@ turbo

[ArmitageShanks]

Yeah in B&M ive never gone over 40 spins as thats about my limit ('m too easily distracted) but on line ive gone nearer 90 with similar results, of course over millions of spins it will fail 

[Steve]

MPR is made however members want it. The chat window and same spins for everyone is a completely different approach. If you play another game, I'm not offended... you cheating, lying, infidel! Your mouse is clicking and clicking on another server's interface. Dont you know how hurtful that is? I hope you catch a ctd virus.

[TurboGenius]

So anything that works is met with:

"Not a real simulator"
"Not enough spins"
"Rigged for players to win"
etc.
Regardless of the RNG or how the spins are picked.
And if it does work - "RNG isn't the same as Live wheel spins" (even though we all know that no one can tell the difference between the two)
Or if it is live play - not enough spins, a lifetime of daily play is good for testing, etc.

It's amazing. Reminds me of politics - It's ok to have your cake and eat it too as long as it supports your beliefs.
A RNG where the player wins isn't a legit "test" so use another RNG and test 1 billion spins to make sure it loses - both using RNG (maybe even the same one).
If it wins in live play (slow.... impossible to test anything at that speed) - it's not enough spins - the wheel is possibly bias, etc. No credit there for results.
So there's no point really - that's where it's "going in circles", no evidence is good for proof unless it shows something losing (and only then it's not Rigged, it's accurate results). I don't get it.

[ArmitageShanks]

And the last tonight to finish that off. Hopefully work again tomorrow in B&M.
Thanks to Turbo(and others) for starting me on repeats!

[Steve]

"Not a real simulator"
"Not enough spins"
"Rigged for players to win"

So according to you, mathematically rigged games are ok. And  statistically insignificant amount of spins is ok. Maybe that's why 99% of your play doesn't involve real money.

My beliefs don't change reality. Neither do yours. I remember now you say your system works because spins are random. That's a huge contradiction. Random is random is permanent negative expectation.

And actually you can tell the difference between rng and real spins, with enough spins

In the end i measure a systems  success based on both appropriate testing, and how much real money it has made.

It's strange. The whole community of professional players, the ones who make the money, have been through the system period and know repeaters is nonsense. The clues are all there. Anyone can do proper testing. But most players don't, which is why they are stuck in fallacy without a clue they are.

Resolve it easily. Win your millions. When is the last time you read about system players winning millions?

[maestro]

MPR is made however members want it.

i never wanted some low life cunt to be able to log in my account and admin on the site to not give a shittt...

[Steve]

Maestro, calm down. Nobody has logged in your account except you. The problem is something simple like you logging in on another device. So all you need to do is clear browser data and log in on your new device. Look into things more before pointing fingers.

[maestro]

Nobody has logged in your account except you.

not true...i did reset bank and had 1000 since then i have not play and is not 1000 now ...as admin on site you should delete account being used by someone else...

[Steve]

 that is probably because the server was restored. Anyway more forward. Let me know if there are any problems

[cht]

About proof, there's no proof that's good enough for both systems and AP in online environment.

However, genuine(not fake as in photoshop) results gives a good indication of the potential. The rest comes from the basis behind the system.

[Tinsoldiers]

So there's no point really - that's where it's "going in circles", no evidence is good for proof unless it shows something losing (and only then it's not Rigged, it's accurate results). I don't get it.

Why are you so obliged to provide a proof?

SomeOne interested in your methods will follow your methods irrespective of a proof. One who doesn’t or one who doubts, the proofs will never be sufficient as there is no clear mathematical proof that you have provided for your method apart from stating some facts. No one apart from you can prove/disprove whether your method works as it is private to you. Both sides are fair. To be fair to everyone, you will have to accept when people say repeaters don’t work because that is how much we know. You can’t expect yourselves to be opening peoples eyes by putting more fog in front of them.

[777]

How would you devide your br?
(Lets say 1000 units)
How much would you bring for 1 session ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
(10 ? 50? 100? 200 ? 300 ? 500? 1000? )

500 pr session. thats what i have experienced works best for a session

[TurboGenius]

Why are you so obliged to provide a proof?
SomeOne interested in your methods will follow your methods irrespective of a proof. One who doesn’t or one who doubts, the proofs will never be sufficient as there is no clear mathematical proof that you have provided for your method apart from stating some facts. No one apart from you can prove/disprove whether your method works as it is private to you. Both sides are fair. To be fair to everyone, you will have to accept when people say repeaters don’t work because that is how much we know. You can’t expect yourselves to be opening peoples eyes by putting more fog in front of them.

Very well said.

[denzie]

Maybe go back to the basics.... the 37/38 people walk into the casino stuff...

Bet each numbers as it shows up.... use a 1/2/4/8/16/.... on a hit....

Do some testing to figure out which br to bring and how much you could win/lose per session( important)

Later cut down some numbers. How? Random choice? Or maybe just maybe play those with small gaps between hits. 

[TurboGenius]

Maybe go back to the basics.... the 37/38 people walk into the casino stuff...

Very good advice