@ turbo

[Steve]

Also keep in mind refuting bullshit is mostly about accuracy, for the benefit of anyone reading. Responses are not necessarily for the person speaking bullshit, although naturally responses to bullshit are directed at the person spreading it.

[Firefox]

AP guys, can't you just let adult forum members go about their roulette journeys regardless of your seemingly superior informed knowledge and opinions? The vast majority of active members are mature adults who can make their own life decisions

The system players can post their ideas in the system players forum without interruption, where AP's and maths experts are barred.

Or if they want, they have the choice to post in the general forum where the ideas are open to comment from all.

Clearly, if they are posting in the general forum, they are welcoming comment and criticism from all sides.

[Bebediktus3]

Why should someone prove their system in ur kitchen?

Nobody must of course, but where is logic so avoid that? Where is benefit from avoiding? if you want to hide then why at all come here and talk?

Not me start all these talks - it's you who start bragging in your victories  .
I do not see any benefit from such brags and when somebody asks to prove  - run to shrubs.

Not want to show - not start talk at all

[Maui13]

Check

So... will you share the code or the system with us?

[Rulet]

Turbo's method works, only if you know how to pigeonhole numbers that are hitting above average, there I said it.
Can you do it?
Have you tried it?
Anyone who has tried turbo's method and failed, try some more
Cos it WORKS!
Only used 1 pound as starting unit and mild proggression!

[Atelur noisap]

And why do not you tell us how to do it?

[The General]

The pigeon hole is absurd.

The reason is obvious, there's one or two too many numbers on the wheel.

[Blood Angel]

Turbo's method works, only if you know how to pigeonhole numbers that are hitting above average, there I said it.
Can you do it?
Have you tried it?
Anyone who has tried turbo's method and failed, try some more
Cos it WORKS!
Only used 1 pound as starting unit and mild proggression!

Would you pigeonhole them according to their EC attributes?

[Rulet]

Then don’t play all off them! simples
Play enough to win
Why should turbo give his system away on a plate, then everyone’s a winner ( noones got chicken dinner)
What do you think the casinos will do?
His time machine analogy is enough to figure out a winning strategy
And you can do it in many different ways it all works out the same
I miss turbo’s posts so inspiring they were (sighs)
Anyway, good luck

[Rulet]

No according to how many times they show when I m playing
What does pigeonholing mean?
Think about it ?
What happens when you pigeonhole?
Something must happen for you to be able to pigeonhole
Too many clues

[Steve]

Turbo already revealed his system. The clues were clear enough. Problem is it doesn't work. And pigeon holes change nothing. Rulet if youre winning based on nonsense, it would be short term. Nobody answered my questions like why turbo isn't winning on rs anymore. Why?

People find out eventually. Just try and save time. Learn quicker.

[Taotie]

How do you know he's not winning?
He obviously has his RS account switched to private so we can't see it.

[Steve]

Because he's not bragging like usual.

Bragging was the whole point of parx and rs. They both have leaderboards. But they both are unrealistic. Coincidence?  He said himself he wanted to use them as proof for everyone.

[The General]

The pigeon hole players tend to forget about the zero when applying their method.

[Firefox]

Pigeonhole is used as a pseudo-babble soundbite by some players. Like Van de Waerden, Ramsey, or cycle, it's a valid mathematical principle.

But just because it's a valid principle, it doesn't mean it offers an exploitable advantage in a negative expectation game with extra slots and unfair pay off.