@ turbo

[maestro]

There are no active "baiters" here at the moment.

only suckers...

[Moxy]

Here we go again. Im just trying to protect my system selling business and cant stand to see the hg exist, right?

Or how about turbo started this by posing questions for anyone to answer, and Im answering.

Im a player before seller of anything and if turbo has something better than what I have, then Id like to use it. I give my best methods free then players pay me part of winnings. Dont assume my focus is only what you see.

As for all this, it is perhaps an unpopular fact that so far Turbos statements are inaccurate. Ive explained why already, but its not being understood. So once turbo answers my wuestions, I can propose some testing to see if I actually know what Im talking about, or Turbo has something thats not clasdic fallacy.

Lets put aside the snide comments and let proper testing prevail, agreed?

Im interested in the truth, whatever it may be. I am not bound to what i think i know. I open to any change in my understanding. But when im told 1+1=400 im going to keep an open mind, but still carefully investigate the claim with a proper approach.

No.  They got it all wrong.  You DO want the hg to exist (Considering the current state of counter tactics) And you want it on the cheap/free because you think Turbo would go through that trouble of testing it with millions of spins because he's a good sport sharing his time and effort. 

The galls.   TG doesn't owe any of these people anything, you included.   Correction, at you giving away your method.   More like licensing out your device indefinitely to go play for profit sharing.  You have a way with words.  Also, I didn't know proper business goes hand in hand with socialism here.

[Steve]

You DO want the hg to exist

Yeah, so what? Dont you also want it to exist?

And you want it on the cheap/free

I have offered a price, if there are no HGs or no takers, big whoop. I'll still sleep.

you think Turbo would go through that trouble of testing it with millions of spins because he's a good sport sharing his time and effort.

Millions of spins?

And dont overcomplicate it. Simply he made inaccurate claims and misled people, so I just explained the mistakes.

TG doesn't owe any of these people anything, you included

Yeah we all know that. Again dont over-complicate it. When inaccurate claims are made, some people correct them. I dont care if he shares or not.

Correction, at you giving away your method.

Initial investment and risk of being scammed is what people fear most. The point is they pay me nothing to start.

Also, I didn't know proper business goes hand in hand with socialism here.

You are missing the point and making things more than what they are.

[Moxy]

Well here's hoping no one is desperate/stupid enough to relinquish their proprietary rights for pennies to the dollar on here. 

[Bayes]

I leave you with another quote from reddwarf, whom I consider the number 1 authority on Roulette:

Why do members think certain people are "authorities"? Only because they claim they have the HG. They say that this doesn't work or that doesn't work, but they never tell you what does work, only drop vague hints. I consider the number 1 authority to be math, because it's always right. 

And the rule about no baiting has nothing to do with socialism. It doesn't say if you have the HG you should post it because everyone has the "right" to know it, only that IF you claim you have but only post endless hints, you should expect to be moderated.

[nottophammer]

Mr Bayes
you are probably correct that

you consider the number 1 authority to be math, because it's always right. 

But that wheel does not know, it has to obey these laws or you'd be a winner 

[Steve]

The wheel doesnt know or care. The winning number is just cause and effect. And math is an expression of the same thing. It means random accuracy = long term loss.

Its not complicated. Its not a case where the wheel doesnt know about rules, so doesnt need to follow rules.

[nottophammer]

The wheel doesnt know or care. The winning number is just cause and effect. And math is an expression of the same thing. It means random accuracy = long term loss.

Its not complicated. Its not a case where the wheel doesnt know about rules, so doesnt need to follow rules.

so why make such a song about it

[nottophammer]

Wally
1st game bet fred, take 1st profit, as we are unsure of Turbo/dezies method, so who's to say play this way is wrong.


If carry on with 4 units on R3 be 40 units down that profit is going, only need some more to go R3 and that black hole is there.

Steve please don't waffle on about accuracy or the math

[nottophammer]

If you start as mentioned bet at spin 1, using 1 unit over the 1st cycle, dont this cycle need 703 units, if thats correct then 20 wins of value 36 units are needed to win.(720)

Now is the LOTT a recognised piece of math, who cares it is said you'll likely get 23/24/25 non-hit come, so lets take the usual quoted 24 and 13 pockets never hit, which become those repeats that hotties are aiming for.
As we're using 1unit, the 1,2,3 prog, when a number hits, we dont have a new number to bet, but place it on the repeat, so we've increased to 2 units of the 1,2,3 prog, if we went to 5 units, the cycle value has now changed further than the 703 units, would a late win on all pockets being bet at 5 units make a profit ? look at the bet fred sheet black hole looming

[nottophammer]

Just got wood steve so i wondered who to jizz, jizzed your last post for the fun of it

[3Nine]

Hey Bayes,
I think this has been asked before but, what math?

What the thinker thinks, the prover proves. - William James

[nottophammer]

Again Wally if you've had chance to look at your e-mail, this is in PP paddy power.
Now this machine is minimum .25p unit, what i like as it increaments in 1 all the way, not like the other FOBT roulette games where after reaching a £1 unit it then goes to £2, not £1.25
It also shows hot/cold #'s and when the zero last appeared.
So on the marquee is latest spin 22
22
07
24
05
24
20
20
27
18
28
34
19
20
13
10
11
Now #24 is shown as 1 of the 5 hotties, dont remember the others, but zero is cold and has missed for 19 spins as i start, ok.
Look whos showing, so is it just a ploy showing the hot/cold.


I walked with +32 just watching for bets whether non-hit or repeats using the trot of the starting 37#'s, but as i always say take the 1st profit and start again.

[Steve]

Just got wood steve so i wondered who to jizz, jizzed your last post for the fun of it

Don't get into a jizzwar with me. We can't keep jizzing all over the place.

[Bayes]

Hey Bayes,
I think this has been asked before but, what math?

What the thinker thinks, the prover proves. - William James

Hi 3Nine, what do you mean what math? Basic probability.

That quote applies to psychology, which is about subjectivity. There are such things as objective facts too which are beyond opinion.