@ turbo

[cht]

Nope,  I'm a online player. It's just more easy. Never had problems with connection or pay outs etc....

But on my trip in cambodia yup...buy in for 5-800$ and every night a room and food and drinks and cigarettes and.....yes girls

Yea the girls make all the difference.

[Bayes]

And here we have it once again. ..... Because You can't figure it out no one can.

That's not what I said. If you're going to reply then reply to what I actually wrote, not your interpretation of it. 

[Steve]

Again it's a very well tested fact that past numbers (including hot numbers) dont at all change the odds (exception is bias). So if you have 13,13,13 consecutively, the odds of 13 spinning next are still 1 in 37. The odds dont change for the next spin, or anytime soon. SO WHY WOULD YOU PICK HOT NUMBERS OVER COLD NUMBERS? WHY WOULD EITHER CHOICE BE BETTER THAN RANDOM BETTING?

[Azim]

Hello All,

It's your money your time.

I had run a simulation of this sometime back. The number's don't add up.

If some one want's to give out exact rules: I will code this again for everyone to see it for themselves.

Please, no twisting of the rules. Once confirmed by everyone the app or tracker will be published.


Anyone up for it?

[Steve]

I already published free software so anyone can see for themselves. It didnt change anything probably because people dont care to test properly, for whatever reason.

[Azim]

Steve,

I agree with you. However, I am going to play dumb and say. They think you have something about system play because of the business you are in.
To people it looks like you have a hidden agenda.

I can publish the rules in probably 20 simple steps.

However, like to see the people who have claimed to prove it with graphs. Come up with it so no mis-understanding.

If this won flat betting. Do you really think people would play a marti progression of 1 2 4 8 16 when a number hit's lets do the math right here.

It's simple. The marti progression is the first killer never mind the flat bet selecting the hot number's.

I am sure there is something wrong in the programming or the number's have been fixed to reflect that.

This reminds me of someone by the name of ALBALHA or whatever it was.  Could beat a million spins however still looking for a system  from people.

[falkor2k15]

Anyone tried parachuting:
1s: bet the 1s till there are 2s...
2s: stop betting 1s and bet 2s
3s: stop betting 2s and bet 3s
...

Since there are less numbers involved at the higher levels, perhaps the parachute progression could end up in profit with a few tweaks, but I seriously doubt it.

[Steve]

[cht]

I assume Alex has left this forum.

The rules are simple, very simple in less than 20 lines. There're 3 aspects to get right - post#398. Nobody is going to give the rules to you, do your homework for yourself. There's more than enough relevant info on this thread contributed by a number of posters not too difficult to find them.

If you're someone who knows payouts as well as a dealer does plus sees each and every number on the carpet in your head(not eyes) then you should be able to SEE it at a glance what this idea is all about.

There's nothing to prove. No one can prove it to you, nobody can convince you that's a silly, childish thought. You prove it to yourself, no one is going to do that for you.

It's an idea. There're many ways to skin the cat, it's obvious if you SEE it. Post #401. The main difference is the risk exposure in each model.

And if you don't SEE it, then move on. It's BS to YOU.

Keep the conversation focus on the idea, stay away from personalities including about yourself it's not relevant never will be btw who cares.

Btw I play bacs full-time my way at the local b&m casino. Still.

My last post on this thread. Out.

PS. I don't reply to PMs on this matter.

[Azim]

There is nothing rocket science about the rules.

I don't want them for myself. I will not do it as how I see it.
People see things differently when looking at the same thing from different elevation.

That's why I said, let someone post the rules if they claim it's a winner. All I was willing to do was share it with everyone to see for themselves. They could load as many spins as they wanted.
No personal agenda for me.

[INTERCEPTOR]

There is no rules, only clues about nothing.

[vladir]

So I read part of this thread. I may have missed something, but at some point turbo seems to speak about a progression. Probasah claims its all flat betting. Are they talking about the same thing at all?

[Steve]

So I read part of this thread. I may have missed something, but at some point turbo seems to speak about a progression. Probasah claims its all flat betting. Are they talking about the same thing at all?

You could spend a week pulling apart inconsistencies, bad logic, misunderstandings and loads of other junk.... and in the end you'll conclude there's nothing valuable in Turbo's approach. It's just the same crap repackaged.

[Bayes]

There is no rules, only clues about nothing.

Agreed. And supposing someone thinks they've figured out what the system is from the "clues", what then? The teaser won't confirm it anyway.

I don't get it. If you want to post your ideas then just do it. If you think you've found a winning system but don't want to share, then don't post anything, just keep it to yourself. What's the point of posting hints and clues if you have no intention of sharing? the hints are not "sharing" anything. You just come across as an attention seeking knobhead. If you feel you need more attention, try getting a f*ckin dog.

[denzie]

It's just the same crap repackaged.

Kinda like what you and Bayes post every few pages. We get it. We totally get your point. Now take a step back let others talk . Thx