Both of them have brain washed forums to pose as math experts.

No sarcasm attack.
Ask General/steve to declare at what level did they study math. High school, undergrad,  Masters, Doctorate ? Lets all find out if wizardofodds, google, wiki is accurate or not. (no worries, we believe you.)

[Steve]

I did applied physics at RMIT, with intention of helping my energy research. But i quit for a few reasons. Mainly it was only teaching me text book stuff i could learn for myself in a fraction of the time without any syllabus, which i have.  But ultimately what i wanted to learn isn't taught in any mainstream educational institution.

Turbo, i have some simple questions.

Does your method use past spins to determine where to bet and how much?

If not, then how is the future used to determine bets?

It's a black and white question. Please be clear and specific.

[cht]

I did applied physics at RMIT, with intention of helping my energy research. But i quit for a few reasons. Mainly it was only teaching me text book stuff i could learn for myself in a fraction of the time without any syllabus, which i have.  But ultimately what i wanted to learn isn't taught in any mainstream educational institution.

Turbo, i have some simple questions.

Does your method use past spins to determine where to bet and how much?

If not, then how is the future used to determine bets?

It's a black and white question. Please be clear and specific.

Thank you.

[RayManZ]

I did applied physics at RMIT, with intention of helping my energy research. But i quit for a few reasons. Mainly it was only teaching me text book stuff i could learn for myself in a fraction of the time without any syllabus, which i have.  But ultimately what i wanted to learn isn't taught in any mainstream educational institution.

Turbo, i have some simple questions.

Does your method use past spins to determine where to bet and how much?

If not, then how is the future used to determine bets?

It's a black and white question. Please be clear and specific.

Maybe you should define "past spins" more clearly. You and turbo do not mean the same thing.

Turbo: past spins are spins i have not played.
Steve: past spins are spins that have happened.

Maybe you just like to ignore that statement from Turbo and keep hammering on your vision on past spins. But maybe you can choose to accept his vision on past spins and move on...

[The General]

So if I know all this and I know we can’t beat the game. Then tell me why just tell me why....?

Turbo can win within 37 spins using repeats

Vaddi can win within 37 spins using repeats AND uniques

Reddwarf can win in 6 spins using unique numbers

Priyanka can win in 9 spins using red/black

Dyksexlic can win in 37 spins using the pigeon hole

All this using the same concepts and ideas!  Just because you track repeats doesn’t mean you have to play them.  There are other ways to play unique numbers all you need is to think.

So to everyone still searching... take it step by step and don’t worry what the Experts say because you don’t know what you don’t know!

It's simple.  They can't win in the long term.  They might get lucky and win in the short term, but none of them can beat the MPR over a statistically relevant number of spins.  Maybe you should define "past spins" more clearly. You and turbo do not mean the same thing.

Turbo: past spins are spins i have not played.
Steve: past spins are spins that have happened.

Maybe you just like to ignore that statement from Turbo and keep hammering on your vision on past spins. But maybe you can choose to accept his vision on past spins and move on...

Turbo makes the shit up on the fly as he goes.  That's why he's continually boxed in by the questions.  He doesn't have a logical answer.  If you keep pressing him he'll just say something absurd like, you can't get two hits until have you have one hit, or that he wins because of randomness, or maybe he'll change it up this time and say something like, because there's water at the bottom of the ocean.  LOL!!!   

[RayManZ]

It's simple.  They can't win in the long term.  They might get lucky and win in the short term, but none of them can beat the MPR over a statistically relevant number of spins.

But can you and Steve do it? Why don't you show us how it's done?

[cht]

It's simple.  They can't win in the long term.  They might get lucky and win in the short term, but none of them can beat the MPR over a statistically relevant number of spins.

Can you declare at what level did you study math. High school, undergrad,  Masters, Doctorate ?

Thank you sir.

[Steve]

Maybe you should define "past spins" more clearly.

Spins that occured before the wheel spins again.

[Steve]

Turbo: past spins are spins i have not played.
Steve: past spins are spins that have happened.

Past, present and future have absolute definitions. Either they have or havent happened in relation to the present.

[The General]

Spins that occured before the wheel spins again.

Wow, I never thought that we'd see the day where past spins had to be defined.   

I can sense that Turbo will likely once again resurrect  the Wright Brothers to counter your argument.  Some new oxymorons are likely coming as well.

[Steve]

But can you and Steve do it? Why don't you show us how it's done?

Yes on real wheels, no on RNG.

[Steve]

Wow, I never thought that we'd see the day where past spins had to be defined.   

Ive always wanted this forum to be pioneering. Just not that way.