@ turbo

[MoneyT101]

Hi MoneyT101
- The odds in 37 spins average are .... 24 numbers(12 repeats) and 13 numbers missing, being devil’s advocate here, is this a true fact?

Those are the averages... so it can be different maybe 27,28 numbers show up

Or minus 2 or 3 repeats or more repeats

Each session is different

[Roulettebeater]

Those are the averages... so it can be different maybe 27,28 numbers show up

Or minus 2 or 3 repeats or more repeats

Each session is different

All What you sayIng is old stuff (well known)
Do you have something we don’t know yet ?

Apparently no !

[MoneyT101]

A session in Roulette is just a collection of independent bets. When we label a repeat (could be another man's unique) we are creating our own relationships between numbers, but this does not give us any accuracy of prediction. It just provides an interval on when we might change to a different kind of independent static bet. All in all will break even. I have created the most elaborate games you could imagine - even one that MoneyT suggested* - but there wasn't even a slight tilt to win or lose in the long run.



And these games were hedged/alternated!

I had written a reply but there’s no way without shedding more light to this...

So all I will say is

The hedge bet and the main bet can’t be seperated

Btw this topic is different from turbo topic so no more talk in this thread 🤐

[MoneyT101]

All What you sayIng is old stuff (well known)
Do you have something we don’t know yet ?

Apparently no !

I was replying to someone that asked a question.. you clearly hate this thread so why continue to read it, if your so smart and a know it all... why you keep coming in this thread?

Don’t you have an hg sharing thread or something.   

[Roulettebeater]

I was replying to someone that asked a question.. you clearly hate this thread so why continue to read it, if your so smart and a know it all... why you keep coming in this thread?

Don’t you have an hg sharing thread or something.   

Thx for the clarification.
Of course i have the hg

[nottophammer]

All What you sayIng is old stuff (well known)
Do you have something we don’t know yet ?

Apparently no !

Yes bleater, all old stuff well known. So if someone new is looking they can use this info, but they will be told it does not increase the accuracy, but they can see repeats will happen.
End of, bla, bla, bla coming

[Roulettebeater]

Yes bleater, all old stuff well known. So if someone new is looking they can use this info, but they will be told it does not increase the accuracy, but they can see repeats will happen.
End of, bla, bla, bla coming

Notto, i am not surprised any more !
Your words are reflection of your retardment.

I strongly suggest you to stick to horse racing betting !

In roulette, you are completely disconnected from reality 

I wish you luck and hope to see you next season in the premier league at westham as a goalkeeper !

[nottophammer]

 

[DoctorSudoku]

Notto, i am not surprised any more !

Your words are reflection of your retardment.

I strongly suggest you to stick to horse racing betting !

In roulette, you are completely disconnected from reality 

I wish you luck and hope to see you next season in the premier league at westham as a goalkeeper !

Don't ya think that Manuel Pellegrini would have some say in the matter?

[nottophammer]

What did the man say, take 3000 to win 3000 

[The General]

Is there anyone else here that can provide some logical answers to the questions that Steve, myself and others have asked regarding Turbo's system?

Perhaps someone that "is degree level Maths with distinction?" 

cough, cough. 

[IVO]

Is there anyone else here that can provide some logical answers to the questions that Steve, myself and others have asked regarding Turbo's system?

Perhaps someone that "is degree level Maths with distinction?" 

cough, cough. 

Every day I try to decipher it but my head still doesnt work correct 

[Steve]

What did the man say, take 3000 to win 3000 

So you almost lost everything, then got lucky in the last 10 spins. With play money.

[nottophammer]

almost but its only testing like your MPR so waste of time?

[TurboGenius]

Is there anyone else here that can provide some logical answers to the questions that Steve, myself and others have asked regarding Turbo's system?

Why would anyone waste their time like that ?
If they know - they have no intention of explaining it to you, and they shouldn't.
I've told you two over and over but you reject it - so move on.
Let people win and you two keep saying it's impossible.

I show you proof with a few examples, it's rigged. MPR or nothing lol. I guess it's nothing then.
"Go out and make millions" is the new catch-phrase. Funny though because AP players with a clear advantage don't make millions. Making millions therefore isn't proof that anything works. Like I said, a lucky lottery player makes hundreds of millions against incredibly worse odds - would you tell that person they can't win ?

And even if a person made millions - then - "not enough spins".
Every point has a counter-point, which is easier I think than working it out.
Some people are just wired that way.
Just repeat 1:37 vs 35:1 and making millions as proof (unless that happens, then it's no longer proof). 'eh whatever.
General posting that I'm posting as other names, what's this desperation all about ?
You know it looks really bad when the only way to combat the truth is to throw insults
and make accusations that aren't true.
Oh wait - I forgot "play for real instead of monopoly money" which I do.... not good enough - I have to make millions lol.
Someone said it above and I guess I have to agree - there appears to be a effort (for whatever reason) to make this all look silly and absurd and with every post it seems more and more that's the case. No worries, system players are no thread to the AP club.
I don't even know why bias and computer people bother to participate in forums and make comments at all. But hey, I know in reality the point is to find better ways to win other than the amazing "AP" - so they look to system players for that help. But no one would ever admit that in the open lol.

For example, there are 37 numbers on the European wheel, but the payout for a single number is 35-1. Our systems exploit roulette wheel physics to determine where the ball is most likely to land. This changes the odds from 1 in 37 to often better than 1 in 25, which ensures long term profit.

As long as I'm not the one saying this - it's fine to put that out there.
If a "system" wins 1 in 25 or better then the person saying such nonsense is clearly lying and misleading - we should all know there's only AP ways to win like that.
We can't possibly have the same advantage over the casino using a system.
Especially when we know in 37 spins there are only 24-25 numbers that appear.
Strange it requires a dominant diamond on a wheel to do what I can do on paper
with any wheel and win at the same rate...but that's BS I've heard.