@ turbo

[denzie]

We're ready for the next step.... 

[jefra]

TG in my opinion gave up. Maybe he lost a session (as he said he will visit casinos in January) 

[denzie]

TG in my opinion gave up. Maybe he lost a session (as he said he will visit casinos in January) 

Every method loses sometimes. As long it isn't frequently it's all good. It's actually pretty hard to not be in profit each session. As long the progression is used wisely. Progressions need to be applied over time. Use the math each spin and calculate if and when it's necessary to use it. Many sessions I don't even need to use one.

The trick is to reset on time or your "group" could turn cold. Not sure if I play as TG does but I'm sure I'm pretty damn close.

I'm done within 2 cycles mostly
Also don't use a progression that recovers losses in 1 hit. Let's aim for couple of hits.

[Steve]

My rng systems win most of the time in say 200 spins. It's what happens when they lose that makes reality obvious.

[ignatus]

My rng systems win most of the time in say 200 spins. It's what happens when they lose that makes reality obvious.

Problem with roulette is to increase the accuracy of prediction (as you use to say) why don't you give us some hints about your betselections? Is the wheel-bet/wheel-sectors/wheel-predictions the only way?

[Steve]

I've said it all many times.  See my past posts. I try to help but most people aren't interested to understand why i say certain things.

[ignatus]

I've said it all many times.  See my past posts. I try to help but most people aren't interested to understand why i say certain things.

I read what you said, but then we can all give up the carpet and concentrate on the wheel?

[denzie]

I read what you said, but then we can all give up the carpet and concentrate on the wheel?

That's an easy one. YES.
The carpet is there to place our bets on only. It has no other purpose.

Inside bets only !

[Steve]

The betting table has as much to do about the winning number as my tv.

The most obvious is focus on what determines the winning number. The variables like wheel. My system correlates variables and spin outcomes which is the most logical approach. What could be more logical than cause and effect??

But maybe you can focus on other methods of bet selection. Chaos theory, precog, who knows. Just not progression and the usual stuff.

[ignatus]

ok thx

[Steve]

Roulette is a game of illusion. You'd be surprised. Once it's understood, winning is not at all difficult. It's then more about time and avoiding detection.

You cant beat every wheel but you don't need to for it to be practical. Just like not every investment or business venture will be profitable.

[TurboGenius]

TG in my opinion gave up. Maybe he lost a session (as he said he will visit casinos in January) 

For starters - as I said - it "can't" lose and therefore it hasn't lost.
The math prevents it from losing. I'm pretty sure that I made that clear a long time ago.

[ignatus]

hahaha what a joker    

[jefra]

TG, if you play airball machines, then all can be possible!!!  Even loss of your "Holy Grail" system.  Even Steve can lose with his RNG system on airballs ;-)

[jefra]

Denzie;
If you think that TG waits on 12 numbers that has not came out in a cycle, and then bet on them and use a progression on those numbers; then I think that you are wrong.