@ turbo

[Proofreaders2000]

According to the late Flat_Ino aka Iboba a
winning system should be in profit after 400 bets.

[Steve]

Yes only if we all stuck to short term sessions. Combined, we could bring down all casinos.

[nottophammer]

Proof
should that read before 400 bets.

Mortagon today betting for repeats using 1,5,10, spin 34 +206.

Thats money in the bank.

The crew know how, repeats,PROGRESSION

[Steve]

The mpr combined results suggest otherwise.

[ozon]

Let's see what will happen
Return to the basics and at the same time a question.
Bet selection
Repeaters in gap no  more than 6 spins, played by 18 spins
If hit, we play this number for the next 18 spins

We will be playing very few numbers
And here's the question, What MM will you recommend?
Stop lose 200 units, target profit 200 units or more

[ignatus]

Let's see what will happen
Return to the basics and at the same time a question.
Bet selection
Repeaters in gap no  more than 6 spins, played by 18 spins
If hit, we play this number for the next 18 spins

We will be playing very few numbers
And here's the question, What MM will you recommend?
Stop lose 200 units, target profit 200 units or more

sorry im alittle drunk tonite, but? does it really matter if a number hit once or twice? i mean -as i've proven with the BRAVO-system that 1 number hit, (could be a sleeping number waking up,? And therefore chances for it to hitting again? seem good) compared to a number hitting twice, chances for it to hit a third time (within a short time-?) me think- a 1 hitter is good enough, if not better chance of hitting twice than a 2 hitter hitting a 3rd time.? That' the question (?)

[ozon]

We can do an experiment, I think that the results could be interesting.
We start the sessions by choosing the first two numbers and play them for 18 spins.
If we have a hit, this number is played for the next 18 spins.
But the results can be very random.

And so I think it is needed, stoplose and target profit, and the most important is the  positive MM.

[Proofreaders2000]

Proof
should that read before 400 bets.

Mortagon today betting for repeats using 1,5,10, spin 34 +206.

Thats money in the bank.

The crew know how, repeats,PROGRESSION

Flat was stressing at most people would make
400 bets in a lifetime if that system were the Grail.

[jekhb76]

C'mon guys, Turbo said it is very simple, Just comon sense that he can't lose by using math. Then why haven't we All worked it out a Long Time ago?
I guess my iq and that of everyone else on this Forum (No offence) is below 50!
How come that something so simple is so hard to understand by All of us?

[The General]

C'mon guys, Turbo said it is very simple, Just comon sense that he can't lose by using math. Then why haven't we All worked it out a Long Time ago?
I guess my iq and that of everyone else on this Forum (No offence) is below 50!
How come that something so simple is so hard to understand by All of us?

Turbo really sucks at math.  He made the absurd math claim because he couldn't comprehend it.  He never posted any math. 

[TurboGenius]

Turbo really sucks at math.  He made the absurd math claim because he couldn't comprehend it.  He never posted any math. 

yawn - another "General" post...

[TurboGenius]

Hello Turbo.
If you find a session with a lot of balance that does ?? Keep playing until an imbalance of numbers is formed in your favor, right?
I have had sessions that I had to reach almost 300 balls to have something positive, but playing flat.
It's normal right? being a flat game ...
Anyway, I do not follow his steps a lot because I'm focused on something simpler and faster, but I know his game quite well, but when there is a balance, it sinks a lot.
A greeting and grace spor everything he put so that I learn about his way of seeing the game
regards

I'm not sure that I understand your post.
Anything based on repeaters will work, as long as there isn't "balance".
On the even money bets you could see balance - 60 reds and 60 blacks for example.
Nothing would really work on these very well.
On the straight up bets there is almost never balance or equality.
A number could show 10 times in 80 spins, another number might not show at all.
You have to focus on how to win on the repeater.
If there were balance within the numbers appearing (it wouldn't be random) - then
just like the even money bets, it would be incredibly hard to win - but that's not the case.
While in a session there might be a lack of repeaters of course - but this changes.
You won't have 37 numbers in 37 spins without a repeat,
The farther you go into the future, the more imbalanced it gets -
With the proper progression you can't lose. Wins recovers bets lost prior.
I've said this for a long time but the naysayers won't understand it.
Here's a simple 4 step progression - controlled, no higher bets than 4 steps and
controlled number of bets being placed on the table that anyone could do.
The math supports this as well - but I have to watch or else I'm being misleading (lol).
Let me know if that helps.
Below I just ran off spins (rng) showing clearly how repeaters don't work).
(yes, being sarcastic)


And here were the hot and cold numbers (and average appearing numbers)


And here is my results, as you can see - not perfect at all (never claimed to be).
In purple at the numbers I won on at the highest step in my progression.
So as you can see, I missed opportunities on #s 2,9,15,17,18,36
and I had large bets on a few of the under performers #s 5,19,29 even though
they still won for me and made profit.

I've said over and over - you don't have
to be perfect, you only need to structure your bets in such a way that you're
betting on a few of the hottest numbers and the progression has to be
aggressive and not a mild one.
You can make this chart over and over for as long as you like with the same
winning results.

[maestro]

Turbo you do understand that steve and general will start shitttting again...

not that you give shittt..good one

[TurboGenius]

Turbo you do understand that steve and general will start shitttting again...
not that you give shittt..good one

lol - well, also they should please note from my chart.
I never lost a single high progression bet on #s 7,12,35,25,0
because at no time had I ever bet on them.
You can't win by losing bets on numbers that don't appear, that means I miss
some real winners - but that's perfectly ok... I don't need to be perfect.

[nottophammer]

I'm not sure that I understand your post.
Anything based on repeaters will work, as long as there isn't "balance".
On the even money bets you could see balance - 60 reds and 60 blacks for example.
Nothing would really work on these very well.
On the straight up bets there is almost never balance or equality. What like in spins 11-40
A number could show 10 times in 80 spins, another number might not show at all.
You have to focus on how to win on the repeater. Same for non-hit
If there were balance within the numbers appearing (it wouldn't be random) (There’s a fulcrum point in spins 11-40) - then
just like the even money bets, it would be incredibly hard to win - but that's not the case.
While in a session there might be a lack of repeaters of course (but the lack of repeats means those numbers that get your repeaters are hitting) (  - but this changes. (Yes the fulcrum point)
You won't have 37 numbers in 37 spins without a repeat,
The farther you go into the future, the more imbalanced it gets â€" ( that would depend on how you use the 37 cycle)
With the proper progression you can't lose. (Totally agree,) Wins recovers bets lost prior. (Does that not depend on the aggressiveness of the progression, I’d say 1,2,3,4,5 is a no,no)
I've said this for a long time but the naysayers won't understand it. ( what 2 on here and over at GF plenty, LOL)
Here's a simple 4 step progression - controlled, no higher bets than 4 steps and
controlled number of bets being placed on the table that anyone could do.
The math supports this as well - but I have to watch or else I'm being misleading (lol). ( too those stuck in 1/37)
Let me know if that helps.