@ turbo

[sniper]

You are a member on this forum since long time, haven't you managed yet to get yourself a HG?

Roulettebeater, I strongly believe Denzie has got his HG long..long ..long ....before you.

I am 99.99% certain about this because I downloaded all his post and have been reading all this while.

I got my winning system from one of his post. I have been playing 7 days per week at B&M casino ever since.

Thank you very much Denzie.

Regards and Best Wishes

Ps/ It's suppose to be 100%, the remaining 0.01% is waiting for him to admit it,

[keepontryin]

jekb76.........ok here it goes......walk up to the tale bet the the first # tto hit 2x..bet that # for 37 spins.....if hit retrack  if loss....look into timemachine pick the newest # hit 3x.....bet for 37 spins if win restart if loss look in time machine....use a positive progression.(as turbo says you cant bet all numbers some will pass you by but because of the math you can not loose..........am i close

[Roulettebeater]

Roulettebeater, I strongly believe Denzie has got his HG long..long ..long ....before you.

I am 99.99% certain about this because I downloaded all his post and have been reading all this while.

I got my winning system from one of his post. I have been playing 7 days per week at B&M casino ever since.

Thank you very much Denzie.

Regards and Best Wishes

Ps/ It's suppose to be 100%, the remaining 0.01% is waiting for him to admit it,

I am glad for you guys !

Keep milking the casino!
Sooner or later they will milk you back and get the blood out of your nipples

[ZERO]

Sooner or later they will milk you back and get the blood out of your nipples

WTF? 

[Pallmann]

please rate my program

[Roulettebeater]

WTF? 

People wanted to become richer playing roulette, once they started to play they became poorer !

[denzie]

People wanted to become richer playing roulette, once they started to play they became poorer !

Coz that happened to your weekly HG's?

[Roulettebeater]

On weekend I lost but I was guilty because of lack of attention !

I was able to double my bankroll in 3 days and then lost all !!

[nottophammer]

I don't think so, but Always better then betting on unhit #ers.

But if you have an understanding of the 37 spins, the unhit appear, you don't have to bet every spin, GUT teaches this, by showing the trot(old topdog will love that)
Just look at Morts avg for ef-bet.

I said in a post some where that i have fuck all to do as i'm stuck at home thru my immune system attacking my joints, so i'll muck about with repeats. Just left MPR playing for repeats and said i'll post the sheet for sugtip in MPR, but here will do. 1000+ units i missed the last #10 as the gap was 20+ at times, but it came and i missed 3'600

[RayManZ]

Your chance is still 1/36. You are betting 1 out of the 24 numbers from the pool, you lose to the other 23 numbers,

Here you have 13 unhit, so there are 13 repeats in total. you chance of hitting one of the repeat is 1/13.

Therefore your actual chance of hitting is 1/36 in 36 spins (23+13).

Regards and Best wishes.

Look at the bold text. You said the change of hitting a repeat after spin 1 is 1 out of 13. Because there will be 13 repeaters.

But we only have 1 number at the moment that can repeat. So that number has a 1 out of 1 to become a repeater. Ofcourse with more spins you will get more numbers so the odds keep changing.

[Kav]

Have a question to this timemashine theory. Lets take a cycle of 37 spins as our time cycle. After spin 37 I see in theory 24 numbers hit and 13 havent. Now I travel back to spin 1. As im not the smartest guy I forgot which 24 numbers will hit in the next 37 spins. BUT, and now comes my probably dumb question, why shouldnt I bet on the number which hit at spin 1? Lets say spin 1 #30 hit. Why on earth I should not bet #30 for the next 36 spins, as i know this number is in the pool of the 24 numbers which came up till spin 37? Sure I dont know if it will hit again, but isnt my chance 1/24 for the next 36 spins?

good post.
Some people don't understand that there's (on average) only 24 numbers that appear in a cycle - yet they continue to say the odds of winning are 1 in 37 (or 38) because they can't see past "each spin is independent from the last". Thinking on a "1 spin at a time" basis is probably the biggest thing keeping most people from winning.
Your #30 is now a "potential" repeater, unlike every other number on the table - they can appear (1 in 37 odds) but they can't be a repeater until they have shown at least once.
That makes #30 a potential repeater. Keep going with this line of thought that you posted and you'll find even more value in it than you do now.

With all due respect, I can use your logic to prove that it is better to NOT use repeaters. Roughly speaking, just to present the argument:

Scenario 1 (previously hit number)
A number has hit. We know that in the next 36 spins 24 different numbers will hit. 12 numbers will hit (at least) twice. This means that a number which has hit, has 50% chance to hit again in the next 36 spins

Scenario 2 (unhit number)
A number has not hit. We know that in the next 36 spins, 24 numbers will hit at least once. This means that a non hit number, has 24/36= 66% chance to hit in the next 36 spins.

Conclusion
In the next 36 spins, the unhit number has better probabilities (66%) to hit, than the previously hit number to hit again (50%).

Of course, both arguments, yours and mine, are misleading. The truth is, that betting previously hit numbers, offers neither an advantage nor a disadvantage. At least not based in the logic presented here and in previous posts.

[nottophammer]

why is it any better betting for repeats in 37 spins.
As said and shown, like winkel shows with his checkpoints, the 1st third are the larger group un-hit, 2nd 3rd its 50/50 both are appearing and last 3rd repeats are happening more, but whats repeating 1x,2x,3x, unless your betting everyspin how will you be on the right one.
Can be just as dear betting near the end for repeats as betting at the start for unhits

[ZERO]

Have a question to this timemashine theory. Lets take a cycle of 37 spins as our time cycle. After spin 37 I see in theory 24 numbers hit and 13 havent. Now I travel back to spin 1. As im not the smartest guy I forgot which 24 numbers will hit in the next 37 spins. BUT, and now comes my probably dumb question, why shouldnt I bet on the number which hit at spin 1? Lets say spin 1 #30 hit. Why on earth I should not bet #30 for the next 36 spins, as i know this number is in the pool of the 24 numbers which came up till spin 37? Sure I dont know if it will hit again, but isnt my chance 1/24 for the next 36 spins?

... but wouldn`t it make sense to wait for these repeats to happen and then start betting for the 3rd, 4th etc hit as surely a certain number probably would repeat more than once in a 37/38 spin cycle?

[Roulettebeater]

dealer are instructed to spin the ball in two different directions (clockwise and anticlockwise) ...

Let's take an example, dealer spins the Ball as follows :

1- clockwise
2- anticlockwise

Do you think that there is some dealer who can spin the ball with the same speed regardless of the spin's direction ? And if yes how probable is this event ?

[nottophammer]

sug #10 was busy but #8 was better the hottest