@ turbo

[nottophammer]

Look dickhead on R-sim just bet the 4 hottest from the groups. here used 1-3-9-27

You best stay at G oof F orum

[Steve]

Why don't you spend more time playing so that you can post a more statistically relevant test? 

Perhaps consider posting some logic and math behind your ideas.   Proof of concept carries more weight than meaningless charts and graphs.

Notto whether you like him or not, his points are valid. You are wasting your time with repeaters. Its fallacy that existed since gamling began.

[nottophammer]

Thanks Saint Steve

[Steve]

Notto, i dont particularly care if you're an ostrich. I still sleep.

[nottophammer]

Same here Saint; lose no sleep over you and your sidekick

[Steve]

Its not us you or anyone else needs to worry about. Its yours and other people's financial position when stupid old fallacies are attempted in casinos. Like the martingale, any progression can do well for a while, and then...

[nottophammer]

zzzzzzzzzzz

[nottophammer]

I know why u picked up #7 but I dont understand why not 11 and why 15 later.

So we all know what is fact, the only point which is missing is how do we decide which 4 or 5 numbers we chose. Because it was already tested... just to pick the first 5 repeaters wont be in profit longterm. Like mako said on page 3 regarding the first example. Why did turbo only bet 21 & 34 and why he was not betting on the other repeaters. Has it something to do with pattern, dozen, lot

Member Nasty this is your reply on G oof F orum Jacob Blaze's 76 spins; at spin 38 you can be 2580 units up; using the above posted method. But remember its curve fitting to the two experts on here.

Turbo's ways are subject to ridicule on here as well. Shaking heads and other stupid gif's and comments.

[Steve]

Anyone gullible enough to follow nottos and turbo's nonsense should be aware it's garbage. But you wont know that before proper testing (unless you already understand the huge holes in the logic). A brief explanation about proper testing is at link:s://:.roulettephysics.com/testing/ - I need to add more there but its just the basics, most people dont do.

And notto you can go on and on with publishing charts of 100 or so spins. But you are going to continue to get hit with reality and logic from people that know better. Unless you post on a flat earth forum, or in the system players forum.

Also if anyone is basing their interest in turbo's nonsense on his winnings at unrealistic "play for fun" games like parx or RS, read back in this thread. I've explained how anyone can get top rankings on those games. It just takes someone with basic knowledge of the math, and lots of time to waste on winning fun money - the kind of time that turbo spends winning play money to convince gullible people he's a master.

The best software to test is either RX with a proper source of spins (not the default RNG), or custom software to test a principle like I published free. You can also use the game at :.rouletteplayers.org/register (with random.org TRNG spins) but it isnt the best option because large volume testing will take too long. The typical 100 spin charts you see from people like notto are quite worthless. The data is far too short term. You can easily get the same results with random bet selection.

[Steve]

HOW TO CONVINCE INEXPERIENCED PLAYERS YOU HAVE THE HG:

Step 1: Leave any games you're losing at, make excuses for leaving.

Step 2: Play an unrealistic game that anyone can beat. Publish your amazing-looking results.

Step 3: Proclaim the game to be fair, realistic, and impossible to cheat. Hope that nobody else has so much time to waste on play money.


WHEN THINGS GO WRONG:

Say someone like Bago has the time, and nearly doubles your bankroll like he did here:



The next step is claim Bago cheated:





Again, anyone can do this. I explained exactly how earlier in this thread. Basically with RS, use the broad betting limits to extend progressions, and aim to increase bankroll by any amount for each successive session, then reset. It will give a slow steady bankroll increase that looks cool. It also helps to use linux server rng which is notoriously flawed.

It isn't personal Turbo. You're misleading people and the majority of members across all forums are progressively understanding it. There is nothing unique about your bet selection - the accuracy is still random. All you have is progression exploiting broad table limits, and likely bad rng.

Interesting how when Turbo loses at MPR, he says the game is just flawed, has bugs etc. But RS is much better and cant be beaten, except by turbo, because random is predictable. And when others double turbo's bankroll, then RS must be flawed.. and he better contact the RS admin to complain. Seriously. Its the tip of the iceberg.

[The General]

Bago handily beat Turbo's score within one day, just for the hell of it.  And something tells me that he wasn't playing the trot or Turbo's system.   

I wonder why the MPR is so much harder for them to beat? 

[Steve]

I wonder why the MPR is so much harder for them to beat?

Yep, well, as if his contradictions and logic errors weren't enough to know better. Time for him to move onto his next play money game.

[nottophammer]

But why would he need to move onto his next play money game; when this happens.




At +483; and going to 50 unit would you carry on, or reset. Me i'd reset and carry on building the bank roll

[nottophammer]

Those 1/37 spins have to give repeats; so why would one need a dodgy phone or wobbly wheels.

Off to put my head back in the sand Saint savior Steve

[Steve]

Notto, youre not playing with a full deck.

Those 1/37 spins have to give repeats;

After 1 spin, theres a 1 in 37 chance the next spin will be a repeat. If theres no repeat after 2 spins, then theres a 2/37 chance, and so on. It all comes from 1 in 37. I explained the math before. Its just basic probability. How can you not understand it by now?

so why would one need a dodgy phone or wobbly wheels.

Because they give better than 1 in 37. They win millions and are more dodgey than your ancient theories?

Red will eventually spin. It has to, right? Thats the key to the hg too, right? Come on notto. Surely youre not that behind are you?