@ turbo

[thelaw]

@Steve

Just went to look up what agency the ACCC is exactly, and this was one of the first hits:



WTF?

[thelaw]

@Steve

Disregard the question...........I've seen enough.

There might be some honey-dicking going on here...........but hell if I know.

There's more drama around this than a Mexican Telenovela!!!

I'll let you guys get back to it........

[Steve]

Thelaw, you referred to a site full of blatant deception. Thats not what comes up with a ACCC search. You know about it.  Everyone has seen that site. You only referred to it trying to piss me off. Why? Because you have nothing left to say. Rather than engage in a civil discussion with logic, you throw mud. You aren't the first person to do that. The rubbish you referred to is refuted in detail at :.genuinewinnerroulettesystem.com

There was rational discussion until you trolled here throwing mud. If you have something valuable to contribute, do so. But you are on moderation because childish mudslinging is not tolerated.

[Steve]

Steve...I'm really sure you don't know how to play them. Really. You know a lot about roulette for sure...but sure not everything.

Its not a complicated concept. Turbo is talking about 38 spin cycles. So the question is if there is a repeater within 38 spins, is that number more likely to spin in the cycle more often than another? The answer is NO. It's not just me who has tested it to no end.

[Priyanka]

So the question is if there is a repeater within 38 spins, is that number more likely to spin in the cycle more often than another?

Steve unfortunately thats not the question. See below from Turbo.

Absolutely not.
A number appearing doesn't mean that the time that it takes to appear again will be anything other than what it would normally be. It could be the next spin - or hundreds of spins. So no assumptions here, and that has nothing to do with where I'm going with this.

The concept is a bit more than such a straightforward interpretation. To be able to understand you must try removing the cap on next spin odds are 1/37 or 1/38 and it never changes. If you are not able to, you will never be able to understand this. Try this one for a change, think about the odds of a spin repeating itself. When there is one spin only available, the odds of that spin repeating itself is 1/37. When there are two spins already available the odds of a repeat happening in 3rd spin is 2/37. So as you see, the odds of a spin repeating increases gradually till it becomes 1 when all the spins have spun. So if you consider this as a one set, even though the odds of next spin always remains 1/37, the odds of a repeat happening in next spin, constantly changes and in an increasing curve. I am sure the odds changing in this fashion is a fact.

Now try moving on to the next step. Take the numbers that repeat in the above sequence and create another sequence. Does odds or predictability change? Thats a question I would love you to find the answers yourselves, if you are really interested in understanding what is happening.

[Steve]

Well then this is proving a waste of time.

There were specific examples like there never being 38 numbers in 38 spins.  I refuted this. But now are vague tg explanations that are impossible to test, because they are too vague.

But i will say i have software that tests the frequency of sequences after specific sequences and the result is as i suspected... past spins don't affect future spins with exceptions i knew about. It is old news and well tested.

I don't find tg's claims credible. I hoped i would find some truth in it all, otherwise i wouldn't have invested time. But its just going in circles. Everything being said is the same ballpark as law of the third and it doesn't work. I am still open to someone proving me wrong.

[falkor2k15]

When there is one spin only available, the odds of that spin repeating itself is 1/37. When there are two spins already available the odds of a repeat happening in 3rd spin is 2/37. So as you see, the odds of a spin repeating increases gradually till it becomes 1 when all the spins have spun. So if you consider this as a one set, even though the odds of next spin always remains 1/37, the odds of a repeat happening in next spin, constantly changes and in an increasing curve. I am sure the odds changing in this fashion is a fact.

Now try moving on to the next step. Take the numbers that repeat in the above sequence and create another sequence. Does odds or predictability change? Thats a question I would love you to find the answers yourselves, if you are really interested in understanding what is happening.

This is something I would love to test, but it's really vague...

"When there is one spin only available, the odds of that spin repeating itself is 1/37."
Understood.

"When there are two spins already available the odds of a repeat happening in 3rd spin is 2/37."
!? "two spins available"? What does that mean? Does it mean:
Spin 1: 29; Spin 2: 15... now more chance for 29 or 15 to repeat next spin?

Or does it mean:
Spin 1: 29... now more chance for 29 to repeat 2 spins later?

"So as you see, the odds of a spin repeating increases gradually till it becomes 1 when all the spins have spun."
Depends on understanding the previous sentence.

" So if you consider this as a one set, even though the odds of next spin always remains 1/37, the odds of a repeat happening in next spin, constantly changes and in an increasing curve. I am sure the odds changing in this fashion is a fact."
Next spin or next 2 spins? I think maybe a typo or something.

"Now try moving on to the next step. Take the numbers that repeat in the above sequence and create another sequence."
Ala "positions" = outside the box?

Chances of a reply from Priyanka to the above questions: 3/37!

[nottophammer]

Is the math written in stone? or is the math like a good politician, it will manipulate the answer.

If written in stone, the math wont lie, but does the roulette know it is supposed to play as the math states?
Answer, roulette does what it wants, not to the set rules.

Spin 1 #29, spin 2 #29, does the math say its going to show again? it has the same chance, as to show, or as, not to show.

Thats how a novice see's it.

[TurboGenius]

Wow - I wish that I had time to reply to this, but it will have to wait until later.

[nottophammer]

Didn't post this Friday as seems nobody gets ROTT, both games total 168 units. #7 did come again 32 spins



Set in stone,WTF?

[RouletteGhost]

The idea is that in MOST cycles a repeater will hit 3 or more times

So in MOST cycles we can profit by betting a low amount of numbers, by only betting the repeaters

Don't worry turbo those who get it, get it

[nottophammer]

There's spins and then there's spins, you just have to read them, make the decision 

[nottophammer]

This is a bit naughty of me, but go to the leaderboard, keep an eye on 2bobbet, talked of a Turbo method, looks impressive.

[jefra]

Guys, some spins for testings:

jan_17_2017- t3n_  237no.                                    
33      29      10      33      15      29      7
19      0      34      27      29      4      16
9      33      2      28      17      26      34
22      27      32      28      9      31      16
10      7      4      23      25      31      36
17      11      29      1      34      19      26
22      1      13      9      33      2      36
36      18      30      5      32      4      29
12      20      31      35      15      10      36
23      18      15      32      12      5      7
4      26      23      19      35      19      18
33      12      14      32      6      7      9
27      18      1      24      15      10      14
7      27      36      8      25      7      12
30      9      30      5      10      34      11
8      28      3      23      10      8      
32      4      32      30      16      12      
28      21      8      18      14      34      
24      34      36      35      17      12      
22      30      1      34      27      30      
11      0      22      3      8      33      
9      17      9      9      9      30      
15      3      1      6      18      20      
15      10      21      16      21      15      
15      14      13      0      36      28      
32      29      16      2      34      35      
25      10      27      6      12      4      
31      35      13      18      4      35      
24      6      14      31      7      31      
31      23      13      6      7      16      
5      13      2      27      20      34      
28      24      6      2      1      4      
6      36      12      7      11      16      
26      6      6      4      10      32      
31      34      14      8      7      35      
14      14      20      22      0      7      
13      24      20      4      8      25      

[nottophammer]

spin 7, #22, +15
Vaddi or interblock